+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Mnemonic
> into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least
> the next 72 hours, with hopes to close it Thursday the 3rd of
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry
> community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate
> Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to graduate the project from the
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> The Quarks proposal has been discussed on the incubator list. The
> discussion thread is at:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3c56c27489.7090...@apache.org%3E
>
>
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
> to the ASF Inc
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below a
Thanks Ted for pointing this out.
The question is "[are you] vouching that all of Sentry's development is
> happening in the open and Sentry development decisions are not being taken
> offlist?"
Yes, to the best of my knowledge, that is the case.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
n my opinion naturally fits the Jira
centric model.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The point I'm making about project dysfunction is something I've learned to
> expect from projects
> that are using inappropriate means to contro
elf how the Jira communication is handled by the project, I think it
may give you information that you may be missing.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015, at 04:59 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM,
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Sun, Dapeng wrote:
> Hi IPMC,
>
>
>
> This is the incubator release of Apache Sentry, version 1.6.0-incubating.
>
>
>
> A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry. We
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, at 07:06 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> > That said, I have personally been in positions where I have seen IPMC
> > members ask - and even demand things at times - that I feel are
> > unreason
y about the state of the podling and what this
does to their way of thinking about Apache and the Incubator.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:18 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
>
s but will be doing so without granting the decision making
privileges to them.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
+1 (binding)
* Verified signatures and checksums
* git tag matches with source distribution
* top level files look good
* sources compile and test correctly
* rat check looks good
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Matt Gilman
wrote:
> Hello
>
> The Apache
+1 (binding, fwded from my vote on dev list)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Shen, Guoquan
wrote:
> Hello IPMC,
> We have passed the PPMC vote for Sentry incubator release 1.5.1(rc0) with
> 3 +1 votes from
> Lenni Kuff, Prasad Mujumdar and Sravya Tiruk
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Hello Apache Incubator
>
> This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation
> of Apache NiFi.
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html
>
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is a
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier:
> http://s.apache.org/kTp
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
> Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is avai
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> = NiFi Proposal =
>
> == Abstract ==
> Ni``Fi is a dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based
> programming.
>
> == Proposal ==
> Ni``Fi supports powerful and sca
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache MetaModel community has wrapped up the VOTE to propose for
> graduation from Apache incubator. The VOTE passed with result:
> 9 binding +1s
> zero 0s
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> >http://s.apache.org/Dk7
> >
> > I would like t
Thanks for taking a look Justin.
Unless there is any issue cited by tomorrow, I will assume that this is
acceptable and move forward.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a scan through the patch and there's no obviou
non-technical tasks that go with it.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:11 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Arvind,
>
> IP clearance is typically by lazy consensus - see [1]. It appears that
> everything is order, assuming you've gone through all the necessary ri
(bumping up the thread for IPMC attention)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Dear IPMC:
>
> Recently Dell Software volunteered the donation of a sizable codebase that
> was built as an extension of Sqoop project. The Sqoop PMC decided in favor
> of
+ 1 (binding)
* Signatures and checksums looks good
* Build OK
* Top-level files look good
* RAT check looks good
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Tuong Tr.
wrote:
> Hello IPMC,
>
> We have passed the PPMC vote for Sentry incubator release 1.4.0-rc0 wi
] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sqoop-quest-data-connector.html
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
PS - Please note that this email is cross-posted to d...@sqoop.apache.org,
so please reply-all to ensure that the Sqoop dev list is in the loop for
this discussion.
+1 (binding, forward from dev vote)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Kasper Sørensen <
kasper.soren...@humaninference.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache MetaModel
> version 4.2.0-incubating.
> T
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Fleece as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incu
The Sentry report is in now. In fact, it was ready yesterday but the PPMC
member writing it did not have edit access. We will remedy that going
forward.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 7:50 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Don't forget, board reports were
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> Based on the results of the discussion thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201405.mbox/%3CCAJg1wMRGhLu4P7LeVQB%2B5K0C-fr-pw2448uj%3D6-3zHag4F1EbA%40mail.
+1 (binding)
* Signatures and checksums look good
* Build successfully
* Rat check looks good
* Top level files look good
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kasper Sørensen <
kasper.soren...@humaninference.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please vote o
+1 (binding)
Signatures and builds look good. Top level files seem OK.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Ramachandran, Karthik <
kramachand...@iqt.org> wrote:
> This is a release of Apache Sentry, version 1.3.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the followin
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Incubator-
>
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https:/
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
> to call a vote for Twill to
[X] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
> seemingly resolved.
