Looks good to me as well. [X] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.1
Matthieu On Dec 13, 2007 5:53 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 13, 2007 11:50 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for > > permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA. > > This release contains bug fixes of the Apache UIMA 2.2.0 release > published > > in > > August 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the > > release notes. > > > > We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s > > (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread > > is here: > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200712.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > > > Please review the release candidate here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.1/06/<http://people.apache.org/%7Embaessler/uimaj-2.2.1/06/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Embaessler/uimaj-2.2.1/06/> > > > > There are subdirectories like: > > /bin - that contains the binary distribution files > > /src - that contains the source distribution files > > /rat - that contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some > comments > > /eclipseUpdateSite - that contains the eclipse update site artifacts > > /maven - that contains the Maven artifacts we would like to release to > the > > incubator repository > > > > The SVN tag for this release candidate is: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.1/uimaj-2.2.1-06 > > > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.1 > > [ ] -1 No, because.... > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- Michael > > > > +1 this looks all fine to me. > > i did wonder why the jVinci jar doesn't have a uima- prefix or use the > org.apache.uima package name but it looks fine in the maven repository so > i > guess that doesn't matter. > > ...ant >
