[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache InLong(incubating) 0.10.0-incubating

Hi all, The Apache InLong(incubating) community is pleased to announce that Apache InLong(incubating) 0.10.0-incubating has been released! Apache InLong is a one-stop data streaming platform that provides automatic, secure, distributed, and efficient data publishing and subscription capabilitie

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.10.0-incubating RC1

Hi Craig, Thanks for your forward description, I know what the comments stand for now. Best Regards, Charles On 2021/09/13 18:40:13, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Charles, > > It appears to me you might misunderstand JB and Justin's comments about the > binary files in the source distribution.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 23:56, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Once podlings report their download page something like this can be > incorporated in clutch3 which will have svn log info from dist. Note that there are quite a few other checks that are needed for a compliant download page, e.g. - no refere

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Once podlings report their download page something like this can be incorporated in clutch3 which will have svn log info from dist. Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > A while back I wrote a script to check podling download links and we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Hi, A while back I wrote a script to check podling download links and we attempted to get them all corrected. you need to manual list all of the download pages. Things it doesn’t do: - check if the latest release is there - check if the contents match with what is in /dist Might be time to run

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

HI, > It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include is > `Apache-2.0 license`, > but the file in ctc_include is `NVIDIA CORPORATION` [2]. > I'm not sure if this will be a problem? That looks like an issue to me. Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Hi, > Thanks for helping us check. We will do a full review of the licenses of > files (and hopefully find ways for automation for them too). Automation may help but it is no replacement for human eyes. > These files are adapted from numpy with significant modification from mxnet > contributor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache InLong(Incubating) 0.10.0-incubating RC1

Hi Charles, It appears to me you might misunderstand JB and Justin's comments about the binary files in the source distribution. They are saying it is a *good thing* that there are no binary (compiled artifacts e.g. .jar, .exe) in the source. Test files like image.png are ok of course. Warm r

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> > >> The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. > >> > >> Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. >> >> Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ >> and for brp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Hi Justin, Thanks for helping us check. We will do a full review of the licenses of files (and hopefully find ways for automation for them too). Since we did specifically look at some of the files that were mentioned to have issues when preparing rc7, I think that we must have been operating un

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Oh yes, the problem is that `3rdparty/ctc_include` should be listed under `BSD-3` section instead of `Apache-2.0` section in the `./LICENSE` file. > On Sep 13, 2021, at 20:28, Xun Liu wrote: > > hi, zhenxu > > It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include is > `Apache-2.0 l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

hi, zhenxu It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include is `Apache-2.0 license`, but the file in ctc_include is `NVIDIA CORPORATION` [2]. I'm not sure if this will be a problem? [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/LICENSE#L221 [2] https://github.com/apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

> I checked the mxnet project again, > and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule > ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers. Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE — Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭) GitHub @kezhenxu94 -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Hi, Panev I checked the mxnet project again, and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers. Best regards, Xun Liu On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:21 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > -1 (binding) as issues brought up from the last RC h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) v1.3.0-incubating RC9

+1 binding. I checked: Here are the checks I did. - Verified checksums and signatures - incubating in the release kits' name. - incubating disclarm files in the kits. - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files looks good for me - Built from source kit without any error Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang W

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kyuubi(Incubating) v1.3.0-incubating RC9

+1 (binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - All links are valid - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers Best regards Xun Liu On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:58 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote: > +1 (binding), carried from dev@kyuub

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 01:58, tan zhongyi wrote: > > Hi，sebb, > > Thanks for helping us to clarify this. > > We will update our website download page to github download page, so others > can visit our website or github repo to download the source tarball. Download pages must use the mirror syst

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Hi sebb and Dave, Thanks a lot for your replies, and I apologize sincerely for our mistakes. I have moved the releases from dist/dev to dist/release just now, https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brpc/ And the download page will also be updated soon. Thanks tan zhongyi 于2021年9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.9.0.rc7

Hi, -1 (binding) as issues brought up from the last RC have not been fixed, namely: - These files incorrectly have an ASF header [1][2][3] - This is not mentioned in LICENSE [4][5]. A quick search shows about 20 files with a Microsoft copyright (some are listed below). I also checked: - incubati