[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950928#comment-17950928
]
Niall Pemberton commented on INCUBATOR-288:
---
Checking out the follo
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 14:53, PJ Fanning wrote:
> Seems best to allow the discussion thread to proceed and if things seem
> ok, then start the name approval step. The vote only happens after the name
> is approved by Brand Management.
Does it have to be strict in where it takes place in the proc
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 01:25, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:02 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton >
> >> wrote:
> >&g
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Incubator Team!
> >
> > Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of
> > Geronimo and batchee.apache.org now redire
Hi Incubator Team!
Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of
Geronimo and batchee.apache.org now redirects to geronimo.apache.org/batchee
:
- https://batchee.apache.org/
The old incubating batchee website still exists at the following location:
- https://svn-
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 16:27, Jason Porter wrote:
>
> > On Dec 6, 2022, at 01:43, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Well, those numbers are a bit better than the initial ones.
> > Thing is: Mentors will not only have to help onboard people to Apache
> and teach them how to do thi
Wow, 137 GitHub repositories!
OK, so 38 are archived and 19 are forks, but that still leaves 80! Do you
have a rough idea of how many of those would be part of the incubation?
Historically, Apache has been against "Umbrella Projects" - encouraging
them to break up and become individual Top Level
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product
based on an ASF project doesn't mean they have to mention it at
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if
> the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
>
> A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For
> instance [1] mentions Apache once but h
I'm +1 to this for OpenWhisk.
I'm -1 to this as a general availability.
There could be issues down the road which means that this option is
withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were
later disappointed.
Niall
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
> >
> >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >> >
> >>
> > > related to a data management platform that provides
> real-time,
> > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications
> throughout
> > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures.
> > > >
the initial members of the
> Apache Geode Project:
>
> * Anilkumar Gingade
> * Anthony Baker
> * Ashvin Agrawal
> * Avinash Dongre
> * Barry Oglesby < bogle...@apache.org>
> * Bruce Schuchardt
> * Dan Smith
> * Darrel Schneider
> * Dave Barnes
> * E
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> > >
> > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to
> the infra team on how to implement going forward.
>
> Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $
> podling.incubator.apache.org work, and
eau into the Apache Incubator
> > Jochen Wiedmann (binding)
> > Craig Russell (binding)
> > Niall Pemberton
> > Bertrand Delacretaz
> > Josh Elser (binding)
> > Stian Soiland-Reyes
> > John D. Ament
> >
> > [0] +/-0 Not overly bothered
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:10 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a
> vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator.
>
> For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at
>
> https://lists.apache.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content
> types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated
> self-documenting REST inte
term.
Niall
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 5:58 PM Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please look at more current data
> > >
> > > https://github.co
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sunday, 3 April 2016, 20:18, Niall Pemberton <
> niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new
> > committers/pmc members" in the &quo
Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new
committers/pmc members" in the "most important issues to address in the
move towards graduation" - but in that time there were no changes to the
community. So what changed to make the ppmc/mentors now think the project
is ready to gra
I already reviewed the release and voted +1 on dev@geode, but just wanted
to ensure that my vote was also counted here.
+1 (binding)
Niall
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Anthony Baker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release
> 1.0.0-incubating.M1.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> > The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty
> clear,
> > since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
> >
> > But what happens
The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear,
since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during
incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vote and the grant just
needs recording with the secretary or should
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do
> for other project.
>
> Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating
>
> (I pa
+1
Niall
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> I should like to call a vote to accept Milagro into
> the Incubator. The full proposal is available at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MilagroProposal
> as well as below.
>
> Note that the project was first discussed here under
>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Also it looks like you may of run rat after building the software not
> before. Those file don’t exist in the source tar ball and only exist after
> building the software.
>
Doh, yes. I did a clean before I ran RAT, but the build pol
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> >> > Attached a patch to:
> >> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> >> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
>
> Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I
> ran the build and no issues.
>
> Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after running for quite a time.
> When I exclu
Hi Santosh,
Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I
ran the build and no issues.
Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after running for quite a time.
