[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.7.1

Hi Incubator PMC, The vote to release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.7.1 has passed with 4 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1 votes. Binding votes： - Xuanwo(IMPC) - fanningpj (IPMC) - jmclean (IPMC) - xinwang (IPMC) Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/h51ddcsw0vhpjhsn16p2sml42hc68xqp Thanks fo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

Hi, > Maybe you could label the link just a bit different so people don't think > that it is a download link. It is the download link, as all downloads going via closer.lua links do this and are required by [1]. I’ve added some text to the page to remind people to follow the instructions and v

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

> On Sep 11, 2024, at 19:55, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> Could you please update your downloads page with instructions (or a link to >> instructions) on how to verify the release? > > If you click on the source release, you will get instructions on how to > verify the release. Maybe

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

HI, > Could you please update your downloads page with instructions (or a link to > instructions) on how to verify the release? If you click on the source release, you will get instructions on how to verify the release. Kind Regards, Justin ---

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

Hi Jerry, Could you please update your downloads page with instructions (or a link to instructions) on how to verify the release? Warm regards, Craig > On Sep 11, 2024, at 13:46, Jerry Shao wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The Apache Gravitino (incubating) v0.6.0-incubating has been released!

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

Thanks for your Jerry's hard work. Could you mail this to announce.apache.org, too? If you mail, the Apache official social media will announce the release news of Gravitino, too. Jerry Shao 于2024年9月12日周四 04:46写道： > Hello everyone, > > The Apache Gravitino (incubating) v0.6.0-incubating has been

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

Good point Justin about the importance of checking for problematic licenses. That fat jar is 600Mb and includes the kitchen sink in terms of classes. One set of classes is from OpenJDK JOL and this is GPL-2.0 licensed. https://github.com/openjdk/jol So I withdraw my +1 and switch to: -1 binding -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

Hi, While we have had some previous incubating projects use the WIP DISCLAIMER and not have complete LICENSE and NOTICE information, that was not the original intent. From [1] Blocker - must be fixed and and revoted on: - 3rd party Category X or Category B bundled code licenses not listed in L

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

Yes, I saw that and it's unfortunate. But I still don't think that the IPMC should make this release, acting on behalf of the foundation, given the state of this license documentation. On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:26 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > Unfortunately, the XTable team went ahead and released the

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Gravitino (incubating) 0.6.0

Hello everyone, The Apache Gravitino (incubating) v0.6.0-incubating has been released! Apache Gravitino is a high-performance, geo-distributed, and federated metadata lake. It manages metadata directly in different sources, types, and regions and provides users with unified metadata access for da

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

Unfortunately, the XTable team went ahead and released the jars without having an IPMC vote. I think it is nigh on impossible to get jars removed from Maven Central once they are released. On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:20, rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > > I thought that the purpose of the disclaimer was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

I thought that the purpose of the disclaimer was (at least partially) to flag that the licensing may not be completely correct, but I haven't seen it interpreted as a way to release code before beginning licensing work. Maybe that's okay for a source release where the vast majority of the code was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

XTable is still at the DISCLAIMER-WIP stage and the DISCLAIMER-WIP mentions that they haven't finished work on the licensing. Maybe this could be logged as an issue at https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable and fixed for the next release? On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:06, rdb...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

-1 (binding) I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar has dependencies bundled in, but doesn't have a LICENSE or NOTICE that reflects those dependenci

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

+1 jcamacho (IPMC/PPMC), carried over from XTable dev mailing list [1] Thanks, Jesús [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/klqwmx814bph19fn2ypwsbgorzb776h1 On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:59 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > +1 binding fanningpj (IPMC) > > * file downloads > * sha512 and asc are ok > * incubat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

+1 binding fanningpj (IPMC) * file downloads * sha512 and asc are ok * incubating and apache in name * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP present * Apache license headers in source files * no unexpected binaries * compiles from source - tests take lots of CPU and I had to cancel them but that might b

Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

I removed the release just now. svn rm https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/xtable/0.1.0-incubating/ Committing transaction... Committed revision 71460. Best, Stamatis On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:01 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 9/10/24 14:24, rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > > +1 to m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

+1 zabetak (IPMC/PPMC) carried over from the dev list. Best, Stamatis On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 7:16 AM Vinish Reddy wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > Apache XTable (incubating) has recently published its first incubating > release after a successful vote in the dev list. However, the podling > missed