On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
> > ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
> > a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week....
>
> I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after
> almost a week of discussions it seems like all the (minor) issues that
> have not come to closure need to be discussed once the podling is
> established. A longer vote would be counterproductive w.r.t these
> issues.
>

+1.  That is the purpose of the discussion phase.  We should all have
enough context to vote one way or another.


>
> So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad
> - that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close
> the vote after the standard 72 hours.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to