+1
(high five!)
Matthieu
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
> active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ran
> that through a new community vote[2].
>
> [1] http:/
bout it on their private list.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Matthieu Riou
> wrote:
> >>> ...
Yeah, the dicussion started on private as Eric mentioned and that's what
triggered the vote on d...@. We should really have re-voted the dev thread to
avoid confusion.
Anyhow, my strong opinion is that Cassandra is ready. Great community, great
contributors, dynamic and fast moving without comprom
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.5.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distri
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> Hudson build machine accounts are created upon request for members of
> (P)PMCs.
>
> Does the Cassandra project have a PPMC? I don't see one in the
> asf-authorization file, and have a request from Eric for an account [1].
>
>
Podlings PPMCs
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:40 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Clutch is showing that HISE mailing lists are not yet setup.
>
> Therefore the automated reminder for monthly reports will
> be going to this "general" list.
>
>
Ah sorry about that, for now we're using the ODE dev list but requesting the
m
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:44, Matthieu Riou
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:24 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2009-11-12 a
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >> So about 40% of the committed code is coming from others and reviewed
> >> by others - great - why not make some of those othe
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:32, Eric Evans wrote:
> >...
> > I agree with this, and as a Cassandra committer I have in the past
> > protested our use of RTC. However, the current work-flow *in practice*
> > is more about having someone, anyone,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:24 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 07:16 +, ant elder wrote:
> >> so about 6 months ago to try to help with problems they were having,
> >> and since then 99% of the commits have been made by only t
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>
> >> As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and
> >&g
bad
> situation.
>
> Again, if the community is OK with it and it looks like the process is
> working
> and everyone is involved or has the chance to be involved, it's not a
> problem.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed November 11 2009 11:09:39 am Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
Hi guys,
What's the take of other mentors and the IPMC on podlings practicing RTC?
I'm asking because some seem to see it as a blocker for graduation whereas I
see it much more as a development methodology with little community impact
and therefore no real influence on graduation. Strong opinions
Thanks David, I was just going to start creating the podling.
Matthieu
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:39 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> I did the first step for you ... added HISE to the
> ReportingSchedule with December, January, February being
> your first three reporting months. Report in November if
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:39 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
> > The ODE PMC has accepted (see vote [1]) the incubation proposal for HIVE
> > [2]. The mentors are Paul, Glen and yours truly.
>
> It is a typo. They mean "HISE" (
s Hedhman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Matthieu Riou
>> wrote:
>>
>> The ODE PMC has accepted (see vote [1]) the incubation proposal for HIVE
>>> [2]. The mentors are Paul, Glen and yours truly.
>>>
>>> After the 72 hours wait pe
Hi,
The ODE PMC has accepted (see vote [1]) the incubation proposal for HIVE
[2]. The mentors are Paul, Glen and yours truly.
After the 72 hours wait period ending May 5th I'll go ahead and create the
podling, providing no prior opposition.
Thanks,
Matthieu
[1] http://markmail.org/message/rtgi
So anyone else willing to mentor HISE? I can act as mentor too but a third
would be nice.
Matthieu
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> Rafal,
>> I think the proposal is reasonable, and wel
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Rafal,
> I think the proposal is reasonable, and well defined scope (a
> particular spec) and nothing that sticks out for me at the moment.
>
> Matthieu@ ; Not signing up to be Mentor??
>
>
I'm already champion so I was waiting to see if ot
On Wednesday, October 7, 2009, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> 2009/10/8 Matthieu Riou :
>
>> Diversity will probably
>> be an issue for the podling but it's not something that has to be solved to
>> enter incubation, just be aware of it.
>
> Well, diversity (as you s
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Rafal Rusin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a chance of developing such project at Apache?
> Details ale below.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Rafal Rusin
> Date: 2009/10/6
> Subject: WS Human Tasks implementation
> To: d...@ode.apache.org
>
>
>
+1
Matthieu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> > Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the
> > Incubator PMC for this
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
> Incubator PMC for this release.
>
>
+1 from me.
Matthieu
> Cassandra is a massively scalable, even
I'm +1 as well. I fully respect Jukka's opinion, I'm just placing my own
line on the other side of the gray area (if that makes sense).
