Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
graduation process?
The question is how, and it's something no established project has
ever figured out, nevermind our podlings :)...
Hence the suggestion that some of us discussed in December:
re-electing podling committers is a no-brainer for active people, and
gives others a chance to step out.
Make it part of the graduation for the contributors in the podling to
decide if they want to continue or not. the folks who have made the
podling successful enough to graduate should not have to be re-elected.
In the other ASF projects, if a committer has not been active, (s)he
gets a chance to decide if (s)he wants to step out, one does not start a
process of re-electing active one. That seems so backwards.
Filip
-Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
