Re: Looking for a Champion: FuzzyLite

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:52 AM Jason Porter wrote: > > We do have a list of initial committers willing to work on the project. I’m > not sure what you’re suggesting we’re missing. > > Jason Porter This thread is about a different proposal. --

Apache NetBeans dist incubator folder removed

Hi incubator folks, Just for your information, it's almost 1 year since we are TLP. We have LTS release that must be kept for one year. As Apache NetBeans 12 LTS is out I just removed Apache 11 LTS (incubating) from dist svn folder from incubator. Best Regards Eric 'skygo'

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-250) Website build (part 1 - Clutch phase) failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17041115#comment-17041115 ] Eric Barboni commented on INCUBATOR-250: Hi, seems that the following fil

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters

Hi, 72 hours passed, no -1 vote. According to the lazy consensus rules, The vote [1] passed successfully. Best Regards Eric [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e7e13899ff2ac177cd5142612c75e2fa8361ad2 a0ee74293cf1525cb@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

RE: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters

Form updated to simplify. Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Matt Sicker Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2019 21:24 À : general@incubator.apache.org Objet : Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters Secretary received both a CCLA and software grant for this. All

RE: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters

Maybe I should had sentence like that: Identify name recorded for software grant: Dukehoff GmbH And transmitted to the pmc via this link https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5fb0512323d0e12725141d68eb65f6affa8d99d8025c7ea0bd345474@%3Cprivate.netbeans.apache.org%3E Best Regards Eric PS No time

RE: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters

Hi Not sure if I have to do something. But secretary give us feedback on our private list for reception of files. But should not be disclose I guess. I have no access to secretary ml, so cannot help. Best Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Matt Sicker Envoyé : mercre

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache NetBeans - dukescript presenters

the next 72 hours, the vote passes. Best Regards Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

IP clearance related question

Best Regards Eric "skygo"

RE: incubator website guide transferring

Hi Sheng, We will,but this I was only trying to give feedback for updating the website (if it should). It seems that Apache PLC4X hit the same issue a week ago. It seems the good path to follow is the following http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-graduation Regards Eric

incubator website guide transferring

, see requesting graduation. You might also want to check JIRA checklist tickets for projects that graduated in the last month or two. This process is known as "TLP Parent Request" Are the two sections aim to resolve the same objective? Would it be possible to clarify ? Best Rega

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent pom 1

The Apache NetBeans (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent pom, version 1 Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent pom is intended for use in the Apache NetBeans (incubating) maven project and to be parent for the Apache NetBeans (incubating) Mave

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent 1

The voting is closed and has passed with 3 +1, 1 +0, and no -1 votes. +1 binding from Mick Semb Wever and Sheng Wu from general incubator list and +1 from Ate Douma from PPMC vote thread [1] Sorry for the missing KEYS link that cost time :/ Many thanks for the votes Regards Eric PS: In

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent 1

8da672457b98e4f3bafac58a984ca090685e19f420c738437235 We have one +1 binding from Ate Douma (one of our mentor) The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason Thanks, Eric (skygo) in behalf The Apache NetBeans

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

Hi, As Ate mention, we cancel this vote to have better compliance with the naming Best Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Ate Douma Envoyé : mardi 19 février 2019 10:24 À : general@incubator.apache.org Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1 -1 (binding) be

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

that other Apache project have different scheme -- Extracts Copyright 2016 The Apache Software Foundation. Copyright 2014 and onwards The Apache Software Foundation. Who wins :p ? Thank for your advise Best Regards Eric [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubatin

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

release. As Apache Maven convenience binaries will depend on this particular artefact for Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 and (incubating) 9 10 that will have notice copyright dated 2017-2018. Best Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean Envoyé : jeudi 14 février

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

repository limitation ) https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenetbeans-1007/ my key is stored here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/netbeans/KEYS The vote is open for at least 72h Best Regards Eric Barboni (skygo) [1] https://lists.apache.org/t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.3.0-incubating (RC1)

Hey Luciano- I ran ‘vagrant up’ and tried to build using the VM that the vagrant file created for me. You might want to make a note in your README or modify the Vagrantfile to install the proper version of Scala. —Eric On Nov 12, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Luciano Resende mailto:luckbr1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.3.0-incubating (RC1)

: - sigs and hashes good - Licenses present and correct - NOTICE file present - No binary files Thanks, Eric > On Nov 9, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > > +1 (binding, carried over from the podling vote) > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:54 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

