+1 binding
Verified signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE and built from source successfully.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:10 AM Ate Douma wrote:
> +1, carrying over my mentor and binding vote from the netbeans dev list
> vote thread
>
> Ate
>
>
> On 2017-11-21 14:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
office to serve at the
> direction
> >> of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Streams Project,
> and
> >> to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the
> >> scope of responsibility of the Apache Streams Project; and be it further
> >>
The 72 hour window has elapsed and the vote is now CLOSED. With 2
additional binding +1 votes on this list added to the 3 IPMC +1s from the
dev vote, this vote is ***successful***.
Binding Vote Summary:
+1: 5
+0: 0
-1:0
IPMC Voting Record (** Voted on dev list):
Matt Franklin
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release
Apache Streams 0.5 (incubating).
The dev-list vote succeeded with 3 IPMC +1s, so we now request a
lazy-consensus vote from the wider IPMC.
The 0.5.0-incubating release simplifies the build process by co
+1 binding
Verified signatures & hashes
Verified compiles from source
Verified LICENSE & NOTICE
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:43 AM Suneel Marthi wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Checked:
>
> 1. Signatures and hashes are correct
> 2. Compiles from source
> 3. Verified Apache headers
> 4. License and Notice
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:25 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Well, for the End User, he/she can not use Tinkerpop+Neo4j without
> complying with GPL/AGPL.
> If Tinkerpop doesn't require Neo4j and still be useful, then that should be
> Ok.
> If Neo4j is essential to Tinkerpop, i.e. not useful without N
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM Marko Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an
> Apache project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release.
> TinkerPop sees Neo4j as the "reference OLTP implementation" of TinkerPop.
> With Tin
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Good job
> >
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez
> wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreci
+1 binding
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
>
> +1 binding
>
> For the source release I checked:
> - incubating in artifact name
> - signatures and hashes good
> - LICENSE and NOTICE ok
> - All source files have
Apologies for the late reply, but this will have to be -1 from me based on
some of the things Justin uncovered.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +0 as the LICENSE and NOTICE issues are probably serious. Anyone have a
> differing opinion?
>
> I checked:
> - DISCLAIME
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:31 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >> I'll prepare a new release with all test resources with unclear
> >> licensing removed and the tests that require them deactivated for now.
> >
> > That could be an easy short te
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:35 PM jan i wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra > > wrote:
> > > Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not
> > > tell from the result VOTE link
> > >
> >
> > No - with A
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:31 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>
> > Do we have a cause for the continued failure to send reminders?
>
> The script is fiddly and hard to test. It's expanded beyond its
> original s
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:19 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Just to make sure - first month after acceptance in the Incubator a podling
> isn't expected to send their report, right? The point in question is
> Groovy:
> they are working on the report, but I don't think they really have to.
>
> Ple
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:58 AM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> With the chaos of the Members meeting this week it went unremarked,
> but Marvin failed to send out report reminders again. Reports are due
> next Wednesday.
>
> (Other Marvin. The robot.)
>
Do we have a cause for the contin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:07 AM Guillaume Laforge
wrote:
> So ultimately, what do we do?
> Do I (current Groovy project lead, thus project representative) need to
> sign something "on behalf of the Groovy community" or something like that?
> Or we just skip this step altogether since that's the c
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:06 AM Jake Farrell wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> -Jake
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> >http://s.apache.org/KWE
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> >
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> > ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
> > a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week
>
> I don't thin
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:23 AM Julian Tenney <
julian.ten...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> We have two things that are GPL: one is optional, I don't have any problem
> with that. I'm trying to get a bit more understanding of the other one!
>
> But the point is taken: if that component is needed to m
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:45 AM Julian Tenney
wrote:
> Question: I know I've seen this discussed here before, and in any case,
> you guys are the best source for an answer:
>
> Can we have GPL code in a repository as long as that is not distributed
> with the product in a 'official' release?
>
Th
t;>> On 1/31/15, 9:09 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt Franklin
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
> >>>>>
> >>
On Sat Jan 31 2015 at 11:22:15 AM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:55 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
> > Are there guidelines for these "usual considerations"?
>
> (Queue Marvin on the subject of documentation.)
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
>
> My understanding: when a sign
I am excited to see this proposal come to the incubator.
You can count me in for one of the mentor slots.
