+1 non-binding
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Andrei Savu:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Provisionr into the Apache
> Incubator.
>
> The vote will close on March 8.
>
> [] +1 Accept Provisionr into the Apache incubator
> [] +0 Don't care.
> [] -1 Don't accept Provisionr into th
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Tommaso Teofili:
...
> Here's the resolution updated as per Suresh's suggestion.
>
> X. Establish the Apache Clerezza Project
>
>WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Recently there had been a brief discussion on the Apache Stanbol mailing
list about processing DOAP with Stanbol for something.
Suggestions are welcome.
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Shane Curcuru:
> DOAP files are required for all TLPs, per the Branding policy:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mar
+1 non-binding
Andy Seaborne:
> Hi there,
>
> Following the discussion thread, here is the formal vote on the Marmotta
> proposal:
>
> Please cast your votes on whether to accept the Apache Marmotta proposal:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Marmotta into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the accep
+1 (non-binding)
as a first comment.
Cheers,
Andreas
Sebastian Schaffert:
> Dear all,
>
> we would like to propose a new project called Apache Linda as a
> Linked Data Platform implementation to the incubator. Andy Seaborne
> was so kind as to volunteer as a champion for the project. The
> prop
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Stanbol Project:
>
> * Alessandro Adamou
> * Andrea Nuzzolese
> * An
Good catch. The first one obviously was omitted by mistake.
Likely cause of this omission: He was not added to this list when he
became a committer and a PPMC member:
http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/team.html
That Ali Anil Sinaci became a committer was one of the results of the
incubation pro
l members of the
>Apache Stanbol Project:
>
> * Alessandro Adamou
> * Andrea Nuzzolese
> * Andreas Gruber
> * Andreas Kuckartz
> * Benjamin Nagel
>
Rob Weir:
> You probably don't see this on the server yet, but end-user operating
> systems, both desktop and devices, both at OS level as well as in
> browsers and with antivirus software, are shifting over to excluding
> non-signed executable by default. This is equally true of software
> distri
Benson Margulies:
> In the mean time, AOO releases can continue to have 'convenience
> binaries', sans signatures.
If they can have 'convenience binaries' they should also be able to
provide 'convenience signatures".
Cheers,
Andreas
---
+1 non-binding
On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for
> releasing
>
> *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*
>
> The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
> three binding +1 votes from IPMC
+1 non-binding
Cheers,
Andreas
On 10.04.2012 03:32, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't ca
> These touch up changes pretty much complete the proposal and we're
ready to kick off a [VOTE] thread. Thoughts?
+1
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke.
One I do not find funny at all.
> And 2ndly, people could complain that we should
> refuse the donation and force them to
> put all their code/energies into OpenStack...
CloudStack and OpenStack seem to be compl
On 03.04.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Now let's see who complains and says we're fragmenting the
> cloud community or whatever... Where's Simon? :)
Please, as far as I know the community situation regarding CloudStack
seems to be very different from the one concerning LibreOffice and
OpenOff
+1 non-binding
Cheers,
Andreas
On 02.04.2012 11:10, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from
> Apache Incubator to be a top level project.
>
> Jena entered incubation in November 2010. The project has added two
> new committers and PPMC members, mad
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Andreas
On 23.01.2012 16:17, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being
> versioned as 0.7-incubating.
>
> We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3
> binding IPMC +1 votes dur
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Andreas
Am 29.12.2011 17:05, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Hi Incubator PMC members (*),
>
> I've just reviewed the "[PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap..." thread and I
> think all relevant issues have been adressed now.
>
> Let's cast your votes to accept DeviceMap as an incub
Am 13.09.2011 21:38, schrieb Jörn Kottmann:
> The contributor told me that he worked on it also during his day job
and cannot reach
> his VP to sign a software grant and CCLA from him. Therefore he
decided to proceed as an individual
> and he did send an ICLA and SGA to the secretary.
>
> Can we no
Am 19.07.2011 11:10, schrieb Chen Liu:
> Can we continue to release work?
Sure, but *not* within the Apache Incubator.
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
The vote does not need to be suspended. It perhaps would be enough to
leave the vote open for a month. If there is at least one -1 by then the
podling might continue to exist, otherwise it is retired.
My non-binding vote on retirement:
+1
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Am 01.07.2011 23:28, schrieb Upayavir
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
> It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
> being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
> openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
+0 (non-binding)
I would likely have voted +1 if there were no existing Open Source
community behind LibreOffice.
The alleged(!) necessity to remove/replace LGPL libraries not covered by
the Oracle grant will not result in an improved free office suite but
only in delays and further incompatibili
Am 09.06.2011 19:13, schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> Please stop using the meme that software patents make Americans happy.
+ 1 from Germany
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
Am 07.06.2011 19:58, schrieb robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
> and charge $0.99 for the download, the cost of an iPhone app. That is
> over $30 million/year. Heck, I might just do that myself and retire!
No, you can not retire: I will only charge $0.49 or a part of a bitcoin ;-)
Cheers,
Andreas
Am 06.06.2011 09:25, schrieb Greg Stein:
> Hey. Feel free to spin your theories.
