On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:04 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > That's an interesting one. I'm a bit surprised if that would be considered > OK for this scenario. Sure, HTTPD is usually used as a standalone server. > What happens if you embed HTTPD in your own data parser? You're > effectively violating that license. This specific case seems very Cat-X to > me. Similar to the JSON license "no evil" clause. I actually don't see > how this is a build tool (though its been 5 years since I've had to deal > with make).
It cannot really be considered a build tool, but it can be generated during a build. We distribute into reduce the build-time dependencies. Either way, it needs to be considered further. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
