On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> ...There could be issues down the road which means that this option is
> withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were
> later disappointed...
Same here, having one willing podling experiment is fine, but I
wou
There are clearly some issues to work out. These boil down to
a) technical. IPMC doesn't need to vote on that. Greg and Dan and Infra can
vote by doing or not.
b) policy details about who gets which permissions and when. I think that
these can be solved by discussion and consensus and don't even
All,
Below is the current draft of the board report. We still have many
podlings who are missing mentor sign off. Mentors for DataFu, CMDA,
Fineract and Hivemall please review and sign off. Otherwise end of day
tomorrow the reports will be pulled and podlings put on monthly/extended by
1 month.
Incubator PMC,
The vote has passed with 4 “+1” votes from IPMC members and no “0” or “-1”
votes.
+1 (binding):
- Alan Gates
- Colm O hEigeartaigh (voted +1 on Dev thread)
- John D. Ament
- Justin Mclean
+0:
None
-1:
None
I will proceed with official release. Thank you so much for your time
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product
based on an ASF project doesn't mean they have to mention it at
We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/
It only contains the following now :
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>>> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>>
>> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>>
>
> I know when I pointed this out to the PPMC a few
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
> > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>
> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
>
I know when
Hi,
> This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
The new Apache licensed and branded documentation is available for viewing
through the Geode community web site at http://geode.apache.org/
docs/guide/about_geode.html.
--Mark
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if
> the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
>
> A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For
> instance [1] mentions Apache once but h
Hi,
One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if the
PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For instance
[1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or mention of ASF.
The German version
On 11/09/2016 01:00 AM, Christopher wrote:
> Sorry if these questions have already been answered, but I'm still a bit
> confused, so if anybody can answer I'd be grateful.
>
> Why is GA for podlings being considered before GA for TLPs? Or, is GitHub
> already generally available to TLPs, and I mis
On 11/09/2016 12:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>
On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:
Sorry if these questions have already been answered, but I'm still a bit
confused, so if anybody can answer I'd be grateful.
Why is GA for podlings being considered before GA for TLPs? Or, is GitHub
already generally available to TLPs, and I missed that? If I didn't miss
anything, what are the arg
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/20
I am frankly not informed enough to vote up or down. I remain concerned at
the rate we turn out projects that are monocultures but I will trust the
people to whom this decision is delegated.
On Nov 8, 2016 18:51, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> I was looking
I'm +1 to this for OpenWhisk.
I'm -1 to this as a general availability.
There could be issues down the road which means that this option is
withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were
later disappointed.
Niall
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
> >>>
> > I
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
> >
> >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >> >
> >> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is n
And here as well, with the precise specification of at a minimum 3
independent committers:
> The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at
> least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or
> entity that is vital to the success of the project
On 11/08/2016 11:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement"
> in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
> isn't an official IPMC requirement.
It's very prominently displayed in our graduation gui
Cos,
Did you mean this section?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity
> requirement"
> in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and
+1 [binding]
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:58PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on t
On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>
> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>
> Is the P
Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement"
in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it
isn't an official IPMC requirement.
And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has
created a very welcome environment!
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>>> >
>>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concer
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
>> > answered to be able to move forward on this.
>> >
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:59 PM Mark Struberg
wrote:
> Hi John!
>
> Just signed-off the Sirona report and added a small mentor note.
>
> Is it already too late to add this to the summary?
>
I always pull latest from the wiki.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday, 8 November 201
Hi John!
Just signed-off the Sirona report and added a small mentor note.
Is it already too late to add this to the summary?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> On Tuesday, 8 November 2016, 22:36, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well.
>
> John
>
On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>> >
>> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
>> > people affiliated with a single company providi
Ok, the gremlin has been identified - his names "johndament" apparently.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup?action=diff&rev1=326&rev2=327
Apparently this is the "culling process" that removes bad accounts from the
incubator wiki. It had a mind of its own. If anyone else lost ed
It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well.
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports.
>
> Thanks, John!
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:21 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Well that ex
Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports.
Thanks, John!
- Henry
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:21 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added
> you.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
>
Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added
you.
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Are you logged in? If so, what is your username
I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Are you logged in? If so, what is your username? I can double check your
> permissions.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:02 PM Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > Looks like the report page is i
Hi Deron,
Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ (and
i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files -
Are you logged in? If so, what is your username? I can double check your
permissions.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:02 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> John,
>
> Looks like the report page is immutable?
>
> Can't find edit link for it
>
> - Henry
>
> On Saturday, November 5, 2016, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
John,
Looks like the report page is immutable?
Can't find edit link for it
- Henry
On Saturday, November 5, 2016, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Please find below the draft board report for the incubator for this month.
>
> John
>
> Incubator PMC report for November 2016
>
> The Apache Incub
Hello,
Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it be
acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with
their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Luke Han wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov"
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thks
>> Amol
>>
>> On
Hi Justin,
I have added your name to the proposal.
Bruce
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the
> project is willing to have me that is :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
Hi Edward
Absolutely. Thanks for adding yourself.
Regards
Felix
> Am 07.11.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Edward J. Yoon :
>
> Awesome. Let me in.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
>>
>> - restructu
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov"
wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <
>
+1
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <
> niall.pember...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gr
Hi Justin,
It's great to have you join the mentor team.
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like my name be added to be a
48 matches
Mail list logo
