moving on, plus Incubator facilities documentation and tools

It is time for me to move on from the Apache Incubator. I feel that i have done as much as is possible. There is various documentation to try to assist people and projects to help themselves: http://incubator.apache.org/facilities.html http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013 If any

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

limited use. > > > > If you really really want this I'm not going to object but I think it should > > be acknowledged that it's often inappropriate. > > > > David Crossley: > > > >> Also for poor Clutch to try to keep up with the inconsistency o

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote: > On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings > >> past and present in a single rather long page. > >> > >> It might be better

Re: Marking retired podlings in SVN

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, at 07:09 AM, sebb wrote: > > Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file > to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired? Good idea. Add that as another step to: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html Ideally it would be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014, at 06:43 AM, sebb wrote: > On 5 March 2014 19:26, Henry Saputra wrote: > > The ODF Toolkit website [1] does not indicate which ones are the mentors. > > > > Do you mind just listing them in this thread for quick FYI? > > The canonical location for podling status is here: > >

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > I dropped the ball and didn’t get the Storm report in. But I also noticed > that Storm wasn’t included in the template for this month’s report. > > I’m assuming that was just an oversight, correct? But Storm is not due to report: http://incubator.apache.o

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

Stack wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > > As an anti-spam measure, ASF wikis must whitelist contributors. See > > the top of . > > > > Please let us know your wiki username (not Apache ID) and we will add > > you to the ContributorsGroup whitelist. > > Michae

Re: Permission to edit wiki

Rhys Ulerich wrote: > May I please have access to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator so I > might edit the content for the log4cxx2 podling? My name there is > 'RhysUlerich'. Done. -David > Thank you, > Rhys - To unsubscribe, e-

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > Just an FYI, BatchEE did not receive a notice from Marvin. Should we > change their reporting group? I now investigated their settings in content/podlings.xml The "reporting" stuff seems okay, monthly for the first three months.. They are correctly in this month's

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

y. So the next run of Clutch would reflect any changes there. -David > David Crossley wrote: > > Dave Fisher wrote: > >> On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> > > >> > January 2014 Incubator report timeline: > >> > > >&g

Re: January 2014 Incubator report timeline

Dave Fisher wrote: > On Dec 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > January 2014 Incubator report timeline: > > > >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2014 > > FYI - Helix has graduated so I have removed it from the report. In the interests of the whole Incubator would Heli

Re: permission to edit wiki

Done. -David Neng Geng Huang wrote: > Hi! I would like to add something to the wiki, can I please have access? > My login name is "Neng Geng Huang" > > Thanks! > > Huang > > -- > -- > Mr. Huang Neng Geng > -- > Associate Professor > Scho

Re: Question about jar files in svn.

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greg Trasuk wrote: > > > > Thanks everyone for the input. To summarize, it appears that the consensus > > argument is: > > > > - Jar files are not prohibited by policy in project repositories (svn), > > although they may not make a lot of sense. > > - Source distribution

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ant elder wrote: > > > > All the stuff required to be checked when voting on a release should be > > documented in the ASF doc about releases. That its not in that doc suggests > > its not required. If someone thinks something is required then they should > > go get consens

Re: Subscribtion at the private list

Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi all > > I'm still not subscribed at the private incubator list. I was sending a > request, but for some reasons, I'm not registred yet. Can someone help > me to get on the private list. Thanks! Gee, that is not good. If you still get no result, perhaps try contacting

Re: permission to edit wiki

I added that. -David Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi I would like to add something to the wiki, can I please have access? My > login name is "Matthew Hayes". > > Thanks! > Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. Here is my +1 -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@in

Re: Changing moderation settings

Nathan Marz wrote: > How can I change the moderation settings for the Storm user and dev lists? > I'm getting enormous amounts of moderation emails (including lots triggered > by JIRA). Is there a way to whitelist accounts, turn off moderation, and/or > approve in bulk (like via a web interface)?

Re: IP Clearance before releasing

ant elder wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > If we deleted every > > release from the main Foundation distro area that had some divergence > > from some policy, no matter how tiny, my suspicion is that the distro > > area would become rather sparse. > > Yes quite. And lets not forget how t

Re: Ripple reports

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> > >> i just added the ripple report for december (its the same as november). > >> > >> We were to late in november. however the report template generator didn't > >> include us in generation. > > OK, I see what h

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > In response to Bertrand's proposal at , I've created > a draft release verification checklist: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist Thnaks for your huge efforts Marvin. > [ ] Incubation disclaimer is present and correct.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Raphael Bircher joins the Incubator PMC