On Wed Dec 17 2014 at 3:27:17 PM Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> +1
>
> Hi Marko,
>
> Thanks for your proposal. I followed and used tinkerpop for a long time
> and it is indeed a brilliant open s
The good news is that the community is starting to become more active and a
new release is planned before their next report.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 19:41 Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > As per the board report, the Streams podling
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 12:25:33 PM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
> in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
> I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until
> discussed to 0. There's no
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote:
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1.
> This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
> binding, 3 n
CFP should be open to anyone.
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos or brevity.
> On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:36, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on podlings could
> submit proposals about their project. Can they or can’t they?
>
>
> R
Apologies for tardiness in completing the review.
I have reviewed the community and have concluded that it is very active
and
healthy. IMO, #3 in the issues to address before graduation is not
critical
and can be successfully mitigated by documenting the tasks that are
currently
b
Christian is right. We are watching the lists and follow the discussions,
but do look for DISCUSS, VOTE, or MENTOR flags especially.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Taylor,
>
> your mentors should read the mailing lists. Why I would not expect to get
> answers when
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Matt Franklin ODF Toolkit
Missing the ODF Toolkit report for this month.
+1
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greets,
>
> As discussed previously on general@incubator[1], the Tashi community has
> voted
> to retire from the Incubator. Following the retirement guide[2], it is now
> time for an IPMC vote ratifying their decision.
>
> [ ] +1 Ret
zation and blowfish encryption.
>
> == Required Resources ==
>
> === Mailing lists ===
>
> * storm-user
> * storm-dev
> * storm-commits
> * storm-private (with moderated subscriptions)
>
> === Subversion Directory ===
>
> Git is the preferred source contro
+1. If you need another mentor, sign me up.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much
> thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look
> forward to hearing everyone's
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> This message is opening a VOTE to graduate the Apache Curator podling from
> the Apache Incubator as an Apache Top Level Project.
>
> Apache Curator entered the Incubator in April of 2013. We h
bench
> Alan Cabrera ODF Toolkit
> Dave FisherJSPWiki
> Dave Fisher Stratos
> Matt Franklin Falcon
> Matt Franklin Tashi
> Matt Franklin VXQuery
> Ross Gardler DeviceMap
> Ross Gardler Marmotta
>
Hitesh Shah
> > > Paul Ramirez*
> > > Ralph Goers*
> > > Alan Cabrera*
> > > Thilina Gunarathne
> > > Marcel Offermans*
> > > Alex Karasulu*
> > > Chris Douglas*
> > > Andrew Hart*
> > > Deepal jayasinghe
> >
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the follo
AMODEL)
>
> === Other resources ===
>
> We would like to have wiki page located at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/MetaModel
>
> In later development phase a set of database servers (specifically MongoDB,
> CouchDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MS SQL Server (Express), Firebird) should be
t will not be an issue and since the decision
> to donate the project to Apache has gone through our management team, these
> topics are covered from our legal side as well. I will push back into the
> organization to get a more formal statement for the incubation of course.
>
> Kasper
Thanks.
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matt Franklin
> >
> wrote:
> > Can someone with Karma add me to the wiki administrators group?
> >
> > Username: MattFranklin
Can someone with Karma add me to the wiki administrators group?
Username: MattFranklin
--
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos or brevity.
8, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Henry Saputra >wrote:
>
> > Dear ASF members,
> >
> > We would like to propose MetaModel for the incubator.
> >
> > Matt Franklin will be the Champion for this project and the proposal
> draft
> > is available at:
> >
> > ht
the initial drop. Along the same lines, I
> > urge you to go through the the legal FAQ [1] to make sure that there are
> no
> > other dependencies that merit removal or special handling.
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> >
> > Regards,
>
+1 (binding)
On Friday, May 24, 2013, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at least 72h a
Welcome!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Henry Saputra to the Incubator PMC.
>
> Henry, welcome! Please feel free to share a bit about yourself.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> +++
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, Andrei Savu wrote:
> I think we should see this as option and let the podling decide.
>
> In some cases it's useful but most of time it's enough if you filter
> the dev / user lists for messages that contain ANNOUNCE in the subject
> line.
+1
>
> -- Andrei Savu / ax
For the March report, Benson tried to get the Shepherds to self
organize; but it was an unqualified failure. No Shepherd (including
myself) stepped forward to take on podlings for review. The only
reason I ended up reviewing any podlings is that I was preparing the
report for March.
