+1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
Regards,
Patrick
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote:
> Hello IPMC and everyone,
>
> The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote
> passed with
> 14 +1s (including +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.
>
> He
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:35 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to start the process to move forward on a new incubator website.
> Based on discussions in the past on list, I wanted to do the following:
>
> - Roll out a new technology stack + repository
> - Leave content in place, while
+1 xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, checklist looks ok. Was able to
build/test/install the source. lgtm.
Patrick
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote:
> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
> approved the proposal to rele
Hi Gary. You want to summarize all the votes, including the ones on the
project's dev list, here - I (and others) had voted on the dev list thread
already.
Patrick
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnem
I had to use
mvn -pl
'!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service,!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-pmalloc-service'
clean install
on my mac (guess I didn't have mvem and pmalloc installed?)
Patrick
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I ch
Hey there, just back from vacation and getting caught up. Thanks for
the reminder!
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> Hi, John
>
> I think our mentors are busy during the day.
> Patrick was on vacation last week. I'd suggest give them a few more hours to
> signoff t
This vote has PASSED with the following tallies:
+1 Binding total 9
Patrick Hunt
Jacques Nadeau
Henry Saputra
James Taylor
Andrew Purtell
Chris Nauroth
Arvind Prabhakar
P. Taylor Goetz
Ted Dunning
+1 No-binding, total 11
Phillip Rhodes
Ramkrishna S Vasudevan
Uma Gangumalla
Debo Dutta
Tsuyoshi
ng Wang, Intel
* Uma Maheswara Rao G, Intel
* Kai Zheng, Intel
* Rakesh Radhakrishnan Potty, Intel
* Sean Zhong, Intel
* Henry Saputra, Independent
* Hao Cheng, Intel
=== Sponsors ===
Champion
Patrick Hunt
Nominated Mentors
* Patrick Hunt - Apache IPMC member
* Andrew Purt
t;* Gregory Chanan
>
> * Guoquan Shen
>
>* Hadi Nahari
>
>* Hao Hao
>
>* Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>
>* Johnny Zhang
>
>* Karthik Ramachandran
>
>* Mark Grover
>
>* Milo Polte
I already voted on the dev list thread, but here's my +1 again.
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi IPMCs,
>
> Please help Twill community to VOTE on release.
>
> Thank you.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 bi
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > I don't think that's the question on the table. Typically, podlings make
> > committers == PPMC members. The reasoning being that the only thing a
> > PPMC member can do is vote on
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:05 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> * I would invite folks with access to go to Sentry's private list and
> look over discussions about adding new contributors, and discussions
> about the project in general.
>
>
> I
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2015 10:03 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > > ...If you read the graduation requirements it says nothing
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > So you are -1 then. That's fine. But it gets back to my original concern.
> > It's artificial. I can go back to the Sentry community and say "hey,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Joe, has any of this conversation put your mind at ease about the
> > podling?
>
> I'm less concerned than I was, yes. I'm still not in +1 territory. I'm
> not entirely sure I'm out o
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > ...If you read the graduation requirements it says nothing about adding
> PPMC
> > as a strict requirement to graduation:
> >
> http:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > ...what would the action item the community should take away from
> > this? As their mentor I'm not sure what advice i can give them. "add more
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 04:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > ...Sentry started with 24 committers/PPMC. It hasn't added any PPMC
> members
> > since its inception...
>
> If that's correct I'm -1 on graduating Sentry.
>
> and earlier he
fwiw it's +9 by my count (24->33). Sentry is security, so by my definition
that's pretty good. ;-)
Patrick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> All of our projects are primarily in the recruitment business, so it does
> concern
> me that a project that's been here for over a ye
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the
> release
> > work.
>
> I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing
> much room for volunteer
I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature
community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request
for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the
open. What more do we want? I don't see anyone excluded and I'm sure if
there wa
I haven't seen the "quick closing" aside from things like some test
cleanups, even then the average was 5 days. I ran the jira report for
resolution time and it certainly doesn't seem like jiras are being closed
"instantly". Most of these are closed after many (typ. double digit, some
tripple) days
10x to what Chris said, put much better than I could.