Raphael Bircher wrote: > Am 27.11.13 20:57, schrieb Marvin Humphrey: > >Greetings, > > > >The Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Raphael Bircher and he > >has accepted. In addition to his work here in the Incubator, Raphael is > >active in Apache OpenOffice. Thanks again. > Thanks

Re: Transition Incubator dist area

On Nov 20, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Nov 18, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > > If I've done everything right, it should be possible for Infra to flip the > > switch and use new-style dist.apache.org synchronization at the incubator/ > > level. > > Infra flipped the switch today. We now u

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

David Nalley wrote: > > (and incidentally you don't seem to be moving older versions (0.6.0, > 0.6.1, etc) to the archive when promoting a new release. - see > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive for more) Anything that is in the "dist" area is automatically archived, as explai

Re: INFRA-6774

ev committer https http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#commit-403 (although that seems to use old terminology). http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn Would someone please clarify the docs. -David > David Crossley wrote: > > Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > >> Whe

Re: INFRA-6774

tp://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html see the Transferring > resources #3.2 user Website Thank you! One wonders why projects are not following these guides. There is also clear direction here: http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-graduation -David > David Crossley wr

Re: INFRA-6774

Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > When I tried to commit the change, I get: > > svn: E175013: Commit failed (details follow): > svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/asf/!svn/me' forbidden Are you able to commit to other stuff? e.g. your podling status page or to podlings.xml file. You would have had that acce

Re: INFRA-6774

David Crossley wrote: > Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > > > Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have > > curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org? > > You asked this a few hours ago on infrastructure@ and were given > complete and ad

Re: INFRA-6774

Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have > curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org? You asked this a few hours ago on infrastructure@ and were given complete and additional answers by various separate people. Now you have more people

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean wrote: > ... > >> My guess is that "Lazy Majority" is used because Majority implies more > >> than 50% of possible voters need to vote. > > > > My guess is that it is a misprint

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling

Andrei Savu wrote: > Hi - > > We voted [1] to retire the Provisionr podling form the Apache Incubator. > Following the retirement guide, it is now time for an IPMC vote to ratify > the decision. > > [ ] +1 Retire the Provisionr podling > [ ] +0 Neither here nor there > [ ] -1 Do not retire the

Re: Transition Incubator dist area

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Hello general@incubator, > > Infra has requested that we perform some cleanup of our distribution area. > Earlier this week, both Allura and VXQuery experienced difficulties with > synchronization between their dist.apache.org release directories and the > main mirror at <

Re: the Voting Status monitor is overloaded

Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote: > > > > Release Apache Stratos 3.0.0 Incubating RC4 > > Will send the result correctly again. > > Thanks. Cleared now. > > They added (passed) at the end of Subject. FIXME: perhaps voter/voter.py needs additional code to handle such -David --

Re: the Voting Status monitor is overloaded

DeltaSpike for Graduation to an Apache Top Level Project This was a community graduation vote. Used "Fwd:" but not summarised. (FIXME: perhaps voter/voter.py needs additional code to handle such "notices".) --- David Crossley wrote: > If the proje

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

Jakob Frank wrote: > Hi all, > > the Marmotta podling, whose goal is to provide an Open Platform for > Linked Data, entered incubation in December 2012. Since then, the > codebase has stabilized and two releases were published following ASF > policies and guidelines. > The community has grown, two

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ambari Graduation Resolution Draft

I compared the text of your resolution to that of the template. All appears to be okay. Good to see a solid number of people on your initial PMC. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For addi

Re: Shepherding November 2013

Andrei Savu wrote: > Something is fishy. I haven't received any "Shepherd assignments ..." email > for November and I've done no reviews. It's not clear to me how my name got > added as a reviewer for Tez. Dunno about email. I added a section to explain the process a bit: http://incubator.apache.o

Re: Shepherding November 2013

John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > Can anyone volunteer? Or only IPMC? > > I'd like to volunteer to help you guys out next month. Anyone can. Please. I gather that you just need to add/maintain this file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/shepherds.json -David

Re: projects "graduated" need to tidy up

David Crossley wrote: > Jake Farrell wrote: > > > > I've started to clean up the voter status page ... Thanks. Let us hope that that enourages podlings to continue to follow through. > ... and have been finishing the > > incubator closing steps for projects that hav

Re: projects "graduated" need to tidy up

e steps will make it easier for the tools to > function as intended Do the instructions need some tweaking to explain that the "enddate" needs to be added for each? -David > Chukwa, DeltaSpike, jclouds, Tashi > > -Jake > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:45

