On 20/04/2015 06:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GeodeProposal
> a
On 19/03/2015 06:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
>
On 12/03/2015 15:27, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> ...Easy: we reach out to all the folks who may have a legitimate claim to
>> have
>> contributed to the project in substantial ways and ivite extend an offer to
>> them
>> (explaining
On 03/04/2012 16:47, Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
> See Jim's email (subject "CloudStack") of an hour ago.
Which list did that go to? I don't see it in my Incubator mail.
p
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>> I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is
On 03/04/2012 16:46, Brian McCallister wrote:
> I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there
> something I missed?
>
> http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072
I was just about to ask the same thing...
p
--
[key:62590808]
signature.asc
Descri
On 11/11/2011 00:14, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Updating this, half of the items without sign-off in July are now
> signed off. I've updated the list below (though I've not yet added new
> PMCs since June).
>
> Here's the previous email:
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> He
On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
>> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
>> could start as the TLP and later become
On 15/11/2010 20:03, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> All of these reports are missing and need to be posted IMMEDIATELY!
Kitty is just starting up.
The lists, SVN etc have just or are just now being configured.
Work will begin after the first SVN import of the existing code.
p
0x62590808.asc
Descrip
On 20/09/2010 14:45, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:20 AM, msacks wrote:
>
>> At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
>> for voting on the kitty proposal.
>> The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
>
> +1
>
> IIUC
On 15/09/2010 08:27, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> +1 (Not binding)
Another +1 (non-binding)
p
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, msacks wrote:
>> At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
>> for voting on the kitty proposal.
>> The wiki page is located at: http:/
On 13/09/2010 14:35, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> So far I see 2 clear (binding) +1s for the proposal...
>> Calling out for more ;)
>
> Echoing Bertrand's comment, people may have been waiting for a [VOTE]
> thread.
A VOTE is a good idea. :)
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
ds. Thankfully, this
> proposal didn't say "framework" or I may have timed out after the
> first :-P ... my comments were focused on the community aspects around
> mailing list management, and successfully growing a lively and
> sustainable critical mass.
>
> Che
On 08/09/2010 13:44, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
>> community has voted (see
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser
+1 (non-binding)
Small point: if a Mentor must be a Member, I can't be one, because I'm not.
p
On 08/09/2010 16:00, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> +1 (Notbinding)
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>>> ...
>>
>>> *Mailing
On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
> But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
> assumptions about a name.
>
> Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
> Framework tells me it is either a generic connectors framework for
> connecting a
Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
Tomcat Connector?
p
On 18 Aug 2010, at 16:17, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it?
> Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are already "generic", so
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pid resolved INCUBATOR-109.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Subject to an update, all is well.
> Amber Status page upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879776#action_12879776
]
Pid commented on INCUBATOR-109:
---
OK great thanks.
> Amber Status page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pid updated INCUBATOR-109:
--
Attachment: AmberStatus.patch
Patch for Amber documentation.
> Amber Status page upd
Amber Status page update
Key: INCUBATOR-109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-109
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: site
Reporter: Pid
On 01/06/2010 14:34, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all Amber community members,
> our infrastructure is up and running!!! If everybody agrees I'll start
> moving my original Amber stuff from Lab in the new SVN location.
> Thoughts?
Sounds good. I'd like to contribute code too, but Pablo & I are stil
On 17/05/2010 22:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> FYI I just fixed the report - the beginning of Clerezza
>> report had been mistakenly deleted in revision 19.
>
> Thanks. Apparently, the entire thing was gone, including the section header
> that said it was neccesary.
>
>> Looks like there are ot
That would be great, thanks.
p
On 2 May 2010, at 02:44, David Jencks wrote:
> Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the incubator
> pmc and be an additional mentor.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in implementing
On 30/04/2010 19:13, Paul Lindner wrote:
> Is there any chance that Amber could provide the OAuth plumbing for Shiro?
I'd hope so, but I'd be interested to hear any Shiro committers thoughts?
We think there's enough Apache projects with plans for, (or existing
v1.0), OAuth implementations that i
On 29/04/2010 23:43, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical.
> This should allow Amber to provide container managed authentication in any
> jaspic enabled servlet container. I'm not familiar enough with OAuth to know
> if it makes sense to ha
On 29/04/2010 10:45, Paul Lindner wrote:
> The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for
> the Apache Incubator.
>
> 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago
> and Vincent]
> No 0 or -1 votes.
That's excell
26 matches
Mail list logo