We all wear multiple hats, can't tell you the number of times I've worn my
Apache hat in the office, in some cases to my own detriment there. If I
weren't associated with the project at Apache that representation would be
missing. So really it
ors aren't inclined
> to sign off based on some of the issues that have popped up.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:35 PM Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Hi David, you and Joe have been doing great, I'm afraid I've been
>> distracted with more issues at home/work than usu
eedback and the response (ongoing) from the community we
should be able to get things back on track.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some goo
Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some good feedback
along with folks attempting to address the feedback. Processes updated or
re-iterated, etc... I haven't seen any comments like "stop the presses
till... is addressed" and that being ignored. More along the lines of an
issue b
+1 - xsum/sig are valid. Rat ran clean. Ran through the release checklist
and everything seems fine there.
Patrick
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:11 PM, gqshen wrote:
> Hello IPMC
> We have passed the PPMC vote for Sentry incubator release 1.5.0-rc0 with 3
> +1 votes from Prasad Mujumdar, Lenni Kuf
+1. the sig/xsum validate. Rat ran clean and the files all look right to me.
Patrick
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Signature file look good
> Checksum files looks good
> NOTICE file looks good
> LICENSE file look good
> DISCLAIMER file exist
> No third party executables
+1 - xsums/sig verify, RAT ran clean and the appropriate files are there.
Note: for some reason the sha512 file is gzip'd (at least it was when
I d/l it via chrome), not a text file. However if you un-gzip it the
sha512 matches.
Patrick
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> NO
+1 sig/xsum are valid. RAT ran clean and the checklist looks fine to
me (license/notice/disclaimer/etc... are all good, etc...)
Patrick
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose a vote to release parquet-format-2.2.0-rc2 as the
> official Parquet Fo
The S4 retirement vote is in progress:
http://markmail.org/message/mkxdu6fnzmsybeq2
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to kindly request some assistance
> from the mentors of the following projects: devicemap,
> kalumet, s4, wave and npanday (
-1. The release artifact seems to be totally wrong to me, I think it
was built incorrectly/accidentally, it certainly wasn't built the same
way as the 1.2.0 release artifact.
Some of the problems:
1) the artifact is 500MB - the previous artifact (1.2.0) was 86k,
unless you added tons of test data
terday with dates (both Incubation
> status reports and Project setup section). Is it not update enough?
>
> Thanks,
> Terence
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> -1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated
>> before you pub
+1
Patrick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make t
-1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated
before you publish this (generally, but specifically see the "Project
Setup" section):
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/twill.html
If you're not familiar with the mechanics of this see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/we
The status page is updated and it looks good to me.
+1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and
hould be updated for 2014
* the release artifact (spark-0.9.0-incubating.tgz) is missing the
DISCLAIMER file, I see that the text is included in the readme, this
is somewhat non-standard but seems fine.
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Patrick, prior to any i
Hi Patrick, prior to any incubator release you should ensure that your
status page is up to date. The "Project Setup" section in particular:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Any updates from the mentors?
>
I reviewed/signedoff on the report. I've commented both in public and
in private to the s4 folks that they should consider retirement as an
option. I was/am waiting to see what the community decides.
Patrick
13. Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> Non-Binding (+1)
>
>1. Alejandro Abdelnur
>2. Edward J. Yoon
>3. Joe Stein
>4. Patrick Hunt
>5. Ashish
>6. Tom White
>7. Andrew Purtell
>8. Bernd Fondermann
>9. Larry Mccay
>10. Seetharam
r notification about commits
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> Git is the preferred source control system: git://git.apache.org/twill
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Twill (TWILL)
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would
ther
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Curator Project:
>
> * Jordan Zimmerman (randgalt)
> * Jay Zarfoss (zarfide)
> * Eric Tschetter (c
n be added after project
> creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
>
> * Ali Rizvi (ali.rizvi at oracle.com)
> * Arvind Prabhakar (arvind at apache.org)
> * Brock Noland (brock at apache.org)
> * Chaoyu Tang (ctang at cloudera.com)
> * Daisy Zhou (daisy at wibidat
+1 (binding) sig/xsum verify. rat runs clean. I've run through the
release checklist and everything seems fine to me.
Patrick
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0
>
> We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt R
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> Sebb is awesome.
