Hi Justin
Thanks for voting. I will fix [4][5][6]. But I still don’t know how to
write a notice file. I have referred to some graduated projects, such as
impala, kudu, airflow, and the notice files in their projects are very
similar to ours. Can you give an example of a notice file?
Justin Mclea
Hi Justin,
I agree, with an updated DISCLAIMER, I guess we can move forward with 0.0.2
release.
However, we have to double check that chardet is not a "direct" dependency (it
seems to come from Airflow, but I didn’t actually check yet).
Regards
JB
> Le 21 avr. 2021 à 00:15, Justin Mclean a é
Hi,
> And on the website, there are also other cloud companies which use the name
> 'Doris' directly. For example:
>
> https://cloud.tencent.com/product/cdwdoris
Which is absolutely no excuse for anther 3rd party to do so. The PPMC need to
be managing its brand (which is why there is a question
Hi Justin,
> - There are still trademark/ branding issues with [1]
We are ready to use apache official docker hub to publish the Doris Dev
Image instead of this website https://hub.docker.com/u/apachedoris.
The email thread :
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd66706e1713db23f16906eab825fadaa3
On the docker hub, I saw the PPMC has already started to solve it.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd66706e1713db23f16906eab825fadaa36d08fa2deda6961483912e0%40%3Cdev.doris.apache.org%3E
And on the website, there are also other cloud companies which use the name
'Doris' directly. For example:
Hi,
-1 (binding) as not all issues from last RC have not been corrected in
particular the NOTICE file
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hash is fine
- LICENSE has been updated and files mentioned in last RC before removed
- NOTICE is still not correct. The notice file is not for li
Hi,
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.14.0-rc05, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/releases/tag/0.14.0-rc05
Doing this is a little problematic, as you are advertising a uni-voted on
release to the general public. Please see [1][2]
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> And that’s my point: chardet is not a direct Liminal dependency, but actually
> an Airflow dependency.
>
> So, I think that’s either Liminal can release "as it is" or Airflow should
> address this dependency.
If you had a WIP-DISCLAIMER and listed this issue in it you could make a
relea
+1 (binding)
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
DISCLAIMER: In place
LICENSE and NOTICE: In place
Rat check: Passed with the .rat-excludes provided
Tried to build doris with docker but failed to build the docker image, when
installing dependencies for building gcc. Will try later.
Thanks.
陈明雨 于202
Hi Matt,
And that’s my point: chardet is not a direct Liminal dependency, but actually
an Airflow dependency.
So, I think that’s either Liminal can release "as it is" or Airflow should
address this dependency.
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 15:46, Matt Sicker a écrit :
>
> LGPL is only allo
Dear IPMC:
Please vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc05 release
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
At 2021-04-19 15:41:21, "寒江雪" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc05 release.
>
>Apache Doris is an MPP-based in
Seems like a good first step if not already done is to reach out to
airflow.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30 Lior Schachter wrote:
> We can't just remove this dependency as it comes from the Airflow package
> deoendencies.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 15:51 JB Onofré wrote:
>
> > Did it change about
LGPL is only allowed in optional dependencies.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 08:31 Lior Schachter wrote:
> We can't just remove this dependency as it comes from the Airflow package
> deoendencies.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 15:51 JB Onofré wrote:
>
> > Did it change about LGPL ? I’m pretty sure LGPL w
We can't just remove this dependency as it comes from the Airflow package
deoendencies.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 15:51 JB Onofré wrote:
> Did it change about LGPL ? I’m pretty sure LGPL was cat B and GPL was cat
> X.
> Maybe it changed (or I’m wrong).
>
> Anyway I would cancel this vote to remove t
Did it change about LGPL ? I’m pretty sure LGPL was cat B and GPL was cat X.
Maybe it changed (or I’m wrong).
Anyway I would cancel this vote to remove this dependency.
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 14:20, Lior Schachter a écrit :
>
> Hi Justin,
> chardet is indeed LGPL (https://pypi.org/
Hi Justin,
chardet is indeed LGPL (https://pypi.org/project/chardet/).
However, from a quick analysis it seems it is installed as Apache Airflow
project dependency.
See below the dependency analysis of this package.
(apache-liminal-002rc1) lior.schachter@liors-mac liminal-getting-started %
pipdep
Aren't both (L)GPL Category X [1]?
Cheers,
Hans
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not
> X).
>
> @Liminal team, do you confirm LGPL license for chardet
Hi
> Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not X).
LGPL is Category X not B. [1]
"Places restrictions on larger works:
• GNU GPL 1, 2, 3
• Special exceptions to the GNU GPL (e.g. GNU Classpath) unless
otherwise permitted elsewhere on this
Good catch. AFAIR chardet is LGPL based (not GPL), and LGPL is Cat B (not X).
@Liminal team, do you confirm LGPL license for chardet (on Pypi) ?
Regards
JB
> Le 20 avr. 2021 à 08:43, Justin Mclean a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry it’s -1 (binding) form me. If issue re the dependancy is clarified I
19 matches
Mail list logo