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

David Crossley wrote: > Upayavira wrote: > > I have one (hopefully) simple question for those more familiar with the > > ASF\s bylaws/etc. > > > > As I understand it, the board has delegated responsibility for the > > incubator, and thus incubator podli

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

Upayavira wrote: > I have one (hopefully) simple question for those more familiar with the > ASF\s bylaws/etc. > > As I understand it, the board has delegated responsibility for the > incubator, and thus incubator podlings, to the Incubator PMC and its > members. Thus, it is only members of the In

who are your Mentors

I reckon that these lists are not complete. Would people from each podling review the generated lists at: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ a list of all current podlings with Description and Mentors, etc. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#mentors all people listed and their associated

Re: [IMO] There are no Incubator issues

Martijn Dashorst wrote: > ... Well said. Hooray for common-sense and taking ownership. We must remember that we are all individuals. The ASF enables us to do what we want. We each need to take the initiative. -David - To unsub

Re: projects "graduated" need to tidy up

ite docs. If so, then i would be horrifed that they have not told us. -David > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:26 PM, David Crossley wrote: > > John D. Ament wrote: > > > Well, I can appreciate the frustration. > > > > > > I'm willing to help clean up some of

Re: projects "graduated" need to tidy up

ct.html#incubator -David > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM, David Crossley wrote: > > > John D. Ament wrote: > > > David, > > > > > > On that note, how come DeltaSpike is still listed as incubating at [1] > > > > > > Note the table on the 3rd b

Re: the Voting Status monitor is overloaded

If the projects that are listed there cannot make the effort to clean up, then do not be surpised if your subsequent vote threads are overlooked. This is also not fair on the other projects, especially new ones. -David David Crossley wrote: > It seems that the brilliant "Voting Status&

projects "graduated" need to tidy up

continue such behaviour as TLPs. (Sorry if i come across as frustrated in these threads. I certainly am, but trying to curb it.) -David > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, David Crossley wrote: > > > David Crossley wrote: > > > Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > > Hi D

Re: missing dev mail list for BatchEE and Sirona

David Crossley wrote: > Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi David > > > > not sure what you mean but list are working AFAIK. We got batchee mail > > this morning again and I got some sirona mails yesterday > > The "archives". Clutch gathers the mail lis

Re: missing dev mail list for BatchEE and Sirona

rs -David > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2013/11/7 David Crossley : > > > > Those two reminders are intended

missing dev mail list for BatchEE and Sirona

Those two reminders are intended for BatchEE and Sirona. Their email dev list archive is not yet available, so this goes to general@ list. Clutch does detect their commits lists, but not their dev lists. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/#batchee.incubator http://mail-archives.apache.org/

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

Andreas Neumann wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, it looks like the name Twill is appealing > enough. I will update the proposal with the new name. > I would also like to put the proposal on the incubator wiki (at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TwillProposal), can you please give me > the p

Re: Please add my account to the ContributorsGroup

James Taylor wrote: > Hello, > Please add my account, James.Taylor to the ContributorsGroup as I'd like to > create a wiki for a new proposal for an Apache Incubator project. Done. > Thanks, > James > -

Re: Wiki access

P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > "P. Taylor Goetz" > > Thanks and my apologies for being a little thick regarding the right process. > I'm kind of juggling eggs right now... Okay, done now. I did not realise that spaces were allowed. -David > P. Taylor Goetz > Software Architect > > Health Market Sc

Re: Wiki access

P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I'm requesting access to the incubator wiki in order to update the storm > podling monthly board report. As explained at the front page top-right, you need to tell us your Wiki username. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ -David > Thanks in advance. > > P. Taylor Goe

Re: the Voting Status monitor is overloaded

David Crossley wrote: > > It seems that the brilliant "Voting Status" monitor > has fallen into disrepair. Partly due to people > not properly following up with a clear RESULT tally > and partly perhaps inadequacies of the monitor script. > > Follow the top-le

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

David Crossley wrote: > > The problem seems to be getting worse. Some people make > source changes to docs, but then do not follow through > to publish those changes via the CMS. Then other changes > bank up behind the logjam. > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.ht

the Voting Status monitor is overloaded

It seems that the brilliant "Voting Status" monitor has fallen into disrepair. Partly due to people not properly following up with a clear RESULT tally and partly perhaps inadequacies of the monitor script. Follow the top-left link from the Incubator home: http://incubator.apache.org/ Items colou

Graduated projects need to clean up (Was: svn commit: r1532364)

Please do not hand-edit the generated files. Graduating projects need to follow a number of steps. The docs do explain those steps. Clutch tries to help by linking to some relevant docs. See the notes against the "DeltaSpike" entry and other "graduated" projects: http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.