Matthieu
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Gang,
> >
> > Apache Pivot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> I don't mind championing you but as mentioned by others, there will be
>> several hurdles to overcome. To change the license, you will have to get
>> an
>> agreement from everybody who ever contributed a patch to the source you
>> plan
>> to
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, sasaboy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> don't think CLA will be the problem. Althouth a mature project, the core
> and
> all the main components of the engine are written by the core
> developers...the community mostly helped by contributing different
> implementations of some
For sponsorship, you could also consider ODE, workflow is in our charter and
we have some development going on at the moment in that area (although not
XPDL).
When you'll be writing your proposals there are a few points that you should
address as they're likely to raise questions:
* you'll need
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> > There has been some discussion around the Cassandra proposal,
> > and we would now like to officially propose Cassandra to the Incubator
> > for consideration..
>
> > [ ] +1 Accept
If you need one more, you can count me in.
Cheers,
Matthieu
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Ian Holsman wrote:
> > I'll be a mentor. do we need 2 or 3?
>
> That would be nice, yes.
>
> 3 mentors == 3 binding votes.
>
> -
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess once these things are addressed we could look further into it, and
> you could start looking for a project sponsor (db.apache.org perhaps?) and
> some more mentors.
>
As you seem to have been one of the drivers behin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
> and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
> call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
> contributo
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose Stonehenge as an incubator proposal.
>
> Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
> Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best
> practise and interoper
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Garrett Rooney
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to propose that the Abdera project move on to graduate from
> > the incubator and become its own top level project. The proj
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
>
> thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
> from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your support.
> On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [X ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project
>
> +1
>
> I have one request though: could the Buildr team add a "who we
l members of The
> Apache Buildr Project:
>
> - Assaf Arkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> - Alex Boisvert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> - Victor Hugo Borja ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> - Antoine Contal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> - Matthieu Riou ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RE
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Tika community has voted [1] to request and the Lucene PMC has
> accepted [2] graduating Apache Tika to a Lucene subproject. As
> described in in the graduation guide [3], I now ask the Incubator PMC
> to approv
Hi,
A short notification to let you know that Buildr is starting a PPMC vote for
graduation. Expect an IPMC vote next week. Feel free to ask here or on
buildr-dev if you have early comments or questions.
Thanks,
Matthieu
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >> If
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >> Wh
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Since disclaimers are not part of the Apache License, they are no
> > obligated to. All we are trying to do here is to not let our
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Doug. We don't need explicit disclaimers. We can
> encourage them however to mention it somewhere appropriate.
>
+1. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Matthieu
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yep. But then many projects also choose to not push those betas in Maven
> > repos, only pushin
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:55 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
> > I've also looked at the mentors votes, those who are basically running
> this
> > place. I'm a small player but Craig mentors 6 poddlings, Jim,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Do we want users to have easy access to these releases, or to make
> > it difficult? Users need to know about the fact that Apache does
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If this vote doesn't pass then we need to re-write the rules to
> > define how much of a majority overturns the status quo.
>
> I'm
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> >> Of which we have two; released, or not released, and that's a product
> >> of oversight and a [VOTE]. There are no magical in-betweens.
> >
> > As evidenced by this vote this is hardly the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:58 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today i wanted a list of all projects that are
> currently in incubation. However that is not easy.
>
> The two main places are:
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Reporting
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please indicate
> your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal is included
> below for posterity. We're looking for a few more mentors. If there is
Sorry for waking up only now. Before voting I'd like to know how this
poddling would compare to Tashi (see [1]). Sounds to me like there would be
a lot of common ground, no?
Thanks,
Matthieu
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMA
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 September 2008 1:14:53 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > "but they cannot require third parties to not sync it into their
> > repos." --> Is this something Maven PMC is
> > thinking-about/voted-on/discussing? ba
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the vote (and discussions) about the use of extra distribution
> channel is going in a bad direction.
>
> I would like to try to summarize the two positions, see if we could
> not reconcile the two positions and f
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> >Maven is *too* transparent in what it does: it hides the disclaimer,
> >preventing the POLICY of ensuring that users are explicitly aware of
> and
> >agree to use of Incubator artifacts.