Thanks.
> It just isn't possible to divide markets around ALv2 code.
Great if that is so. But if true or not: it is not even an answer to the
question raised by Rob.
I think that you completely misunderstand how th
Am 06.06.2011 08:22, schrieb Greg Stein:
> This is just not a concern. Please end this thread. There is
> no problem, so this is just noise.
I disagree.
The issue is not if there is a legal problem but if people working for
IBM state that it might be one.
That might have a potentially severe eff
Am 06.06.2011 03:56, schrieb robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
> There are limits to what competitors can do to divide markets among
themselves. IANL, of
> course, but this smells very bad, and I suggest we don't broach the topic
> again, unless cleared by ASF Legal Affairs. I myself will withdraw from
> t
Am 06.06.2011 03:08, schrieb robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
> But I am very very very concerned that this conversation is starting to
> cross over into a "division of market" conversation, which has stiff
> penalties under US and international competition law. Open source work,
> like standards, is work
Am 04.06.2011 16:00, schrieb Sam Ruby:
> While other choices may make sense depending on the
> specific circumstances, a necessary consequence of making a choice
> that does not cast the widest possible net is fragmentation.
I do not know if that is a "valid perspective" or not, but I think that
t
Another possible consequence of that option would be that both die.
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Am 04.06.2011 15:10, schrieb Ian Lynch:
> 1. TDF and LO goes its own way completely separate from Apache/OOo.
>
> ...
>
> Possible consequences of Option 1. ApacheOOo gets insufficient
support and
> stagnates
, schrieb Sam Ruby:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Andreas Kuckartz
wrote:
>
>> > If yes: which licenses would IBM be willing to consider ?
> Is there any reason to believe that the Apache License, Version 2.0 is
> not an appropriate choice in this situation?
Am 04.06.20
I am involved in both copyleft and non-copyleft projects and write this
as a member of the Open Source community in the broad sense.
Some people wrote that the only option to make OpenOffice.org /
LibreOffice code legally usable within IBM Lotus Symphony is to use a
non-copyleft license such as AS
Am 02.06.2011 18:09, schrieb Jukka Zitting:
> I wouldn't be too quick to throw away this opportunity to reunite the
related communities.
>
> If the differences truly are insurmountable, I'd like to see that
> explained in the proposal before we vote on it.
+1 (not binding)
Cheers,
Andreas
-
+1 non-binding
Cheers,
Andreas
> Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
> (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
---
+1 (non-binding)
> lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation
> at the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is on the wiki
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal
> and a copy is included below.
-
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal
Out of curiosity: Are there noteworthy relations to these projects?
Apache Stanbol
Apache Jena
Apache Clerezza
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@in
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Am 17.11.2010 14:10, schrieb Ross Gardler:
> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator.
> The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied below.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Jena for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
>
I think that Clerezza and "Foo" can work together in one top-level project.
I have seen that the Jena project also decided "to take Jena into the
incubator":
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4CD0127C.8090105%40epimorphics.com
Maybe the time is ripe for a united Apache Seman
Which widget exactly?
I would not be happy if an inclusion of a widget would enable a company
to track visitors of apache.org.
Cheers,
Andreas
Am 26.10.2010 04:02, schrieb Edward J. Yoon:
> Hello,
>
> We'd like to add twitter widget to apachehama website for display
> recent tweets about #apach
What happened to Socialsite? It was still mentioned in January 2010.
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Dave wrote on August 12, 2009:
> I hope to have another update very soon, I just wrote to my ol' buddy
Jonathan and my favorite Sun VP ;-)
Any news ?
(It would be sad if Oracle and/or Sun prevent this software to survive ...)
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Geronimo successfully left the Incubator a long time ago.
Please visit this page:
http://geronimo.apache.org/
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Ashok Suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:14 AM
Subject: Project
> Respected Sir,
I have forwarded your mail to the Lenya developers list.
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Kuckartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:1
I do not see those changes on the website...
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: Move Apache Lenya to "Successfully Incubated"
>
Apache Lenya is still listed as "Currently Incubating" on this page
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Lenya has successfully exited the incubator. Please move the entry to
"Successfully Incubated" and change the link to http://lenya.apache.org/
Thanks,
Andreas
BTW: there is a small
I am no potential sponsor but would like to see a comparison to Apache Jakarta
Lucene (http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/index.html) which is implemented
in Java.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:04 PM
Su
I noticed that Twister is licensed under the LGPL. Is it possible to merge that
code with Apache Agila ?
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Matthieu Riou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: Proposition: Twister WS-BPEL engine an
This is the current URL (and it exists!) - but there is not much info there at
the moment:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 4:09 AM
Subject: RE: Ap
Sounds interesting. Is a more detailed description availiable somewhere ?
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Apache Agila :
For those who are interested in Derby / Cloudscape:
IBM Donates Cloudscape to Apache Foundation & MS's Patent Purpose
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040803025804265
It seems to be big:
"IBM estimated the value of its contribution to be about $85 million"
Andreas
-
Steven Noels wrote:
> I'm +1 on Lenya exiting incubation, withdrawing earlier reservations in
> the sense that I feel the current community is much more diverse,
> goal-oriented and less marketing-eager than what we have seen in the
> past.
I am still marketing-eager...
(I hope you do not wit
This is my last mail regarding Stephen McConnell. His mails are now
automatically deleted from my inbox. I do not have time for such "debates"
(?)with no visible content.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Jul
Could you please stop lowering the signal-to-noise ratio of this mailing list?
Thanks,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Personal attacks and respect
[...]
> I would cal
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Bad code makes good communities.
For those who are not subscribed to lenya-dev: Not everyone there does agree
with that view (I do not).
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> why is there an "urgent need for release"? And
> why release first, exit later? Why not get
> cleaned up, exit and then have a real release? Personally, I suspect that
> the "ability" to do the aforementioned "releases" has been a factor
> underlying the lack of impetus
Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:04:46PM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
>> vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incubator
>> continue to debate the name of the project.
> Calling this a bikesh
> I'm changing my vote, not because I don't believe in my earlier
> thoughts, but becausewe are wasting so much time and energy on something
> that should be much simpler.
This gets my vote for the most unprincipled vote in this whole thread.
Andreas
--
> > This doesn't work for me at all, I get "It was no possible to
> > get config
> > file"
> > or words to that effect.
> >
> > Ideas?
>
> Do you're using a proxy server?
No, but I am behind a firewall - which should not matter but who knows.
Andreas
---
Me too.
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Kington, Max" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: AW: AW: We want to donate a XML / Cocoon / EJB / WebStart -
based CMS
This doesn't work for me at all, I get "It was no possible to
> Because of ongoing server problems you can test the Application under:
> http://213.252.141.109/admin/
> To get access to the Admin Tool try following:
> User: BT
> Passwd: test
I tried that but when I tried to log in using the Java application I got an
error message saying "null".
Andreas
--
> Any idea what it would take to update bugzilla? Is it just a
> replace-the-script operation, or is it more involved?
Details for the latest released version (2.16.3) are documented here:
http://www.bugzilla.org/docs216/html/upgrading.html
Conflicting Perl library versions are one potential pro
>bugzilla seems to be the one tool that is driving projects to use
>foreign tools [...]
One reason might be that this problem with the installation on nagoya is not
fixed - which could be done by upgrading to a current version of Bugzilla:
query.cgi javascript is as slow as molasses
http:
> They can read the archives via http://incubator.apache.org/mail/general/
> and I think KenCoar has already requested infra team to let it (this
> list) visible via eyebrowse (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/).
How should they know? The announcement said this: "To find out more about
this proj
> Apache Geronimo has been launched within the Apache Incubator.
Interesting. I have not seen a single mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mentioning such a project before. The exception is a mail containing a
proposal sent by Geir Magnusson Jr. which arrived 9 minutes earlier.
Andreas
--
There was no need to send your mail again. Quite a few replies to your first
mail with the same subject and content were posted.
Did you subscribe to the incubator mailing list?!
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Frosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday
FYI.
Other strange things are happening as well such as blocked JBoss cvs
accounts and blocked mails to JBoss mailing lists. This is really becoming
ugly.
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAI
> At the ASF Board meeting on July 16, the Board effectively directed the
> Incubator to accept a proposal to start a J2EE project.
Are the minutes available somewhere?
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
> > I am interested in helping out in any way possible
> Watch this space :)
Are you sure that all these people subscribed to this mailing list?!
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Part of the Apache Way
> is that we admit committers based on their merits. Right now, no one
> outside Cliff's list of commiters has submitted a single patch for
> XMLBeans. I am uncomfortable with *me* having commit rights to xmlbeans
> when I haven't su
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which rules make you so tired? I just blocked the creation of some
> resources for less than a week, and you are already tired? It takes
> years to build good communities, and patience is a virtue. I don't
> honestly think that some days will ruin it
> This is embarrassing. How can we have incubated several projects and
> not have this worked out?
These problems are typical for self-incubating incubators ;-)
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I do not see much sense in moving mailing lists arround. Please
> >> avoid such needless work.
>
> Then incubating would be needless work anyhow, we would make the project
> go live as final right away 8->
I do not hope that the main sense of the
> So incubator folks, what is the correct policy here?
Lenya is also incubated @cocoon.apache.org and not @incubator.apache.org
I do not see much sense in moving mailing lists arround. Please avoid such
needless work.
Cheers,
Andreas
This link to the "Contributor's Agreement (PDF)" does not work:
http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf
"
missing-file
C:\ApacheUPD2\incubator-site\build\site\forms\ASF_Contributor_License_2_form
.pdf
"
Andreas
--
> My main concern is the fact that Lenya does not come only with a
> community, but also with a code base. That code base is in use already
> at a selected number of commercial installations (which is good, of
> course). I hope to be proven wrong, yet I fear the existing codebase is
> intimately li
76 matches
Mail list logo
