Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, This is a cool idea. Its like Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) but for data flow/stream systems as opposed to graph systems. Our tag line is "the JDBC for graphs." You would be "the JDBC for streams." :) You might be interested in looking TinkerPop's Gremlin langua

Re: [DISCUSS] S2Graph Incubator Proposal

2015-11-23 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, I just added a ticket describing the benefits of providing Apache TinkerPop support for S2Graph. https://github.com/kakao/s2graph/issues/175 Just some thoughts in case you haven't considered TinkerPop. Good luck, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Nov 23, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Stack

Re: Apache Metrics, Not Apache Humans

2015-11-17 Thread Marko Rodriguez
tp://markorodriguez.com On Nov 17, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > It is not the metrics that vote. Humans do. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:39 PM,

Apache Metrics, Not Apache Humans

2015-11-15 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, I was talking with Daniel Gruno and wrote the following ideas to him. Note that these are just ideas and not based on any real momentary issue or concern -- though a more general concern about how Apache should evolve. Apache should NOT use a binary "podling" / "top-level" model. All projec

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

2015-11-10 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, >> TinkerPop > >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> No. Recently, we have really appreciated Daniel Gruno's (mentor) efforts >> to get our development community more connected by setting up an Apache >> HipChat account for us and i

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

2015-10-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, I concur with this. Once we got one of our mentors engaged -- Daniel Gruno -- its been smooth sailing. You know how we got him engaged? HipChat. He set us up an account and now we can "@Humbedooh" with questions and get responses. No more "Hello?! Please answer our emails..." So yes, op

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

2015-10-12 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, > We hope and trust mentors to wear their hats well. This quote from a colleague of mine has always stuck with me: "Hope is not a strategy." Take care, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > >> On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >> Hi Incubator folks, >> >> I wou

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
n a bi-directional engagement with TinkerPop. Why should they, they are using the software to solve their particular problems and could care less about the "TinkerPop community" as long as those releases (bug fixes/optimizations/features) keep coming. --- &g

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
cast binding votes -- and our podling was largely >> insulated from the problem that so vexes you now. >> >> Participating in wider Apache activities is also its own reward. The >> Apache >> Software Foundation is a worthy institution contributing great value to t

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, > Thought 1: Who is "we" in this scenario? That is, whose budget do you imagine > the $60 coming out of? Me personally. > Thought 2: No, there's no chance that this kind of expenditure would be > permissible under our non-profit status. Of course. I'm mainly speaking as a devil's advocate

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
marketing models currently being posited by the general@ list. Thoughts?, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Sep 14, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > I suppose my concern is exactly what the two replies thus far espouse -- > "human whim." > > T

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
binding votes. If a project finds that >> some mentors are persistently MIA, they should find some new ones. If >> mentors find that other mentors are MIA, then they should describe to the >> project why that is a problem and suggest ways to get additional mentors >>

Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

2015-09-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, It appears that VOTEing in general@ is inefficient and biased. An Apache member will see a VOTE on the list and can choose whether to participate in that VOTE or not. I believe there are problems with this algorithm. The first has to do with efficiency. For instance, Groovy received (out

[RESULT] [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

2015-07-16 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating has passed VOTE with: +1 (3 -- Justin, Rich, Jan) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:25 AM, jan i wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > have fun > jan i > > On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Rich Bowen

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

2015-07-14 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi Incubators, Yes -- I even bug myself. Can any other "binders" review the release, please? Thank you very much, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Jul 13, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > For the source releases I checked: > - incubating in artefact name >

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating Release

2015-07-12 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello Incubators, We are happy to announce TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tinkerpop/3.0.0-incubating/ The source distribution is provided by: apache-tinkerpop-

[RESULT] [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating Release

2015-06-05 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello Incubators, TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating votes are now tallied at: +1 (3) -- Justin, Jean-Babtiste, and Hadrian. 0 (0) -1 (0) We will proceed with the official release. Moreover, Justin, note that we see you final comment and will proceed as recommended. Thank yo

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.0.M9-incubating Release

2015-06-01 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello general@incubators, After 3 rounds of "3.0.0.M9-incubating-rc" releases the last couple of weeks, the participating vendors articulated their confidence in Apache TinkerPop providing an M9 release. The dev@tinkerpop vote passed with: PMC: +1 (4), 0 (0), -1 (0) -- one from mentor.