>
+1
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
Hi Jordan, re the voting process see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
Also the other links to "how to release" type pages for other
incubator projects. It will give you insight into the process and
things like templates for emails and
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
Hey there, just back from vacation, hopefully Sebb can weigh in but
here's my thinking:
> We have 2 key questions, which I reproduce below:
>
> 1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
>
> - in the LICENSE file o
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 20:57, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 21:00 , sebb wrote:
>>> On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> gradle/gradlew scripts to not have the ASL header because this is generated
>> code.
>>
>> According to th
uired Resources
>
> Mailing lists
>
> • curator-private (with moderated subscriptions)
> • curator-dev
> • curator-commits
> • curator-user
> GitHub Repositories
>
> http://github.com/apache/curator git://git.apache.org/curator.git
&g
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Pat,
>
>
> On 2/26/13 11:39 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>
>>[…snip…]
>>>
>>> Either: (a) define Curator to be its own separate project/community,
>>>with
>>>
Apache
organizational structure will be decided upon graduation." Given this
I don't see why we'd artificially constrain things up front as you've
suggested.
Patrick
>
> On 2/26/13 9:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12
rged as a higher level ZK client. Surely project like HBase and others
>> that relying on ZK would appreciate simpler client to ZK.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Henry
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb
ation =
>> >
>> > * Curator wiki at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki
>> > * Curator issues at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/issues
>> > * Curator javadoc at GitHub: http://netflix.github.com/curator/doc/
>> >
>> > = Initi
hub.com/Netflix/curator/wiki
>> * Curator issues at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/issues
>> * Curator javadoc at GitHub: http://netflix.github.com/curator/doc/
>>
>> = Initial Source =
>>
>> * git://github.com/Netflix/curator.git
>>
>> == Sour
I second this. Short of the name search these folks are ready to graduate.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report, Crunch!
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + The Crunch community has been very active and continues
+1, sig/xsum validate, code is compiling/installing, I ran through the
release checklist and everything checks out.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> +1 RAT tests pass (as do others), checksums & sigs match.
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Matthias Friedrich w
; The existing code already has unit and integration tests, so we would
> like a Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted.
> This can be added after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Kishore Gopalakrishna
> * Shi Lu
> * Zhen Zheng
> * Ada
gt; === Other Resources ===
> The existing code already has unit and integration tests, so we would
> like a Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted.
> This can be added after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Kishore Gopalakrishna
&
ir
>of the Apache Bigtop Project, and to have primary responsibility
>for management of the projects within the scope of
>responsibility of the Apache Bigtop Project; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be a
You need "passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.".
afaict so far you have 1 (me).
Patrick
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> We are missing an IPMC vote for this release and the vote closes today. Can
> we get an IPMC member to vote, please?
>
> Thanks
+1. The signature and checksum files all verify for me. I ran through
the release checklist and that seems fine. RAT check looked good.
license/notice files look valid for both src and bin artifacts.
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1, I checked that the src art
FYI, you should CC the incubator general list on release votes.
I mentioned it on the dev list - the incubator status page for s4
needs to be updated, it's significantly out of date.
Patrick
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the first release candidate
Blur has been accepted into the incubator with the following vote tally:
+1 : 15 (10 binding)
-1 : 0
Patrick
vote details:
Dave Fisher (binding)
Bill Graham
Tim Williams (binding)
Jukka Zitting (binding)
Mohammad Nour El-Din (binding)
Patrick Hunt (binding)
Ashish Paliwal
Olivier Lamy (binding
s ==
> * concurrentlinkedhashmap - Apache 2.0 License -
> http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
>
> == Cryptography ==
> none
>
> == Required Resources ==
> * Mailing Lists
>* blur-private
>* blur-dev
>* blur-commits
>* blur-user
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + 1. Still working towards an initial release on Apache with the current
>> + code (version 0.4 = version 0.3 + checkpointing + bugfixes)
>
> Is there some specific issue blocking t
Seems that was dropped from the template? it's here on the "how to
release" page: http://incubator.apache.org/oozie/HowToRelease.html
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 June 2012 15:36, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> The Apache Oozie team is pleased to announce the release of Oozi
esam...@apache.org
> * Hari Shreedharan hshreedha...@apache.org
> * Henry Robinson he...@apache.org
> * Jaroslav Cecho jar...@apache.org
> * Jonathan Hsieh jmhs...@apache.org
> * Juhani Conn
+1. sig/xsum verified. The RAT report looks good. I ran through the
incubator release checklist and all of the items seem to be covered. I
was able to run all of the unit tests successfully.