>
> Maven doesn't *hide* anything
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I don't know of anybody who goes to actual users and tell
> >> them "here you go, unzip that stuff there, set your
> >> JAVA_HOME and
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
-1
I believe that allowing incubating releases to be tr
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:02 AM, David O'Hallaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The voting appears to have ended, with 14+ votes and zero negative
> votes, and three volunteers to be mentors (thank you!):
>
> 1. Matthieu Riou ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 2. Craig L Russell ([E
So shouldn't this vote get tallied now? Seems that we're well passed the 72
hours.
Matthieu
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator.
>>
>> Tashi's
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator.
>
+1
Matthieu
>
> Tashi's proposal is at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
>
> Thanks!
>
> Doug
>
>
> ---
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the Buildr 1.3.2 release.
The source package and the gem both look good to me. As Ant mentioned, the
disclaimer in the pdf would be nice to have.
+1
Matthieu
> The release vote passed within
> the PPMC wi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:55 AM, David O'Hallaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthieu,
>
> > * The sponsoring entity is the Incubator so I'm guessing you're shooting
> > for graduating as a TLP. What kind of interactions do you foresee with
> > Hadoop for example?
>
> We talked with Doug Cuttin
Hi,
I've reviewed the proposal as well, sounds pretty interesting. I have a
couple of additional questions:
* The sponsoring entity is the Incubator so I'm guessing you're shooting
for graduating as a TLP. What kind of interactions do you foresee with
Hadoop for example?
* IIC Tashi is only a
Same here. +1.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship
> modeling the board whenever possible.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release is primarily to solve the installation problem on Windows
> due to unspecific dependency on RJB. Other changes and solved issues
> in this release are listed below.
>
> The release vote passed within the PPMC w
* Adriano Crestani
>* ant elder
>* Brady Johnson
>* Frank Budinsky
>* Ignacio Silva-Lepe
>* Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>* kelvin goodson
>* Luciano Resende
>* Mark Combellack
>* Matthieu Riou
>* Mike Edwards
>* Pau
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up for vote, the much-anticipated Buildr 1.3 release, the first official
> Apache release of the Buildr project.
Already voted on buildr-dev but a confirmation never hurts: a big +1.
Matthieu
>
> The release vote passe
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html
>
> The artifacts are ava
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
> people are actively following the page or the diffs, so here's a
> summary of my review.
>
> OK:
>
> * CouchDB
> * PDFBox (I'm a mentor)
> * Tik
On 4/9/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Should have voted myself, so +1.
>
> Anyone else able to review and vote on this?
No blockers, +1 from me.
Matthieu
...ant
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the 1.1 rele
On 4/10/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> wrote:
>
>
> > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > i've been a passive subscriber to the tuscany list for quite a while
> > > now and to me, from the lists, i
+1. And thanks for the hard work.
Matthieu
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:10 AM, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, we've updated the release candidate... please review
>
> Take 7 of the vote to release Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating. The
> following things have changed:
> - All necessary
On 3/29/08, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> El jue, 27-03-2008 a las 21:42 -0700, Matthieu Riou escribió:
> (...snip...)
>
> > From what I understand of copyright law, it's not (of course IANAL,
> > etc...).
> > Distribution (or p
On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27/03/2008, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This release is tagged at:
> > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
> > >
> > > -1: ther
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think this is an important topic for future incubator project groups
> to have clarified.
>
> > "The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there
> are at
> > least 3 legally independent committers and
Hi,
We've already discussed this a bit in the past [1][2][3] but no clear
consensus as emerged with respect to diversity and the current graduation
policy. There seems to be growing pain with the following policy paragraph
in the graduation checklist:
"The project is not highly dependent on any s
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > Yoav
> >
> > I have to say I think you have given a very good analysis. I think
> > that QPid has come a huge way towards Apacheness. Diversity is not as
> > great as it cou
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.
> [X] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
You never know if you're ready before really trying :) But from what I've
seen they're close enough. They seem to mostly know what they
On Feb 9, 2008 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
> of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
> proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
> Now it is time to vote on t
On Feb 2, 2008 6:47 AM, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
> > questions!
