Niclas Hedhman schrieb:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 15:24, Mark Slee wrote:
>
>> What we'd really
>> like to set up here is a system where there are different people with
>> committer priveleges to different parts of the project.
>>
>
> Hmmm... I would oppose this for two reasons;
>
> 1
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> On Jan 23, 2008 7:23 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Niall
>>
>> Asking someone politely to rename the package is hardly throwing our
>> weight around.
>>
>
> Well you were talking about "need to change the package name" and
> "rigorous protecti
Janne Jalkanen schrieb:
>> very much agreed and I guess if one can show a migration path (as I
>> have suggested) which doesn't break too much, then I think nobody
>> should mind renaming the packages.
>>
>> But with the ASF member hat on I think the package org.apache.* is
>> something which the
Michael Wechner schrieb:
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
>
>> I agree with the general point about the legality of using the
>> org.apache namespace. However, I think there is a significant issue
>> here. People assume that org.apache code is from Apache.
>>
>
>
> agreed. Hence I would also suggest that wh
I don't know anything about the legal side, but it would seem to me to
be quite unacceptable to publish new releases with org.apache.*
namespace. That namespace belongs to the ASF, and users will expect that
anything published under that namespace has the approval of the ASF.
So if development of
Hi,
Sorry for this simple question, but I cannot find an answer on the
incubator site pages.
Is a project under incubation allowed to import its existing sources
(not under the Apache license) into the Apache svn?
And after graduation from the incubator, is it ok for the svn history to
still show
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:04 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Heidi Buelow wrote:
> > Did anyone else notice that the svn repository seems to have
> > disappeared?
> >
>
> Yes, something bad seems to have happened to the SVN repos.
> I haven't been able to get to svn since sometime between 10
> and 11
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 05:01 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > Discussions regarding the Web Security situation on legal-discuss have
> > revealed that IBM have provided a "patent license" to Apache for this
> > particular project. However, in the opinions of at least one lawyer,
> > any
> > deriva
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 03:19 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > Could someone please provide information on any patents known to apply
> > to this project?
>
> No, damnit. That is not how patents work! If we are notified o
(I don't subscribe to legal-discuss, but I presume the discussion in
> question is wrt WSS4J?).
>
> On 7/14/05, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Dear Incubator P
> On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Incubator PMC,
> >
> > I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please
> see
> > the latest status at:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
Could someone please provide information on any
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:52 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Sorry, the previous email was sent incomplete. I'll try again..
>
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:45 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 23:10 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > Simon Kitching
Sorry, the previous email was sent incomplete. I'll try again..
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:45 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 23:10 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Simon Kitching wrote:
> >
> > > legally isn't it impossible for a GPL'
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 23:10 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Simon Kitching wrote:
>
> > legally isn't it impossible for a GPL'd project and an
> > ASF'd project to *have* "synergies"?
>
> Not at all. Individual authors may contribute their ow
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 23:04 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> Suggestion: the way to encourage people to move to the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list is to stop responding to
> questions posted here.
>
> It only encourages them.
I'm happy to ask future questi
re working in parallel with FSF folks on
> the licensing issues as well for while now. Please see the FAQ as
> well. we are gonna leverage every bit of code and expertise that we
> can to make this happen.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 5/6/05, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 19:23 -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >> How does SWT relate?
> >
> > It really doesn't. I think of it as an extra-J2SE application API.
> >
> > But there has been quite a bit of back and forth about SWT and Swing so
> > this
Hi,
Can someone clarify for me why Harmony is being proposed when GNU
Classpath, Kaffe and other projects are quite a long way to satisfying
the goal of a Free Java environment?
Is it:
* That SUN is not expected to ever grant a free license to run the TCK
for a GPL-licensed project, so the only
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 01:13, Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Ashish,
>
> Thanks for the informative mail. It did go a long way in bettering my
> understanding with regards to The Apache Software Foundation.
>
> However, based on your feedback, the following come to my mind:
>
> >Firstly,
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 05:20, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Ashish Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are a product based company named Daffodil Software Ltd, based in
> > India. We have developed many good products using JAVA out of which our
> > two premium product Daffodil DB (an RDBMS) and Daff
20 matches
Mail list logo