[RESULT][VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

Adjusting the email Subject to "[RESULT][VOTE] ..." to enable the voting status monitor: http://incubator.apache.org/facilities.html#voting-status -David Dave wrote: > I am officially closing the vote. We have 11 binding +1 votes, 4 > non-binding votes and no -1 notes. Usergrid is now officially

Re: Apache project bylaws

Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Ross Gardler > wrote: > > > > +1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there > > needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper. > > > > The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that t

Re: Apache project bylaws

Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like one of the things that fell between the cracks when Apache Flex > become a top level project was drafting up and accepting a set of bylaws. > > I see nothing about bylaws on the incubator website, including here [1] where > I would expect it to be. > >

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2013 ([ppmc])

Marvin (the other Marvin) wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system ... This is intended for Storm new podling. The default mailing list is general@ because their mailing lists are not yet operational. I wish that the Subject would include the project name. If an

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

David Crossley wrote: > Doug Cutting wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > > > This passes, with lots of +1 votes (plenty by PMC members) and no -

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

Doug Cutting wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. > > This passes, with lots of +1 votes (plenty by PMC members) and no -1 votes. > > Thanks for voting. > > Doug Someone from the Storm project nee

Re: perms on wiki

Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi, > > anyone can give me permissions to edit the wiki please? (i would like > to create a proposal) Yes, but you do need to provide the crucial information: your wiki username. See the top-right of http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ -David > Romain Manni-Bucau > Tw

Re: Castafiore framework proposal to incubator

Kureem Rossaye wrote: > Hello community, > > please find below a proposal I wish to submit to the ASF. I am new here and > was told that I could paste the proposal here. So here we are. That was misleading to simply say that. There is quite a process which will all be beneficial. > Awaiting rep

Re: Followup to VXQuery July 2013 report

ant elder wrote: > Hi Marvin, I had a look, that README being pointed to is just build > instructions on how to build the svn trunk isn't it, so not to some > released artifacts. Thats allowed isn't it, i'm pretty sure other projects > and podlings have done something similar anyway. Is it that the

Re: Write access to wiki

Nathan Marz wrote: > May I have write access to the incubator wiki (username NathanMarz) so that > I can add a proposal for Storm? > > Thanks, > Nathan Done. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach

svn configuration for all committers

See: http://apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config -David sebb wrote: > On 18 August 2013 16:27, wrote: > > Author: dashorst > > Date: Sun Aug 18 15:27:12 2013 > > New Revision: 1515136 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1515136 > > Log: > > Added IP clearance for Wicket Guide >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, Marvin. > > We can defer creating the user list for a while. > > Since Sentry is a security project, we expect security holes to be reported > and we'd like to keep those discussions on a private list. I understand > private@ is meant for

Re: Canonical podling count

Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > Why not take it from the number Clutch reports? > > Ah, here, just above the table: > > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#current Also see http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#data which shows the "clutch.txt" list of current podling

Re: svn commit: r1496076 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/stratos.xml

David Crossley wrote: > Please fix this. It breaks the build of the Incubator website. > The xml error is: >[anakia] Error: The string "--" is not permitted within comments. >[anakia]Line: 12 Column: 8 As explained at the top of the template file from which

Re: svn commit: r1496076 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/stratos.xml

Please fix this. It breaks the build of the Incubator website. The xml error is: [anakia] Error: The string "--" is not permitted within comments. [anakia]Line: 12 Column: 8 -David az...@apache.org wrote: > Author: azeez > Date: Mon Jun 24 15:02:55 2013 > New Revision: 1496076 > >

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

+++++++ > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: David Crossley > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:11 PM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org

please follow through to publish doc changes

The problem seems to be getting worse. Some people make source changes to docs, but then do not follow through to publish those changes via the CMS. Then other changes bank up behind the logjam. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html -David --

Re: [MENTOR] Re: Missing Release Distribution in Clutch Status?

Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Sorry I missed this. > > Real quick CC to general@i.a.o. I'm not an expert in the Clutch. > IPMC peeps that know the clutch, Knox has a release in the dist > area: > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/knox/ > > > (^^ for example the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

Good on you. Keep it up. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

David Crossley wrote: > Marvin sends a summary to IPMC private@ list. It did include both > MRQL and Ambari. > > They are listed in this summary (generated from content/podlings.xml): > http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt > and in this month's data list: > h

Re: marvin report reminders

Alan Cabrera wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Alan Cabrera wrote: > >> > >> Does anyone know where the Marvin code bits live? > > > > At > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools/board_reminders/ > > > > Ther

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

those that Marvin is being blamed for. -David > David Crossley wrote: > > > > Marvin sends a summary to IPMC private@ list. It did include both > > MRQL and Ambari. > > > > They are listed in this summary (generated from content/podlings.xml): > > http://incu

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

Marvin sends a summary to IPMC private@ list. It did include both MRQL and Ambari. They are listed in this summary (generated from content/podlings.xml): http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt and in this month's data list: http://incubator.apache.org/report_due_2.txt -David Benson Margul

marvin report reminders

Alan Cabrera wrote: > > Does anyone know where the Marvin code bits live? At https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools/board_reminders/ There are various discussions in the Incubator archives about how the data lists (for mail addresses for each project due to report each mon

Re: A lot of reports missing these period

Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Folks, > > its reporting time and at the wiki are a lot of them missing! > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2013 > > Ambari > Blur > DeltaSpike (hasn't it graduated?) The Voting Status page indicates that they have not finalised their graduation vote, nor commence

Re: configuration of svn [Was: svn commit: r1477438 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/jclouds.xml]

ops across group members. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > > > [1] > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#repos-dictated-config > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, David Crossley > > wrote: > > > How do new files that

configuration of svn [Was: svn commit: r1477438 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/jclouds.xml]

How do new files that are added to svn, get these properties set? We cannot see the diffs. There are also other new ones in SVN that do not have eol-style set. http://apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config Is it that people do not have correct configuration, or is this the CMS? -Da

Re: improve podling management and status information

David Crossley wrote: > There is still some duplication of information for the status > of each podling between the main file [1] and each podling > status web page. We also need each podling to take more care > of their status metadata. > > One aspect is the Sponsor/Champion/M

improve podling management and status information

There is still some duplication of information for the status of each podling between the main file [1] and each podling status web page. We also need each podling to take more care of their status metadata. One aspect is the Sponsor/Champion/Mentors information. To reduce this duplication and o

Re: fix entry and exit documentation etc.

David Crossley wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > Reviewing this, the document you added a link to contains bugs. > > Yes, there are many issues with Incubator documentation. > Thanks for detecting some of them. > > Procedures have been changed, so doc

fix entry and exit documentation etc.

Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Reviewing this, the document you added a link to contains bugs. Yes, there are many issues with Incubator documentation. Thanks for detecting some of them. Procedures have been changed, so documentation needs to catch up. Every committer has access to these documents. I

Re: Might I have permission to edit the wiki (add a page)?

Done. Added you to ContributorsGroup. -David Brian McCallister wrote: > BrianMcCallister > > Thanks! > > -Brian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@i

Re: all podlings please update and maintain project metadata

Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Shane Curcuru wrote: > >> > >> Separately, I'd love to hear any comments about how this kind of > >> requirement is expressed in the graduation guides. I.e. is it clear, > >> even to normal humans (i.e. 99.99% of the world who are not Incubator

Re: Proposal for better docs on trademark research (Incubator)

Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > >> +GitHub > > >> +SourceForge.net > > >> +Google Code > > >> +Ohloh > > >> + > >> href="http://

Re: all podlings please update and maintain project metadata

email below. -David David Crossley wrote: > > Would all podlings please update and maintain your project metadata. > It is up to your project members. > > This metadata is used by various processes to assist with managing > the many projects in the Incubator. Please do not exp

Re: Request for edit karma for incubator pages in http://wiki.apache.org/incubator

Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask for karma to edit proposal for incubator project. In > particular http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal > > My wiki user name is "Henry > Saputra Done. However i am not sure how to d

Re: Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

publish the generated changes when they are ready. I did that now. The next time that someone runs Clutch (there are notes on that page) then it will pull together any pending metadata changes. -David > On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote: > >Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Dev

Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

other stuff. -David David Crossley wrote: > Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > > > Etch has graduated and is now a TLP, correct? > > > > It's board reports should now go directly to board@ from the PMC chair. > > As explained in the Incubator

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])

Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > @(tez|knox).incubator.apache.org lists had been created. Thanks. When Clutch detects that messages are flowing to the mbox then it flags the list as ready. They are not yet at the index page of http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ -David > David Crossley

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])

These are for the new podlings Knox and Tez. The system has not yet detected that their mail lists are established. so the default is to general@ -David Marvin wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator > PMC. > It is an initial

Re: Fwd: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])

Dave Fisher wrote: > Hey Folks, > > Etch has graduated and is now a TLP, correct? > > It's board reports should now go directly to board@ from the PMC chair. As explained in the Incubator graduation docs, the Etch project needs to finalise their graduation steps. http://incubator.apache.org/clu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >