On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:48 AM, <robert_w...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote on 06/05/2011 07:02:02 > PM: > >> > >> > Otherwise this is like the Baptists telling the Methodists that they >> > cannot have a church of their own in town, because the Baptists want > to >> > recruit a larger choir. >> >> It is clear from IBM switching its efforts from Harmony to OpenJDK >> that there are no religious reasons over license. Other ASF people >> have expressed in this thread that in their opinion that is reason >> enough (and I respect that view) - but IBM can't claim that. So I >> think my point still stands. >> > > Give me a citation please where anyone from IBM said the preference of > Apache to TDF/OO was due only to the license?
No, it was my point that that they only negative to TDF/OO was the license here: http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo But please do elaborate on why IBM prefers a new project here rather than contributing to TDF/OO - I am very interested to know. Niall > We're havinh some really good discussion on substantive issues happening > on the list. But I'm not going to waste time refuting points that no one > (to my knowledge) has ever made. > > -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