>
> Nah, it's mostly because the mail threading on this thingie was
> broken a few times. It mak
On Feb 1, 2008 4:48 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:20 -0800, David Reiss wrote:
> > J Aaron Farr wrote:
> > > git could be an issue.
> >
> > Can you explain what the issue is with Git? We have at least seven
> > contributors (three at Facebook, four external
On Feb 1, 2008 2:32 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following up on what David sent out yesterday, I think we're all on
> board with having a single committers pool based upon mutual trust and
> respect.
>
> However, dropping parts of the code feels counterproductive to me, as I
> think
On Feb 1, 2008 1:15 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 12:37 -0800, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 2008 10:04 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > >
> &g
On Feb 1, 2008 10:04 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
>
> > Kelvin, NoNameProposers
> >
> > Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
> > questions! So here I go:
> >
> > Perhaps you can explain why this effort isn't being rolled into th
On Jan 31, 2008 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original source for this proposal can be found at
>
> http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal
>
> and a current snapshot is attached below. Once we have established that
> there is interest, my plan is
On Jan 29, 2008 2:44 AM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I didn't post in response to your original mail - I was in the
> middle of a laptop failure (now recovered with no harm done).
>
> I'm certainly in favour of this as a project. My main concern is that it
> is already relatively
Looks good to me, thanks for correcting the problems mentioned by Sebastian.
+1
Matthieu
On Jan 28, 2008 9:31 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some
> issues.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubato
On Jan 26, 2008 1:28 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
> > Couldn't we setup a "retired projects" Jira project? Or a specific
> module in
> > the Incubator project? If people have some interest on a retired
> pod
On Jan 26, 2008 8:29 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 9:18 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > >
> > > Normally, I would suggest that if we have people wanting to work on a
> > > project, that we bring it back to life he
On Jan 21, 2008 6:00 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> > in committee but not in authorization:
> > ["dashorst", "ekoneil", "gianugo", "henning", "jgenender", "kevan"
On Jan 20, 2008 6:29 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a few people in committee-info.txt who didn't use their Apache
> id so the matching is not perfect but here it is:
>
> in committee but not in authorization:
> ["dashorst", "e
There are a few people in committee-info.txt who didn't use their Apache id
so the matching is not perfect but here it is:
in committee but not in authorization:
["dashorst", "ekoneil", "gianugo", "henning", "jgenender", "kevan", "matt",
"mvdb", "psteitz", "sbailliez"]
in authorization but not in
+1, didn't spot anything more than what's already mentioned and I don't
think this should block the release.
Cheers,
Matthieu
On Jan 15, 2008 12:53 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to release.
>
> I've reviewed the vote thread on the podling dev alias and the
> comments on the
On Jan 14, 2008 7:00 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + The most important responsibility for mentors is to set up the
> > + podling svn repository and give read/write access to the
> repository
> > + to all the committers for the podling. This involves requesting
On Jan 12, 2008 6:10 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 2:00 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 2008 4:58 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 31, 2007 9:14 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jan 12, 2008 6:05 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2008 2:00 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 2008 4:58 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 31, 2007 9:14 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jan 6, 2008 2:01 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > >
> > > probably best to choose one and then change all instances
> > >
> > > [-1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
On Jan 6, 2008 6:20 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 4:39 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > > recent experience suggests that the incubator documentation does a
> > > poor job of helping podlings understand th
On Jan 3, 2008 8:09 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 5:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for this release, and note to developers to have a DISCLAIMER file
> > separately in both source release and the META-INF dir of the binary.
>
> Will
On Dec 30, 2007 2:11 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've been searching for releases by retired podlings in order to
> archive them but can't locate releases for any of them
>
> anyone have any ideas about what happend to them?
>
The only one I know of is Agila and no pub
I agree with Leo, a combination of e-mail and archived documentation would
really be great and a time saver. Thanks for taking care of this!
Matthieu
On Dec 30, 2007 2:37 AM, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > i'm a little worri
Looks good to me as well.
[X] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.1
Matthieu
On Dec 13, 2007 5:53 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2007 11:50 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for
> > permission
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