> [ ] +1 Graduate Traffic Control from the incubator +1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

uOn Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > Speaking with my mentor hat on, I think this looks good. Hopefully this > thread is quiet because everyone agrees? Thanks for the bump, I re-reviewed the status page and no concerns here either. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafficco

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

Hi Justin- Thanks for the suggestion to reach out to the author for relicensing. He has moved the project under the MIT license. We’ll be updating our LICENSE file and starting a new release vote. —Eric > On Dec 12, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > wrote: > > I’

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

I’ll talk with the rest of the Traffic Control PPMC tomorrow about getting in touch with the author. For now, I’ve also opened a legal discuss question for their opinion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-356 —Eric On Dec 12, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Justin Mclean mailto:jus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

reasoning we apply to the Maxmind .tgz, which is also Attribution-ShareAlike CC-BY-SA 4.0). 1. https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_SecLists_Project 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa — Eric On Dec 11, 2017, at 1:03 AM, Justin Mclean mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com>> wrote: H

RE: [VOTE] Graduate the Apache Trafodion Project from Incubator to a TLP

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 2:03 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Graduate the Apache Trafodion Project from Incubator to a TLP +1 (non-binding) -Original Message---

RE: no one vote on @general@incubator.apache.org for R2.2

Let me cast my non-binding too +1, Regards Eric -Original Message- From: Sean Broeder [mailto:sean.broe...@esgyn.com] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 5:27 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org; Steve Varnau ; Sandhya Sundaresan Subject: RE: no one vote on @general

Podling BugTracking

policy or rule that we can't use choose to use Github for bug tracking? --Eric

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 (Incubating)

The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 (incubating). More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at: http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded here: https://dist.apache.org/rep

Re:[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 incubating (RC6)

- +1, John D. Ament (binding) - +1, Phil Sorber (binding) Thank you, for your support! —Eric On Jun 30, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Phil Sorber mailto:sor...@apache.org>> wrote: Checksums match. GPG sig verifies, but is untrusted: $ gpg --verify apache-trafficcontrol-2.0.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc gpg:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 incubating (RC6)

Hi Incubator PMC- In the past 5 days our vote thread has not yet received any feedback. Could I please request that you consider reviewing and voting on the below release candidate? Thanks, Eric > On Jun 21, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Eric Friedrich wrote: > > Hello Incubator PMC, >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin 0.1.4-incubating [rc2]

HELP-US-OUT.txt ./ui/bower_components/font-awesome/bower.json [1] http://fontawesome.io/license/ —Eric > On Jun 22, 2017, at 11:01 PM, William Guo wrote: > > update text as links, not sure why it was not links in email. > > PPMC vote threads

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.0.0 incubating (RC6)

Fix font licenses in LICENSE and NOTICE Thanks, Eric Friedrich

Re: Looking for GPG key signers in Boston area

Thanks John- My key is already listed there and is present in the KEYS file as well. Doesn’t the key also need to be verified by others at Apache to be considered valid? —Eric > On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:12 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I think all you have to do is upload it

Looking for GPG key signers in Boston area

. Is there anyone in the Boston area (preferably South or metro-west) that would be willing to meet and verify my key ownership? Thanks! Eric

Re: Traffic Control Podling Bundled Dependencies

Thanks John. By vendoring I did indeed mean duplicating code for the purpose of guaranteeing availably and locking the particular revision in use. I’ll clarify and check in with legal-discuss —Eric > On May 16, 2017, at 3:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Eric, > > Some tho

Traffic Control Podling Bundled Dependencies

, include the goose binary in the convenience package - If goose’s bitbucket repo is ever deleted, we can then import code from a previous release tarball into our repo for preservation. How have others in the incubator solved similar problems? Thanks, Eric

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > The git tag for the repository is "RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9": > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/releases/tag/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9 > > The source distribution (also linked in the release notes) is here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos

Re: GPL with exceptions (was Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1))

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 9:21 PM Eric Covener wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:04 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > That's an interesting one. I'm a bit surprised if that would be >> conside

Re: GPL with exceptions (was Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.1.0 (RC1))

onsidered a build tool, but it can be generated during a build. We distribute into reduce the build-time dependencies. Either way, it needs to be considered further. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Release License Audit

ow do other podlings typically handle this requirement? Thanks, Eric

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > We're still missing sign off from Slider and TrafficControl. > TrafficControl's MLs don't seem to work yet, as a result this email includes > the mentors directly. > Reviewed & signed off in the wiki just now. https://wiki.apache.org/incuba

wiki.apache.org/incubator write access for EricCovener

Hi all, can you grant karma to "EricCovener" to edit the incubator wiki for the podling report? https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comman

