On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
>> Ate, could we get a vote on this release?
>>
>
> Sure :-)
>
>
>> If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already making
>> progress
HI,
As noted by others please remove the MD5 hash.
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE year needs updating
- LICENSE is OK
- Files have ASF headers . This file may be missing one. [1]
- No unexpected binary files
- dirndl;t compile
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK and NOTICE good
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
Minor issue is that LICENSE is missing mention of these files [1][2][3] (but
includes their license), b
Hi,
-1 (binding) as the release artefacts don’t include the word “incubating” [1]
and LICENSE and NOTICE require work
Please remove the md5 hashes as they should no longer be included.
I checked:
- incubator rather than incubating is in release artefact names
- signatures and sha512 hashes good
Thank you Willem. Comments inline
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Willem Jiang
wrote:
> my +1.
>
> I checked:
>
> The sign and check sum for both src and binary distributions.
> The License and Notice file for src and binary distributions.
> I can build the binary from source.
>
> Here are some
Hi,
I know the vote is over but I checked the release - the source release is fine
and I would of voted +1 (binding).
Some of the thing that look like they need to be fixed:
- source NOTICE contains wrong year
- binary NOTICE contains wrong year
- binary NOTICE incorrectly list ASF licenses. Th
Hi,
> 3) I dont believe category B (for example the EPL dependencies in
> binary license) dependencies belong in the license (binary or
> otherwise). https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> It is my understanding those would be reflected in the notice.
It’s unlikely that any cat
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source files have ASF headers
- No binary files in release
- Can compile from source
Would be a good idea to sign the release artificers with an apache email
address not an IBM one.
Thanks,
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- Signatures and hashed good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE may have a minor issue (see below)
- source file have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
- fails to compile from source a s I have wrong version of protobuf installed
my +1.
I checked:
The sign and check sum for both src and binary distributions.
The License and Notice file for src and binary distributions.
I can build the binary from source.
Here are some minor issues I found, it's not blocker issues please verify
them and we can fix it in the next release.
I would like to thank Anirudh for his leadership, dedication, patience and
hard work to manage the v1.2 release.
And thanks to all committers and contributors for another big step forward
with MXNet.
Thanks,
Steffen
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:32 AM Anirudh Subramanian
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Th
Hello all,
The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0!
Blog:
https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/announcing-apache-mxnet-1-2-0-d94f56da154b
Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibili
+1 (binding) forwarding my vote from the podling VOTE.
-Jakob
On 25 May 2018 at 09:37, Elek, Marton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Ratis community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Ratis 0.2.0-rc1.
>
> We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote o
Hi All,
The Apache Ratis community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Ratis 0.2.0-rc1.
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release candidate.
Apache Ratis is a highly customizable Raft protocol implementation in Java.
T
Ok, I will include the public KEYS URL in future calls for vote.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:25:24 +0100
sebb wrote:
On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
Hi Willem
You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
Is that
On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
> Hi Willem
> You can find the KEYS file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
> Is that sufficient or do we also need to put the file here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/ ?
Please only
Hi Willem
You can find the KEYS file here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
Is that sufficient or do we also need to put the file
here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/ ?
Thanks,
Jonas
On Fri, 25 May 2018 11:42:28 +0800
Willem Jiang wr
On Fri, 25 May 2018, Moaz Reyad wrote:
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 09:00:47 +0200
From: Moaz Reyad
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: d...@singa.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.2.0 (RC1)
...
The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.ap
Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
SINGA 1.2.0 (incubating).
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201805.mbox/%3CCAH%3DWUUaxPWA8BpcVcFaEt0pd2Nx%3DhqwnQkxpSi1XSyRv-zsgmQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
and the result is at:
19 matches
Mail list logo
