nanoTime, like this one?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#nanoTime()
is there a difference?
Filip
Julius Davies wrote:
Hi, Commons Developers, Incubator,
I've been too busy over the last year to spend much time on incubating
not-yet-commons-ssl, but I just wante
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
graduation process?
The question is how, and it's something
I'd vote -1, if a project graduates, it does so cause the committer
community is healthy and works well together, and all the other factors.
I don't see any reason why a community should have to be re-elected. It
just doesn't make sense. Graduation out of incubator should not be a
popularity con
My vote, fhanik
For information, I'm blind copying incubator private alias.
[X] +1 offer Erik commit privileges in Imperius
[ ] -1 don't (why?)
Here's my enthusiastic +1
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool proposal! I have a couple of questions, just out of curiosity.
On 10/24/07, Ting Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in China. More than 40,000 students has benefited from it. Our developing
website is http://202.117.16.176/ , source code is also available.
All s
I'd be happy to help out and join as a mentor
Filip
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Anyone care to join me mentoring the Imperius project?
Thanks,
Bill
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Accept project Imperius into the Incubator
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:06:00 -0400
From: Bi
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote:
Tomcat
-
We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add
bindings to
APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is
particularly critical as an early demonstration, we ca
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We proposed to develop a policy-based management infrastructure that
automates administrative tasks by executing policies
Sounds good. I will be curious to see the reaction from the HTTP Server
folks, but this sort of thing is very much needed in real-world deployme
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:36 -0400, Jim Hurley wrote:
I'm not going to try and pull a Bill Clinton with "it depends what the
definition of "is" is" but I'd answer that I believe the Jini
Community
views the project as *the* Jini implementation.
But *the* as i
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects
"technology domain" ownership for implementations. I'd never support
"Apache EMail" or "Apache Web".
It would help me if you could explain how these existing TLP names
are d
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig.Russell wrote:
It would appear then that the "Apache Jini" podling would be the
[spec project], and the "to be named" podling the [implementation
project]. Fortunately, the incubator should be warmed up for a
naming discussion.
Apache JINI and Apache JINN?
11 matches
Mail list logo