Re: svn commit: r1753711 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/trafficcontrol.xml

> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1753711&view=rev >> Log: >> add basic Traffic Control incubating project XML from template. Sorry/thanks! -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [IMO] There are no Incubator issues

"Welcome to the community. Go read the wiki. Follow the mailing list. Figure out everything else by yourself! Good luck. Let us know when you think you're ready to be a TLP." Really? One of my co-workers hit me with the line one: "Is that your best work?" Eric. On

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

right to think this? I think you had offered to help kick off incubation. Is that the right path to a contrib project or is there a different way to get there from here? R/ Eric On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > On 11/4/13, 8:45 PM, Eric Whyne wrote: > >&

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

o donate to the community. Is it ip-clearance, since it's a large code donation to an apache project? Is it incubation as a sub-project? If incubation is the right way, would it preclude initiating the ip-clearance now? R/ Eric On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

+1 The authors like the contrib project idea too. On Oct 28, 2013 7:28 PM, "David Medinets" wrote: > +1 for the RStudio integration to be in its own repository. > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Over at Apache Accumulo, we just got a nice bit of code tha

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation as TLP

hanks regards, Eric On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > +1 - binding > > Regards, > Alan > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator > > [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of C

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

Thanks. We will request trademarks to look into it. regards, Eric On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2013, at 22:59, Eric Yang wrote: > > We did the name search in 2009, 2010, and 2012 via different Apache >> processes while we

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

not be an issue, Apache Chukwa (TM) has been listed on hadoop.apache.org for years. Hope this addresses the concerns. regards, Eric On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > -1 (binding) > > I have not seen a successful resolution of this process: > http:/

[VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

(adc) * Ant Elder (antelder) * Ariel Rabkin (asrabkin) * Bill Graham (billgraham) * Eric Yang (eyang) * Grace Huang (grace.huang) * Ivy Tang (ivytang) * Jerome Boulon (jboulon) * Jiaqi Tan (tanjiaqi) * Shreyas Subramanya (shreyas)

Re: binary release artifacts

interest of Apache Foundation to recall those artifacts. There could be users who depends on them. Binary artifacts did not violate any license terms. We appreciate your understanding on the subject at hand. regards, Eric On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:44 AM, ant elder wrote: > Perhaps, but AFAICT

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

My one suggestion would be to group all the historical patterns/commentary at the end of the document. That way, people looking for specific information about current practices will not have to wade through historical information. Eric On 7/2/13 6:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, May 9

Re: [PROPOSAL] Mandatory podling exit interviews

never I had to send an email to "general", because it usually generated a long email thread, and only one or two responses directly addressed my problem." Doing the above will do much to reduce possible contention. Perhaps add the above to the "what to expect" introducti

Re: [META DISCUSS] talking about the overall state of this PMC

o build up some consensus on how to run the experiments. And how to evaluate the results. Essential to establish some metrics that will correlate with success. Then run the experiments for a while (three months, six months?). At the end, you'll have actual data that will inform a decision.

Re: If I were king of the forest

erally a backup for the others in a transition period, such as one of the mentors looking to shed their responsibilities. One point that has come out of the discussion has been a lack of clear responsibility. Adding more mentors dilutes that responsibility. Two allows one as backup for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Curator into the Incubator

[x] +1 (non binding) Eric On 05/03/2013 18:21, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Discussion has settled down so I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of Curator > into the Apache Incubator. > > The vote will close at on Friday, March 8, 2013. > > [ ] +1 Accept Curator into the Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

ri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Andrei Savu > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Eric Sammer > > wrote: > > > > > >> I'd love to be involved if you're actively looking for initial > > committers

Re: [VOTE] Accept Provisionr into the Apache Incubator

. > > == Cryptography == > > Provisionr uses standard APIs and tools for SSH and SSL. > > == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > > * provisionr-private > * provisionr-dev > > === Version Control === > > Git repository > > === Issue Trac

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

nr > >> team commit access _to that tree_. Over time, the Provisionr people > >> earn full committer status by merit, and appropriate adjustments are > >> made to the tree structure. > >> > >> Given the state of the conversation about policy on this subject, I > >> think it would be reasonable to ask you all to talk to the Whir people > >> about this, and see if you an all come to an agreement for something > >> like this in parallel with a discussion here. > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

Curator deserves a dedicated community, especially for the first reason I have listed (client towards multiple servers). Thx, Eric On 26/02/2013 06:10, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> My concern is that we're looking at two "new"