When I excluded "myriad-scheduler\src\main\resources\webapp\node_modules"
it finished quickly and was good.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > Attached a patch to:
> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
>
> Tha
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then
> do
> > we need to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement?
>
&
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
> > Well, the transition is not that hard if:
> >
> > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
> >
> > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301)
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
>
> http://podling.incubator.apache.org
> http://podling.apache.org
>
> See for example:
>
> http://systemml.apache.org/
> http://systemml.incubato
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Both Swiz and AS3Commons were originally hosted on Google Code and Apache
> License was clearly stated there[1][2]. So I don’t think there’s any
> question about the license. Like you said, it’s not likely anyone that
> contributed even if they don’
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that
> authors don’t want us to have.
Surely it depends on how that work was licensed before the ASF?
http://www.apache.org/l
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > >
> > > Nobody is forcing anything.
> > >
> > > Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give
> every
> > > po
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation.
>
> This proposal is now at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal
"As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted i
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Lenni Kuff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
> > which
> > is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
> should
> > be.
> > It's abo
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:17 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Just to clarify.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:54 AM Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> > I will just note that I disagree with adding bureaucracy like this.
> > We already require podlings to submit reports as frequently as
> >
I'm -1 on this.
We have people working for companies who have a vested interest probably on
most PMC's at Apache and why should we have a different set of rules for
the Incubator PMC than any other PMC? If there is a specific concerns that
an individual is acting against the ASF's best interest, t
+1
Niall
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for
> Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below.
>
> The VOTE will be open for at
hat '_' can be removed if that is the policy.
> Wiki updated.
>
I asked on the infra list what the JIRA key format was and whether it could
be changed to include underscore and got the following response:
"They are all uppercase alpha characters. Sadly it cannot be changed.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a
> limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there
> is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated.
>
> https://wiki.apac
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton <
> >
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:31 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing
> reports
> > list.
> >
>
> Hmm very good point. podlings.xml i
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 04.08.2015 18:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > What about the Ignite thread was "unfortunate"? That it was a bit
> > heated at times, or just the fact that there was disagreement? I fear
> > that there's too much bias towards +1'ing things ev
Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports
list.
Niall
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to present the draft board report for additional community input.
> We have reports expected from 19 podlings, 12 reported, 7 did no
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> let me start by saying that I feel proud about the
> rigor with which ASF approaches management
> of the ultimate foundation deliverables: the source
> releases put out by our communities. If you read our
> policy document:
>
+1
Niall (binding)
On Monday, April 20, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/
Looks good to me. +1 to release.
Niall
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. This is our
> third try for our first release. We have resolved all the issues that
> have been discussed in our previous tries.
+1
Niall
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Florian Müller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email.
> The corresponding wiki page is: http://wiki.apache.org/**
> incubator/OlingoPropos
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> First off, thanks for reading my proposal!
>
> Specific comments below:
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> Reply-To: &q
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Gardler
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:20 PM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: R
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> One alternative to going for full-on majority voting is to recognize that a
>> larger group is much more likely to have "noisy vetoes" by requiring that
>> successful votes have n po
+1
Niall
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then
> the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy.
>
> A few releases were made and the status page has been completed:
> http://incub
+1 to Falcon - or whatever name it finalises on!
Niall
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let t
+1
Niall
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
wrote:
> = Ivory Proposal =
>
> == Abstract ==
> Ivory is a data processing and management solution for Hadoop designed for
> data motion, coordination of data pipelines, lifecycle management, and
> data discovery. Ivory enables end
Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a
good vote email.
+1 from me.
Niall
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apach
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe my e-mail has not been seen. Any comments from the IPMC? If not,
> I will discuss the next steps with the Onami devs.
My first thought was "Is this too quick?" - but looking are the
origins and whos involved - then I t
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" task
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator
> should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an
> existing TLP. The Incubator *creates* Apache-style communities. But... Stop.