Given that S
Last call for comments on the report. I will commit it to SVN later
this evening.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> I have added a draft commentary to the report in the wiki. Since we
> had no shepherd self-organization, I am asking for an immediate set of
> v
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>> I can give some Shepherd notes for Wave.
>>> I am sorry to ask, but
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu > >wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" task
no docs ATM. What we have been doing is looking at
the podling (mail lists, etc) to get a feel for how the community is
progressing toward graduation and providing feedback. You can see
prior shepherd feedback in previous reports and e-mails to general@
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:24 PM, M
28 PM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> Working on it now. Will have it ready in the morning for review &
> comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On
Wave is scheduled to report this month; but, there is no report
completed in the wiki. If possible, please add your report to the
wiki [1] before the end of Friday.
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2013
-
To unsubscrib
As a new podling, Tez is scheduled to report this month; but, there is
no report completed in the wiki. If possible, please add your report
to the wiki [1] before the end of Friday.
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2013
--
Working on it now. Will have it ready in the morning for review &
comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.
-Matt
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
>
>> On Mo
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Nicolas Lalevée
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The EasyAnt community would like to graduate as an subproject of Ant.
>
> The Ant PMC has just accepted:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201303.mbox/%3CBD5DB6B8-13BC-421F-800C-CE6CB21D7BF4%40hibnet.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:01 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Was there a vote on the ant list to import easyant?
The vote referenced in the original e-mail was held on ant-dev.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2013-03-13, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>> > I hope
On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
> Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains
> at that moment.
I can do it.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies
>
imize conflicts, and I'll do better next time.
Greg is right. We need either a script or just dive in. It shouldn't fall
on you to do the assignments all the time. The PMC is the responsible
body, not just the chair.
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Matt Franklin
> >
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Sorry, I'm really buried. I'll send some out.
The wiki format is hard to read, but it doesn't look like I got any
assignments this month. Anyone want to throw some my way, or do I
have a bye?
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Roman S
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Does anyone feel inclined to communicate anything to the board except
> 'here's the usual podling-by-podling report'
Do any of the directors on this list want additional information aside
from the podling-by-podling report? Are rollup m
PMC vote.
>
> Regards,
> James Masanz
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
> > general-return-39328-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
> > [mailto:general-return-39328-Masanz.James =
> mayo@incubator.apache.org ]
> > On Behalf Of Ma
just externally referenced and pulled in at build or run time?
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matt Franklin
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Masanz, James J.
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree:
>
t/
>>
>> I'll look at the jars and the root NOTICE file.
>>
>> Thanks for your review!
>> -- James Masanz
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: general-return-39325-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
>> > [mailto:gene
OTICE file.
>
> Thanks for your review!
> -- James Masanz
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: general-return-39325-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
>> [mailto:general-return-39325-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org]
>> On Behalf Of Mat
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where is the source artifact? The artifact linked in the vote
thread appears to be your convenience binary release.
* There are compiled jars in the source tree. These need to
I will take a look before Monday at the latest.
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Coarr, Matt wrote:
> Hi, we just need one more Incubator PMC vote for cTAKES version 3.0.
>
> Matt
>
>
> ---
> From: , Pei >
> Subject: Collecting IPMC votes
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the followi
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> To begin with, I realize that I am tampering with the structure of the IPMC.
>
> In some ways, the IPMC is just another project. It has members, they
> are responsible for supervision of source control and releases. In
> other ways, it's v
Nothing really to add to the report. It appears to capture the current
state and next steps well.
One thing, not all of the mentors have signed off yet.
A couple of concerns. Firstly and most importantly, there is no report
completed for this period. Secondly, there doesn't appear to be a lot of
commit activity since October.
Mail list activity has been decreasing, but IMO that is not a concern
because of the holidays, just something to watch.
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.9-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.8-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Franklin resolved PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5.
---
Resolution: Fixed
After examination of the results of this search
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.7-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Franklin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5:
--
Evidence Of Registration:
Searched "Rave" at Trademarkia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Franklin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5:
--
Evidence Of Use On World Wide Web:
Searched for Rave on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Franklin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-5:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for "Rave" p
mes Search
Issue Type: Suitable Name Search
Reporter: Matt Franklin
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more i
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.5-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.4-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the
availability of the Rave 0.3-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial, W3C and o
81 matches
Mail list logo
