Hi,
Actually my real affiliation would be Sparta Systems, Inc. I believe Craig
would be something along the lines of "Enjoying Retirement" :-)
Steve's affiliation is People Pattern Inc.
John
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:39 PM James Bognar wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
> The affiliations for the initial
Dave,
Thanks. I missed that. In addition, I'm just noticing now that the sign
offs from mentors weren't actually entered by the mentors. I cannot find
any form of approval on list from the mentors.
Milagro podling,
Can you please address Dave's questions? In addition, I have removed the
sign
Hi Raphael,
The affiliations for the initial members are as follows:
John D. Ament, Apache
Steve Blackmon, Apache Streams
James Bognar, Salesforce
Peter Haumer, IBM
David M Goddard, IBM
Raphi D Lee, No affiliation
Craig L Russell, Apache
Stian Soiland-Reyes, Apache
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 P
-0 (binding)
I don't give a -1 here, but I want to know, what the affiliations of the
PMC's are. As I read older reports, i saw that diversity was a topic. I
know, I'm a bit picky about diversity. Can someone provide informations
there. And is the community grow issue really resolved? The P
+1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:12 AM James Bognar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Juneau PPMC held a vote on the readiness for graduation of
> Apache Juneau as a Top Level Project and came to a consensus to proceed
> with graduation. The vote was 7 +1s (5 binding) and no 0s or -1s.
>
> The v
+1 (binding)
thanks!
Venkatesh
> On Oct 8, 2017, at 10:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signature and hashes correct
> - disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - All source files have ASF header
> - No unexpected binary file
+1 ipmc binding
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
> +1 (IPMC binding)
>
> Good job.
>
> Craig
>
> > On Oct 9, 2017, at 7:11 AM, James Bognar wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > The Apache Juneau PPMC held a vote on the readiness for graduation of
> > Apache Juneau as a Top Le
+1 (IPMC binding)
Good job.
Craig
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 7:11 AM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Juneau PPMC held a vote on the readiness for graduation of
> Apache Juneau as a Top Level Project and came to a consensus to proceed
> with graduation. The vote was 7 +1s (5 bi
+1 (IPMC binding)
Well done!
On 9 Oct 2017 3:12 pm, "James Bognar" wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Juneau PPMC held a vote on the readiness for graduation of
Apache Juneau as a Top Level Project and came to a consensus to proceed
with graduation. The vote was 7 +1s (5 binding) and no 0s or -1
Hi everyone,
The Apache Juneau PPMC held a vote on the readiness for graduation of
Apache Juneau as a Top Level Project and came to a consensus to proceed
with graduation. The vote was 7 +1s (5 binding) and no 0s or -1s.
The vote thread can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d8e
Hi John-
I’m reading the report:
>>> We moved all of the crypto code to a new organisation on GitHub called
>>> milagro-crypto ( https://github.com/milagro-crypto ).
>>> It is hoped this will enable further engagement with the community and
>>> specifically their involvement in developing the cry
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 5:00 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> Do you have an example of which code you're referring to? Is it possible
> it just hasn't migrated yet to the ASF?
>
> John
>
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:16 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> Why is
Dave,
Do you have an example of which code you're referring to? Is it possible
it just hasn't migrated yet to the ASF?
John
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:16 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Why is Milagro hosting its crypto code on Github in its own area outside
> the Apache controlled area?
>
> R
Hi -
Why is Milagro hosting its crypto code on Github in its own area outside the
Apache controlled area?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 4:04 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Below is the current draft of the board report. Much of the header info is
> missing,
All,
Below is the current draft of the board report. Much of the header info is
missing, still in flight. We are missing two podling reports and four
reports are presently not signed off on. Podling's on CC please make sure
you've reviewed.
Incubator PMC report for October 2017
The Apache Inc
+1
Checked:
- signatures and hashes
- can build from source
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- rat check
Thanks,
Francis
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:04 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes good
> - disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE and NOT
16 matches
Mail list logo
