Hi, One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if the PPMC are managing the brand correctly.
A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or mention of ASF. The German version of the page has no mention of Apache [6], and some attribution here would also be nice [7]. But in other places it’s better like the blogs [2][5] (and more) and here [4] telling people where to go for support. Why is the documentation here [3] MIT licensed and copyright Pivotal? I assume this is just out of date and should be removed or redirect / point people to the new documentation? Of course the PPMC may be aware of these issues and working on them. Thanks, Justin 1. https://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire 2. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/news/become-a-founding-contributor-of-project-geode 3. https://github.com/project-geode/docs 4. https://discuss.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/206097347-How-can-I-get-support-for-Geode- 5. https://blog.pivotal.io/big-data-pivotal/case-studies/four-real-world-use-cases-for-an-in-memory-data-grid 6. https://pivotal.io/de/big-data/pivotal-gemfire 7. https://pivotal.io/open-source --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