>
> For these, we
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
>>>
>>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times,
>>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy
>>> community, but that is not a
http://www.ackairos.it/wmc5lt.php?s=lf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Apache Stanbol Project; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the Apache Stanbol Project be and hereby
>is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> Incubator Stanbol podling; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that all responsibil
I see from the discussion threads that you decided to remove people
who had never been active - but were the following people omitted from
the resolution by mistake or on purpose?
Ali Anil Sinaci (70 commits, last in May & voted on graduation & resolution):
http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=fr
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 09:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>> > ...It seems to me that the concept of 'project sponsorship' of podlings
>> > is left over from the days of umbrel
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Let me try this again.
>
>> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
>> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
> is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors,
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine
> new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF policies
>
+1
Niall
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and ac
+1
Niall
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three
> new committers from diverse organizations, added two new PPMC members,
> and m
+1
Niall
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
> Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
> members, and shows a steady growth of commu
+1
Niall
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a draft of th
-1 to the poor way this vote was conducted and your response to
peoples concerns.
+1 for Jukka as the new chair.
Niall
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
> chair and it looks
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: Jukka Zitting
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: February report review
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefe
+1
Niall
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [
RAT report on the source distro looks good.
None of the artifacts (zip or jar files) seem to have the incubator
disclaimer notice.
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
checksums. Rather than just creating 1 signature file and sha & md5
checksums for each file there are
+1
Niall
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier and now shown below, the HISE community has voted
> to retire the project. Following the retirement guide [1], I now call
> the Incubator PMC to vote on confirming this decision. This vote is
> open for
+1
Niall
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all ASF mates,
> I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache Syncope.
> Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
> will be closed on February 10th (Fri) at 9:00 am CET.
> Many thanks in adva
members of the
> Apache BVal Project:
>
> - Albert Lee
> - Carlos Vara Callau
> - David Jencks
> - Donald Woods
> - Gerhard Petracek
> - Jeremy Bauer
> - Kevan Lee Miller
> - Luciano Resende
> - Matthias Wessendorf
> - Matthew Jason Benson
&
Proposal looks good.
Niall
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
> identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
> originally developed by Tirasa, an Italian IT compan
I vote -1 for the reasons I said here:
http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo
Niall
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> dow
+1
Niall
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
> of the proposa
+1
Niall
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
> link to the document in the wiki:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:31 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 11:11 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to clarify, only source code is "released" by the ASF. Yes, there
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
The only thing I really don't have read anything about is, if we can
handle this project from infra-resourcing.
>>>
>>> Joe Schaefer added himself as a mentor, so we can consider that covered.
>
> I just have learned OOo delivers
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/7/2011 10:23 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>>
>> One question about the comment above though: Are you advocating that Apache
>> OOo stick to source-only releases, and avoid
>> building and delivering binaries altogether? Or is your id
I have concerns about the proposal, but not with the ones you raise.
If you're right about the costs, they not going to hit from day one -
as the initial effort will be in building the community and building
something that can be released and very little needed in terms of end
users - and the ASF
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested
> mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here.
>
> This is what I entered into the wiki:
>
> The following mailing lists:
>
> oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:48 AM, wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 07:02:02
> PM:
>
>> >
>> > Otherwise this is like the Baptists telling the Methodists that they
>> > cannot have a church of their own in town, because the Baptists want
> to
&
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to
>> LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't
>> I
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>>
>> It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to
>> LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:04 AM, wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 06:45:16
> PM:
>
>> > I'll lend a voice to the contrary.
>> >
>> > I can't see why splitting a community should be a factor in entry to
> the
>> > incubator. J
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 06:30:06
> PM:
>
>>
>> I agree with you - in this case I think it would be better if IBM
>> collaborated with LibreOffice, rather than seeking to compete. But I
>> could be wrong.
>
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/5/11 11:21 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have tried to follow as much as emails as possible but it'
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 6/5/11 16:50, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Niall Pemberton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> IMO the only negative thing then about LibreOffice is the copyleft
>>> licens
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:44 PM, wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote on 06/05/2011 02:21:01
> PM:
>
>>
>> This proposal raises lots of questions, but the requirements for
>> entering the incubator are not high and so IMO don't need to be
>> answered before
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
