Agreed that the grant in question is missing a proper Exhibit A. But perhaps their intention with Exhibit A was to list what was excluded, rather than what was included?
Considering that the committers in question had CLAs on file, I would be surprised if 3rd Party Code were brought in. John On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:06 AM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Bertrand, > > I believe they were supposed to provide a list to go along with that zip > file. > > Can you double check? > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 9/4/17, 3:30 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm mentoring a podling where a large initial code donation just > happened. > > The corresponding software grant points to a large zip file indicating > that the donation consists of that file's contents, "excluding any > third-party and separately licensed material" that it contains. > > My understanding is that this puts the burden on the ASF to review > each and every file found in there, and decide whether we can safely > include it in an ASF release or if it's third-party and separately > licensed. > > Do people agree with that interpretation? > > Have people seen similar cases before, and if yes how were they > handled? > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