Patrick
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMCs,
>
> Oozie Incub
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be
>> reached and allow people to move on.
>
> When diversity concerns were rais
Btw, S4 is short a mentor. It would be great if one or two IPMC
members could volunteer and help Arun and I with mentorship duties.
Regards,
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low
> activity. I
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer
>> or doesn't it make sense at this point?
>
> I'll give a closer look at your upcoming report unless someone beats
> me to it. I guess you're still busy setting things up, so
Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be
reached and allow people to move on.
Patrick
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
>
> The graduation requirements say
>
> "The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not highly
> depend
I've added Crunch to the monthly report for June. There is currently
no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer or doesn't it make
sense at this point?
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>>&g
at least 4 separate organizations represented by active
commiters.
Regards,
Patrick
>>
>>>
>>> Needless to say, when the graduation proposal reaches this list, and I'm
>>> sure it will, I will strongly endorse the IPMC to reject the proposal.
>>>
&g
Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low
activity. I pinged them about cutting a release a couple months ago
and they said they weren't ready. As for activity there is some
mailing list traffic but almost no jira/commits listed in april/may.
For Bigtop i've been tracking di
+1
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
>> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
>> below.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I'm embarrassed to report that I'm feeling a bit foggy on the new
> committer policy, and a quick tour with google failed to find it on a
> web page. We're long on pages about initial podling setup, and not so
> long on others.
>
> So, if
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
>
> Perfect, thanks!
Roman could you post this on the wiki? (looked but didn't notice it th
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>>...
>> EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. "Works
>> under the following licenses may be included within Apache products"
>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
>> help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
>> guidelines.
>
&g
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines. It's very clear from
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html that what has been proposed
is acceptable under existing Apache rules. Bigtop is building
on/ar
+1, signatures and xsums all look good, rat passed, tests pass. lgtm.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projec
> that fixed I will spin up another RC.
>>
>> Brock
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
>>> there is nothing in the notice for this.
>>>
>&
-1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
there is nothing in the notice for this.
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
> Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
>
> +1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cec
+1 lgtm. The sig/xsum check out. I was able to build the zk debs
successfully on my ubuntu system. I ran through the incubator
checklist and everything seems in order.
I managed to generate the rat report via "mvn apache-rat:check" and it
checked out.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ala
+1, lgtm. sig/xsums are all correct, was able to build/test
successfully, rat report was clean. I also ran through the incubator
release checklist and everything looks fine.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified gpg/md5, unpacking, and startup.
>
> Brock
>
> On Tu
+s4-dev@
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks.
>
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200:
>> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100:
>> > Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you a
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 - binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
>> willingness to govern itself through a free
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu
>
>> Sqoop was ASL licensed and had an open following long before it
>> was accepted for incubation
://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mrunit-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAFukC%3D4Gie5Yvbyp84QmY%2BtVj9pJ9BMuEv4xeqCSHnamrZX6DQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Brock
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> me/tom/chris is not sufficient? Or did I miss something?
>&g
velopers to explicitly build as per
>>>>>> their hadoop platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would also , suggest that the BUILD.txt contains some instructions
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> the build profiles for appropriate had
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> The discussion pertains to the presence of com.cloudera packages in the
> source code of a podling for the sake of backwards compatibility with
> Cloudera products.
Alex this is an incorrect summary of the facts, similar to the FUD you
tri
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to support
> their customers and provide backword compatibility, but this is *not* the
> point at all, the point is this *should* not, and even allow me to say this
> is *mu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>> We should also give Arvind and the rest of the Sqoop community some
>>> indication how to proceed, given the voting period is completed.
>>
>> A concern has been raised by IPMC m
>> Note that API is not just method signatures but includes all aspects
>> of implementation such as class hierarchies, type compatibility,
>> static and non-static state etc.
>
> I think that it's good to have binary compatibility with Cloudera's old
> bindings. I still don't see why it's a req
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a
>> technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If
>> Apache fe
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I'm not sure that JSR specs a
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
