+1 [binding] thanks for keeping an eye on projects without progress,
Frederic
Danese
On Mon 18 Mar 2024 at 07:46, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache
> Milagro.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
> [] +1 approve
> [] +0 no opti
+1 to retire (binding)
Danese
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [ ] +/-
+1 (binding)
Danese
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> [ x] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: g
Please VOTE as follows
[x] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator (binding vote)
Danese
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
>
I get these in spates. As James says they don't seem to cause real trouble so I
have learned to ignore them. They only happen between Apache mail server and
Gmail.
D
> On Jul 9, 2016, at 2:45 PM, James Carman wrote:
>
> I have the same issue on a couple of different lists. It never seems to
>
Binding vote
D
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
> [ X ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general
+1 (binding) Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator podling.
D
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua
> into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least
> the next
One nit with this discussion.
It's not true that GPL says it's not okay to make money. If it were then RedHat
couldn't exist.
It is true that the ASF and the FSF have historically been religiously
incompatible on the subject of licensing combinatorics. As I usually explain to
my clients, the w
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list.
>
> http://s.apache.org/LjX
>
> It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the
> discussion took place on th
+1 (binding)
D
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The Corinthia community has voted to retire:
>
> http://s.apache.org/odN
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire Corinthia from the Incubator
What Niall said. +1 and congrats.
Danese
On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a
> good vote email.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Niall
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> Apache CloudStack ent
+1 (binding)
On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would
> like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has
> passed since the initial proposal.
>
> The proposal may be found a
Please cast your votes:
[x ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
[ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation
(binding)
I'll be glad to moderate too.
Danese
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead
> and create the mailing lists.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Sam Ruby
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Mon, June
Sorry, should have said +1 [binding]
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
>
> Danese
>
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
Hi Martin...welcome. Nice to see you post here.
Danese
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Martin Hollmichel <
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> time to introduce myself, I'm Martin Hollmichel, contributor to
> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org since 1994, member of the OpenOffice.org
> C
Help me understand why the project would most benefit from that situation,
Don.
Mentors' main role is to help podling members learn the Apache Way so they
can graduate to TLP. This project enjoys a wealth of excellent mentors and
we happen to mostly be people who have worked successfully together
Jomar,
I had to verify my email address, then log back in to activate the edit token.
Gotta love them wikis ;-p.
D
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:01 PM, "Jomar Silva (Cuca)" wrote:
> Yep... but even logged in I couldn't edit it... I'm from the third
> world, you know :)
>
> Jomar
>
>
And I just heard back from OSCON. We have a room available all day Monday (the
first tutorial day). As mentioned before, access to this meeting would be
gratis.
D
On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> I just heard back from the Open World Forum Programme Committee (Paris,
> Octobe
robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
Not surprisingly, you missed my point (or chose to ignore it). We at Apache
don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that seeing our code in
wide use is more important than money. OpenOffice.org is important to the
Developing World, some of whom will pay for c
Just have to say...I have often been quoted saying the advent of OpenOffice.org
was a rare case of "corporate greed aligning with human need". Safe to assume a
high percentage of downloaders don't have $.99. I know we're all excited by the
commercial potential of an unencumbered codebase, but le
ng the codebase, but I would assume
effectively zero consumer end-users would get their software from us...
D
On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Danese Cooper wrote:
>
>>
>> 4) most customers use OOo on Windows
>>
&g
Some of you know I was closely involved in the original open-sourcing of
StarDivision code as OpenOffice.org. I'm also an Apache Member. Thought some
of the current discussions could benefit from a tiny bit of (no axe to grind)
history.
This information is offered in the spirit of trying to g
>
> As for Ohio, I am already planning on attending,
>
I happen to be keynoting at OLF this year...purely coincidence. Happy to
host a BOF about the Apache Way there if it would help.
Danese
l@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Summit Proposal
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> However, it seems to me that October and November
Eric (and all),
We're only just starting to discuss this...Once we decide on a few venues
for meetings...we'll start wiki pages for signups so people can say whether
they'll be there.
Danese
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, eric b wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 6 juin 11 à 20:21, Greg Stein a écrit :
>
>
Well...we were thinking about adding a track at
http://www.transfersummit.com/BarCamp
which is in Europe...at least.
D
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
>
> > However, it seems to me that October and Novemb
However, it seems to me that October and November are still rather far
off, and with the wealth of conferences over the next two months,
perhaps we could set something up sooner than that? OSCON, anyone?
I've just asked for a room at OSCON, although I'd like to mention that many
of TDF's members a
Actually some of us at ConCom are already deep into discussion about what
meetings would best support better understanding between parties.
As an Apache member, I'm normally quite willing to see email thrash
eventually work itself out...but this news has caused so much concern (and
circular conver
I've just finished speaking to Greg Stein, and I'm also newly time-available to
help. I'd be willing to mentor, and Greg thought I could be of help.
Danese
On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Re "someone from ComDev"... I'm seriously considering whether to sign up or
> not. I a
Mine too. Sorry to be tardy, but since I offered to mentor maybe my
binding +1 was implicit already.
Sent from my phone
On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:06 AM, "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And of course, my +1.
Paul
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Add one "sentimental, non-binding +1" from Danese
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Dave wrote:
Votes so far:
+1 Otis
+1 Niclas
Binding:
+1 Yoav
+1 Henri
+1 Davanum
+1 Brian
+1 Martin
+1 Jim
+1 Alex
+1 Noel
+1 Jean
At what point do we declare victory and start working on the
post-graduation check
Not that I get a vote...but I'd +1 it also.
Danese
On 7/10/06, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems like the discussion on Heraldry has died down, so I'd like
to call for a VOTE on accepting Heraldry into the incubator.
In keeping with Apache practice, I'd like to allow 72 hours or so
Roy and others at Apache,
There are a few OASIS TCs that meet the requirements of Apache and
other FOSS projects with respect to implementability without fear of
royalty burden or patent reprisal. The ability to do stipulate such
provisions was hard-fought at OASIS (first by Sun and later
Been watching this debate and thought I should chime in that Sun has
more than one community where the *source* is under one license (say
LGPL for instance) but the *mail lists* are explicitly under more
liberal terms of use. Why are you all assuming that they mail list
must be under a sou
Leo Simons
Davanum Srinivas
The following Apache Members will be the sponsoring members :
Noel Bergman
Jason Hunter
Ben Laurie
Ted Leung
Geir Magnusson Jr.
Stefano Mazzocchi
Sam Ruby
Leo Simons
Davanum Srinivas
The following community members support this effort :
Danese
37 matches
Mail list logo