>
> I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator
+1 (binding)
Note that I fixed a minor typo in my name on the Wiki.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much
> thought I believe this is the right
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> This message is opening a VOTE to graduate the Apache Curator podling from
> the Apache Incubator as an Apache Top Level Project.
>
> Apache C
+1
* Checked all signatures and hashes
* Tags look good, matched with the source artifacts
* Top level files look good
* All modules build and test successfully
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is the third release
[X] +1 Accept Sentry in the Incubator (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan <
shreepa...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as
> a new project in the Apache I
[X] +1 Accept Spark into the Apache Incubator. (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache I
[X] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache incubator (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
> incubator.
> The vote will close on June 12,
://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose MetaModel for the incubator.
>
> Matt Franklin will be the Champion for this project and the proposal draft
> is avail
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Arvind Prabhakar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Henry and Kasper,
> >
> > I have seen the request for soliciting mentors for MetaModel come up a
> few
> > times on the general list and apologize for not stepping up earlier. Part
>
request. That said, I am
happy to volunteer myself as a mentor if you don't mind bearing the cost of
my learning curve.
It would be great if more experienced mentors out there can find sometime
to help guide this project to successful incorporation within Apache.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
O
[X] +1 Graduate Apache Crunch from Apache Incubator (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> This is a call to graduate the Apache Crunch podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Apache Crunch entered the Incubator in May of 2012. We
[X] +1 Graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> X. Establish the Apache Bigtop Project
> >>
> >>WHEREAS, the Board
[X] +1 Graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator
(binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
> Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first cal
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
> two new committers and made two
The VOTE by Apache Incubator to graduate Flume podling has passed. Tally of
votes is as follows:
16 +1 votes (9 binding, 7 non-binding)
0 +0 votes
0 -1 votes
Binding +1 votes:
Ralph Goers
Tommaso Teofili
Jukka Zitting
Alan D. Cabrera
Patrick Hunt
Arvind Prabhakar
Marvin Humphrey
Jean-Baptise
With 72 hours passed, this VOTE is now closed. I will be sending the RESULT
mail shortly.
Thanks to all who voted and participated in the discussion.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling f
[X] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added n
er/(P)PMC separation is with
> umbrella projects or special cases like GSoC students or co-operation
> across project boundaries.
We took these suggestions and discussed them extensively within
flume-private and reached consensus on promoting the current committers to
PMC on graduation to address Ralph's concern. Had we not reached consensus,
we would not have proceeded with the VOTE. The characterization that the
project is attempting to override a mentor is incorrect at best.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
Flume podling
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of Flume podling from Apache Incubator
This vote will be open for 72 hours. Please find the proposed board
resolution below.
[1] http://s.apache.org/Ckq
[2] http://s.apache.org/DBv
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
X. Establish the Apache Flume Project
/How+to+Contribute
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/How+to+Commit
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Thanks Jukka for your suggestions.
>
> 1. Regarding wiki - I have taken a note of that and will update it soon.
>
&g
during graduation. If we do that, the
diversity concern will be addressed and we can then debate the bylaws once
the PMC is formed.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Arvind Prabhakar
> wrote:
>
Hi Jukka,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Arvind Prabhakar
> wrote:
> > * We have established that there is sufficient diversity in the
> committers
> > list.
>
> I tend to look more at actual co
er.
If at this stage you insist on postponing the graduation, I am inclined to
think that perhaps your own preferences outweigh that of the project and
community. Please don't get me wrong - I am not accusing you of anything,
just requesting you to please consider re
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 2:46 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ralph Goers <
> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Arvin
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >
> > There are four companies represented in this list: AVG Technologies,
> > Cloudera, CyberAgent and Trend Micro. Compared to other projects that
> have
it looks like podling resources need
> to be migrated to the ASF.
