RE: Remediation ...

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 14:27 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Ultimately with a suite of 8+ million lines, packed with obscure features, > > and thousands of lines of change a day it is fairly easy to slip things in, > > to the potential detriment of other users of the code. > > Wait. How is an

Re: Remediation ...

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Sam, On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:54 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > The net of all of this is that there will need to be a substantial > public aspect to this entire discussion. Yes, I will probably have > some private discussions with ASF lawyers over time over this matter, > but I can't see any way th

RE: Remediation ...

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Noel, On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:13 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I heard about this, myself, in some specific detail very recently. > I will leave disclosure to the relevant parties, but while it may > or may not be an issue for you ... I rest my case about FUD. It seems hard for me t

Re: Remediation ...

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rob, In the deluge of drivel I lost this gem in your response to my scepticism about how quickly you could provide a binary release: On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 10:31 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: > But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony has done IP > remediation at many

Re: OOo - Lines in the sand and pre-determined conclusions...

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jim, On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 16:14 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > certainly don't help. It just reinforces a perceived division > as well as almost forcing the "other side" to take a defensive > stance. Hey ho; I see my name being taken intravenously ;-) so the longer quote from a private

Re: Proposal for OpenOffice Incubator strategy

2011-06-03 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rob, On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:26 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: > Finally, I think we're exaggerating the difficulty of getting out a > release of OpenOfice. LibreOffice did it very quickly. And so did IBM > with Symphony. This is not rocket science. I am impressed by your

Re: Blondie's Parallel Lines... numerically ...

2011-06-02 Thread Michael Meeks
So, On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:55 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: > Questionable? If only 54 people have checked in code in the last 6 > months, then no amount of magic with source code indentation is going to > get you to 400 developers. If you disagree, I'd like to see the magic you > ca

Re: OpenOffice and the ASF

2011-06-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Ross, On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 12:09 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > However, I do have a binding vote here and therefore I have a > couple of questions for you: .. > Are the goals of the TDF the same as the goals of this proposal > to the Apache Software Foundation. I would say they are sim