Re: [PROPOSAL] Knox Hadoop Gateway Project

;) Thanks! On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Minder wrote: > Hi Eric, > Let me answer your second question first. > > Q: Is it your intention to provide job submissions and data ingestion APIs > for MR and HDFS, respectively? > A: Yes we plan to progress the project to cover

Re: [PROPOSAL] Knox Hadoop Gateway Project

works DOT com) > Larry McCay (lmccay AT hortonworks DOT com) > John Speidel (jspeidel AT hortonworks DOT com) > Tom Beerbower (tbeerbower AT hortonworks DOT com) > Sumit Mohanty (smohanty AT hortonworks DOT com) > > == Affiliations == > > Kevin Minder (Hortonworks) > Larry McCay (Hortonworks) > John Speidel (Hortonworks) > Tom Beerbower (Hortonworks) > Sumit Mohanty (Hortonworks) > > == Sponsors == > > === Champion === > > Devaraj Das (ddas AT apache DOT org) > > === Nominated Mentors === > > Owen O’Malley (omalley AT apache DOT org) > Mahadev Konar (mahadev AT apache DOT org) > Alan Gates (gates AT apache DOT org) > Devaraj Das (ddas AT apache DOT org) > > === Sponsoring Entity === > > Incubator PMC > > --**--**- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > general-help@incubator.apache.**org > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com

[IP CLEARANCE] mod_macro for Apache HTTP Server

e.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/httpd-mod_macro.xml Thanks, -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: gene

Re: Retirement decision making

+1 on active PMC duties would be fine to ensure continuation of the project. regards, Eric On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 30 November 2012 00:52, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > Hard cases make bad law. The rough parameters of the recent 'small > &

Re: [DISCUSSION] Retire Chukwa from incubation

at neither Kafka nor Chukwa community would be interested. Chris has done the research in Apache, and did not find any possible projects that would be a good fit to shelter Chukwa. regards, Eric On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Let me rephrase the question. Could t

Re: What constitute a successful project?

ins a number of good features and fixes generated by the community. I really appreciate the support by Incubator community to make this possible. Does this sound like a plan? regards, Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Eric

Re: How to grow podling communities

Thank you, Sally. This information is very helpful. regards, Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote: > Thanks, Suresh. Hello Eric, Ross, and IPMC members. > > We --ASF Marketing & Publicity-- are happy to work with any (P)PMC on a > project's publicity

Re: What constitute a successful project?

informed, and collective wisdom can decide the proper votes base on facts. This will save IPMC and Chukwa PMC time and energy to make best possible decisions for Chukwa community and let Chukwa community focus on the goal of it's charter. regards, Eric On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:36 AM, S

Re: What constitute a successful project?

ng through logistics with my employer to get approval. While I did not write new code for Chukwa for the past half year, Chukwa continue to receive patches from the following individuals: Noel Duffy Jie Huang Sourygna Luangsay Abhijit Dhar Saisai Shao Ivy Tang Prakhar Srivastava Eric Speck Some p

Re: What constitute a successful project?

from mentor position, therefore, Chukwa will need a new mentor, and one of Chukwa contributor Sourygna Luangsay volunteer to be the motivator for Chukwa development if Chukwa is voted to stay for another 6 months. regards, Eric On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fond

Re: How to grow podling communities

new projects are proposed, when projects are at risk, and when they think about graduating? Recognizing that everyone here has limited resources, I don't think what's needed here is much more than a little bit of capturing existing known data on a wiki page or three, perhaps a tw

Re: What constitute a successful project?

on of the development. Of course, this plan can only carry out base on the voting result in general@incubator. regards, Eric On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 20

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

+1 (non binding) Eric On 11/11/2012 19:44, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi all guys, I am submitting a proposal that has been open for discussion for some days (with the former name of Mayhem), so now submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator. Vote will be open for

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

unit tests... I we want to keep frontier between these components (as well on a community as on a code dependency), then one big git repo doesn't make sense. I am more interested in a unique platform based approach (although keeping the modularity). Thx, Eric On 07/11/2012 16:31, Roman

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

On 06/11/2012 12:58, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Eric! I tend to think that 'Less is more', that 'git is now a defacto standard', and that releasing all Mayhem components at the same time, with the same version number (even if there is no change for some of them) is easier

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

d a community around cool >> code/projects or being able to use the last "� la mode" scm tool ? > > as I wrote in a previous message, I personally just need a SCM that > allows me continue developing software in a comfortable way :) > Mohammad, Eric, maybe SVN fits better

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

On 02/11/2012 13:32, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi Simone... On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Mohammed! IMO it would be easier to move into a Git repository, which I will help in setting it up. IMO, it will also be helpful for ASF Git support to have more projects

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

On 01/11/2012 20:23, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Eric Charles wrote: My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? Done. Thx Marvin Marvin Humphrey

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi Simo, oh, I forgot that mentors need to be part of IPMC. Mohammad has stepped in, so I suppose you have the quorum. Ping me if you miss one day some mentor, I would then apply to the IPMC. Thx, Eric On 01/11/2012 12:09, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Eric! sure I added you, I wonder why you

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

I am +1 for git. Eric On 01/11/2012 12:04, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Mohammad, what about having SVN+Git mirror? I personally just need a SCM, don't have a strong preference, so recommendations are more than welcome! What do you suggest? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi Marvin, Definitively need to take more time to read the doc. My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? Thx, Eric On 01/11/2012 14:15, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Eric Charles wrote: I tried to add myself

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

to follow the project and help if needed. Is a mentor also allowed to commit? Thx, Eric On 01/11/2012 08:17, Eric Charles wrote: I was waiting this since a long time, especially since guiceyfruit is not officially update to guice3. It's great time to do this, as more well-known 3rd partie

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

1 and thx again, Eric [1] http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/10/governator-lifecycle-and-dependency.html On 31/10/2012 22:16, Christian Grobmeier wrote: I like that proposal (you have guessed it as I signed up to mentor). Guice is something cool as I found out recently. And I really like the lo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

[X] +1, bring Blur into Incubator Eric On 07/20/2012 06:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

by are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Flume Project: > > * Aaron Kimball kimba...@apache.org > * Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org > * Ahmed Radwan ah...@apache.org > * Arvind Prab

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

it was within a response to a similar thread on our private list. I'll start a thread on our dev list with the same thoughts for the larger community to comment on. I welcome your contribution to such a discussion! Thanks. > > > Ralph > > > On May 23, 2012, at 11:48 PM, Er

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

in my prior post but here you are making my > point exactly. I participate in several other Apache projects. Wading > through 1200+ emails per month that are largely Jira/Review noise makes it > very difficult for me to find posts that have any value. As a consequence I > am largely forced to simply delete everything generated by he Review tool > and Jira. And I'm a mentor. I just don't see how newcomers are going to > find this style welcoming. > > Ralph > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com

Re: Chukwa status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "April2012" by EricYang)

on user mailing list in the past month, but momentum and traction is still a concern. I plan to update the report per Bernd's recommendation. regards, Eric On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the early report, Chukwa! > > On Thu, Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

110rc1/ > > The tag to be voted upon: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc1/ > > The KEYS file: > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/flume/KEYS > > Changes since last build: > * FLUME-1032. Fix Flume NG build for binary di

Re: subversion committer access for podding project

Thanks Craig. :) regards, Eric On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > This request was completed on January 20 based on your request. > > Craig > > > On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> &

Re: subversion committer access for podding project

Hi Richard, The result thread was sent to private@incubator.a.o on Jan 17. I am not sure how to reference to private mailing thread, but I will send you a copy. Thank you for your help. regards, Eric On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > On 02/07/2012 03:19 PM, Eric Y

subversion committer access for podding project

chair to grant access. How should we proceed from here? Thanks regards, Eric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Mentor could lose interests in a project over time due to various kind of reasons. Perhaps, It is time to deconstruct mentor idea and promote ppmc to ipmc after making incubating release(s) and only allow incubator project to graduate after promoted ppmc has mentored another project to make inc

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Eric Yang Committer: +1 Ahmed Fathalla Contributor +1 Mohammad Tariq The vote is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time to review the release. regards, Eric On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> The voting

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

: Chris Douglas:+1 Ralph Goers: +1 Ant Elder: +1 regards, Eric On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:55 AM, ant elder wrote: > +1 > > Same comment on the NOTICE file as over here: > http://apache.markmail.org/message/hlfebouyg3r5w27i > >   ...ant > > On Fri, Jan 2

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out? regards, Eric On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members. >> Have they voted? > >

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

This is a reminder to vote Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 3. We are still missing 2 IPMC votes to close this vote. If someone could take a look, it would be greatly appreciated. regards, Eric On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checksum and

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

+1 On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 AM, sebb wrote: > On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.  This will be the first incubator >> release for Chukwa. >> >> The source tarball artifact is available at

  1   2   3   >