These were kept to facilitate the transitoin over to Flume 0.9.5 which
never happened. We instead went straight to 1.0.0. Other than that all
resources have been migrated.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
a)
* Jarek Jarcec Cecho (AVG Technologies)
* Juhani Connolly (CyberAgent)
* Mike Percy (Cloudera)
* Mingjie Lai (Trend Micro)
* Prasad Mujumdar (Cloudera)
* Will McQueen (Cloudera)
* Arvind Prabhakar (Cloudera)
There are four companies represented in this list: AVG Technologies,
Cloudera, CyberAgent an
[X] +1, bring Crunch into Incubator (non-binding)
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We as
)
Arvind Prabhakar (PPMC)
Tom White (IPMC)
Eric Sammer (PPMC)
Alexander Lorenz
Prasad Mujumdar
Matt Hogstrom (IPMC)
Doug Cutting (IPMC)
+0 Votes: None
-1 Votes: None
Thanks to all who voted.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is
+1
Verified checksums, signatures, and source/binary build.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version
> 1.1.0-incubating. We are now voting on release candidate rc1.
>
> *** Please cast your vote within
This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version
1.1.0-incubating. We are now voting on release candidate rc1.
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The list of fixed issues:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGELOG
elease.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> > This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version
>> 1.1.0-incubating.
>> >
>> > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version 1.1.0-incubating.
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The list of fixed issues:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc0/CHANGELOG
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc),
Please disregard this mail due to a typo in the text. Will be sending
out a new vote email shortly.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
>
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.1.0-incubating.
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The list of fixed issues:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc0/CHANGELOG
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc),
) to the trunk, moving the old trunk to
it's own dedicated branch (branch-0.9.5). Since then, the trunk
now contains sources in org.apache.flume namespace and we would
like to do a release from these sources.
Unless you mandate that we prioritize graduation over this
release, we would prefer
resolution proposal
we have voted on for consideration by the board.
Thanks to every one who voted and participated in the discussion.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The vote closed a day or two ago, passing with all +1's. (fyi)
> On Feb
Hi Arun,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> Arvind,
>>
>> (Sorry, I missed this discussion.)
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>>> P
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
&
ve resolution. I also volunteer personally to discuss
and seek Apache-wide consensus on this issue for not only the benefit
of Sqoop, but for other projects who may be in this state inside or
outside of the Incubator.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
&
ainst the
Sqoop community more than anything else. To say that JSR specs are not
the same as old Cloudera code, gives me the impression that some
communities have more power on how Apache implements its policies for
larger communities
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>
>&
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting
wrote:
>>
.
The only reason com.cloudera namespace exists is in order to provide
backward compatibility with third party code.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
>> The source code in Sqoop sti
Echeverria
Jarek Jarcec Cecho
The VOTE thread for this can be found at [1].
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/uxvda2j6mkxleehk
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
The VOTE is now closed. I will be sending a RESULT mail separately.
Thanks to all who voted.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Joey Echeverria wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
&g
as the initial members of the
Apache Sqoop Project:
* Aaron Kimball kimba...@apache.org
* Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org
* Ahmed Radwan ah...@apache.org
* Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org
* Bi
+1 votes:
Jaroslav Cecho (jarcec)
Alex Newman (posix4e)
Paul Zimdars (pzimdars)
Ahmed Radwan (ahmed)
Bilung Lee (blee)
Arvind Prabhakar (arvind)
Contributor +1 votes:
Brock Noland
Joey Echeverria
Kathleen Ting
The VOTE thread for this can be found at [1]
[1] http://markmail.org/thread
The VOTE is now closed. I will be sending a RESULT mail separately.
Thanks to all who voted.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
> have added three new committer
The VOTE is now closed. I will be sending a RESULT mail separately.
Thanks to all who voted.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
> have added three new committer
Here is my vote:
[X] +1 Graduate Sqoop from Incubator
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
> have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
PMC.
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Arvind,
>
> I would encourage removing another ambiguity that I saw
cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Graduate Sqoop from Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Sqoop
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of Sqoop from Incubator
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours from now.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
thread in a few minutes. My sincere apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
> have added three new committers from diverse organizatio
cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Graduate Sqoop from Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Sqoop
[ ] +1 Reject graduation of Sqoop from Incubator
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours from now.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
sure if any of these merit respin of the bits, but wanted to point
these out for discussion.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Updated the content with typo correction.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Oozie community is delighted to share the
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 November 2011 07:40, Bilung Lee wrote:
>> This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
>> 1.4.0-incubating.
>>
>> We got two IPMC votes from our dev list and are looking for a third.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> *** Please cast the v
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Arvind
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end
91 matches
Mail list logo
