On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing > > a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week.... > > I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after > almost a week of discussions it seems like all the (minor) issues that > have not come to closure need to be discussed once the podling is > established. A longer vote would be counterproductive w.r.t these > issues. > +1. That is the purpose of the discussion phase. We should all have enough context to vote one way or another. > > So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad > - that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close > the vote after the standard 72 hours. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >