Hi Justin
Do you think what's provided in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-684 is accurate/complete ?
I see you mention:
"Any project that doesn't include NOTICE content from bundled Apache
licensed code will likely get a -1 vote. See also
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26
Hi Justin
Thanks for your feedback.
I will do the changes.
I'm very frustrated but I did all these changes before the previous
release, but we got different "confusing" messages during the vote
asking for changes.
Anyway, let's move forward :)
Regards
JB
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 3:21 AM Justin M
Hi Justin
Picocli NOTICE mentions GPL is coming from OpenJDK documentation
copied in the Picocli source distribution (documentation), not
included in jar.
I know that GPL is not allowed, but we don't have GPL dependency here:
- picocli is using Apache license
- picocli jar doesn't include GPL res
It’s documentation file so no it’s only in source, not in the jar.
Le dim. 11 mai 2025 à 02:41, Justin Mclean a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > The NOTICE contains the Picocli NOTICE, mentioning:
> >
> > | This project includes one or more documentation files from OpenJDK,
> > licensed under GPL v2 with Cla
Hi,
> 1. about Iceberg and Nessie NOTICE, during the 0.9.0 vote, you asked
> to remove it explicitly.
I’d suggested that unneeded parts of the NOTICE file be removed, not the entire
contents. See [1]
> Are you now asking to add it (as I did
> initially) ? And Iceberg NOTICE is not required as i
Hi,
> The NOTICE contains the Picocli NOTICE, mentioning:
>
> | This project includes one or more documentation files from OpenJDK,
> licensed under GPL v2 with Classpath Exception.
> |
> | These files are included in the source distributions, not in the
> binary distributions of this project.
>
Hi,
The main thing to do is to establish IP ownership of the code to be donated (in
this case, the modifications to the original). If all significant contributors
sign an ICLA, and they retain ownership of the code, then that should do it.
If some external entity owns the IP to the code, then a
Hi Justin
About picocli, it's actually listed with ALv2
(https://github.com/apache/polaris/blob/apache-polaris-0.10.0-beta-incubating-rc2/quarkus/admin/distribution/LICENSE#L691).
The NOTICE contains the Picocli NOTICE, mentioning:
| This project includes one or more documentation files from Ope
Hi Justin
I'm confused about some points:
1. about Iceberg and Nessie NOTICE, during the 0.9.0 vote, you asked
to remove it explicitly. Are you now asking to add it (as I did
initially) ? And Iceberg NOTICE is not required as it's an ASF
project.
2. Is really ASF header a blocker ? I see the same
Hi folks,
due to a mistake in the admin distribution LICENSE, I cancel this RC
and I will submit/fix a new one.
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of
> Apache Polaris 0.10.0-b
Of the 2 approaches provided, my preference is to use the pypi
directory but that is just my opinion.
On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 03:35, Alexander Sorokoumov
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback, PJ! I will address it in the upcoming release
> candidate.
>
> Regarding, "The file name 'otava-0.6.0+incub
Hi,
-1 (binding) form me.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are file
- LICENSE is missing one file, but give the header issue, other 3rd party files
may not be listed.
- NOTICE is misisng information from Iceberg NOTICE file and Project Nessie
NOTICE file.
- Non-ASF 3rd pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
