The Apache Livy team is proud to announce Apache Livy version
0.4.0-incubating.
This is the first Livy release after entering the Apache Incubator.
Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing
long running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new
applications can be
Pierre is not an IPMC member. Please ask your mentors to vote on the
release.
On Sep 4, 2017 12:31 PM, "Maxime Beauchemin"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The vote for releasing *Apache Airflow 1.8.2-incubating* is now closed.
>
> With a total of *+3 binding* votes, the vote passes:
> * Justin McLean
> *
Hi All,
The vote for releasing *Apache Airflow 1.8.2-incubating* is now closed.
With a total of *+3 binding* votes, the vote passes:
* Justin McLean
* John D. Ament
* Pierre Smits
Thank you to all the reviewers for taking the time to validate this release
and
provide very good feedback. We will
> I'll be honest, I have no idea why they
> think they have to do it, but they do it.
I suspect it is because projects are motivated to graduate and believe
that one or more people on the IPMC with -1 their graduation if they
do not complete the model and put a check mark in every box.
I suspect
Thanks John, I would clarify this on the contributing organization side, and
pass
that along to the mentors. Thanks.
On 9/4/17, 8:13 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
Agreed that the grant in question is missing a proper Exhibit A. But
perhaps their intention with Exhibit A was to list wha
Agreed that the grant in question is missing a proper Exhibit A. But
perhaps their intention with Exhibit A was to list what was excluded,
rather than what was included?
Considering that the committers in question had CLAs on file, I would be
surprised if 3rd Party Code were brought in.
John
On
Hi Bertrand,
I believe they were supposed to provide a list to go along with that zip file.
Can you double check?
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/4/17, 3:30 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
Hi,
I'm mentoring a podling where a large initial code donation just happened.
The corresp
Hi Bertrand,
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:54 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > ...Its unfair for us to put some stake in the ground expecting podlings
> to
> > match up 100% on the questions. Many o
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Jim Apple wrote:
> ...I think the current Model has a number of vague statements that are
> unlikely to be interpreted consistently without clarification. For
> instance "The project is open and honest about the quality of its
> code."..
That's a good example where
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:26 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 9/4/17 4:54 AM:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >> ...Its unfair for us to put some stake in the ground expecting podlings
> to
> >> match up 100% on the questions.
> It's *very* helpful to have podlings consider their growth using some
> form of structured and consistent criteria, so IPMC (and board) can
> consider how different podlings see themselves compared to past podling
> history.
I think the current Model has a number of vague statements that are
unl
+1(non-binding) cool.
From: dongeforever
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 7:39:53 PM
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP
+1
Nice to see the RocketMQ becomes TLP.
2017-09-03 12:38 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean :
> HI,
>
> +1 (b
+1
Nice to see the RocketMQ becomes TLP.
2017-09-03 12:38 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean :
> HI,
>
> +1 (binding). Well done!
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additiona
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote on 9/4/17 4:54 AM:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> ...Its unfair for us to put some stake in the ground expecting podlings to
>> match up 100% on the questions. Many of the questions are subjective - is
>> the code easy to discove
Hi,
I'm mentoring a podling where a large initial code donation just happened.
The corresponding software grant points to a large zip file indicating
that the donation consists of that file's contents, "excluding any
third-party and separately licensed material" that it contains.
My understandin
Hi John,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Its unfair for us to put some stake in the ground expecting podlings to
> match up 100% on the questions. Many of the questions are subjective - is
> the code easy to discover? respond to bug reports in a timely manner?...
Ok,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
> -- SHA-1 : not as bad as MD5, but no longer considered secure
> by some ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1 ; skip
> -- SHA-256 : fine
> -- SHA-512 : fine
>
> So, I would suggest we pick SHA-256...
+1
-Bertrand
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