Re: Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

2015-04-30 Thread Marko Rodriguez
t. We think having these two connectors available with each release makes TinkerPop easier for users and vendors to adopt TinkerPop. I hope this clears things up. Please ask more questions if not. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 30, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote

Helping Neo4j Release an Apache2 API for Apache Projects

2015-04-28 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an Apache project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release. TinkerPop sees Neo4j as the "reference OLTP implementation" of TinkerPop. With TinkerPop's migration to the Apache Software Foundation, TinkerPop 3.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-27 Thread Marko Rodriguez
>>> NOTICE file exists and GOOD >>> No 3rd part executables in source package. >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> Good job >>> >>> >>> - Henry >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez >>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-25 Thread Marko Rodriguez
, at 2:09 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Signature file good > Hashes file good > LICENSE file good > NOTICE file exists and GOOD > No 3rd part executables in source package. > > +1 binding > > Good job > > > - Henry > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-24 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello everyone, We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin wrote: > +1 binding > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> (sending again as

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-22 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Thanks for voting Justin. Appreciate it. > - I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named > gremlin rather than tinkerpop TinkerPop is the project as a whole. Within TinkerPop, there are various components. gremlin-core gremlin-groovy had

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

2015-04-21 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Apologies for any confusion, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 20, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Sending CANCEL reply on behalf of Marko from TinkerPop PPMCs > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >> Hello, >> >

[VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of +1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator. The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

2015-04-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
gt; > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Given the feedback, we have updated the release as follows: >> >>1. The PGP signature is via an apache.org email address. >>2. The DISCLAIMER has been added

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

2015-04-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello everyone, Given the feedback, we have updated the release as follows: 1. The PGP signature is via an apache.org email address. 2. The DISCLAIMER has been added to the binary distributions. 3. Fixed the "Copyright Aurelius LLC" issue in LICENSE. 4. Added Java

[VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 Release

2015-04-09 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of +1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator. The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here: http://mai

[RESULT][VOTE] Incubate TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2015-01-16 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, I would like to thank Apache on behalf of TinkerPop for allowing us to propose our project and providing us mentors able to bring the TinkerPop Proposal to a successful voting conclusion. Our mentor Hadrian asked me to tally the votes, so here goes: + 1 (6 votes) + 0 (1

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-11 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, TinkerPop3 is a complete re-write of TinkerPop2 and TP3 does not depend on TP2 in any way. TP3 was started November 2013 (1+ year ago). We have CLAs for every TP3 contributor. We do not have CLAs for every TP2 contributor. We are primarily interested in moving forward first with TinkerPo

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

2015-01-11 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Is this a fork? > Is there going to be a Trac vs. Bloodhound or OpenOffice vs. LibreOffice > community issues. I don't think such would block incubation, but we should be > fully aware of it if this is so. > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> Gav… >> >>

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-30 Thread Marko Rodriguez
the proposal and only then continue this discussion. It'll be more > targeted and things will go faster. > > My $0.02, > Hadrian > > > > On 12/29/2014 03:30 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >>>

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-29 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Here is how TinkerPop current runs it "TinkerPop-Contributors." 1. If you are a vendor, you get one engineer from your organization to be on TinkerPop-Contributors who speaks on behalf of your organization/product. (~15 people) - e.g. "That API addition will be ex

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-24 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, I had "read somewhere" that you needed 3 people at minimum for the PPMC. I ran the names (Marko,Stephen,James) by our TinkerPop-Contributors list and there was no pushback. Moving forward, if someone does provide sustained, beneficial work to TinkerPop, they are more than welcome to get

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-18 Thread Marko Rodriguez
se sections will have to be edited to bring everything over to > ASF hardware. Please take a look at other proposals listed for an idea and > if you have any questions please let us know > > Thanks > -Jake > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Marko Rodriguez &g

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-17 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello everyone, I have put the proposal on the wiki page. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPopProposal As requested by Roman, I updated the Affiliations section. Note that I would love to tweak more but there is a 1 minute turn around time when I hit 'preview' or 'save changes'

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework

2014-12-17 Thread Marko Rodriguez
ne for your time, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marko Rodriguez > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop >> (http://tinkerpop.com). There