This looks very interesting. I'm interested in contributing.
Thanks.
-Gon
---
Byung-Gon Chun
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> unified programmin
I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 07:36 AM, Hao Chen wrote:
Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects,
interested to contribute.
Regards,
Hao
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
Hell
Great: done ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 07:15 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Pls add me to "Additional Interested Contributors" section too. :-)
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofr� [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:39 P
Those are artifacts for unit-testing functionality that needs jar
files as input. Yes, they could be generated as part of the build, but
that wasn't done yet, and frankly that would just complicate the test
suite without practical benefits. Their content is mostly just text
files, with the exceptio
Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects,
interested to contribute.
Regards,
Hao
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> un
Pls add me to "Additional Interested Contributors" section too. :-)
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofr� [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow In
Cool ! I added you on the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:20 AM, ksobkowiak wrote:
It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
in contributing too
Regards
Krzysztof
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/D
Hi Hugo,
I added you on the proposal
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:54 AM, Hugo Louro wrote:
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this project from the beginning.
Looking forward to it.
Best,
Hugo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM,
Awesome: you are in the proposal ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:55 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
Looking forward, also interested in contributing.
On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote:
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this pr
Hi,
great: I added you in the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:24 AM, Prasanth Jayachandran wrote:
Hi Jean
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks
Prasanth Jayachandran
On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote:
It's a great news the project is going to move t
This is great news we look forward to creating a vibrant community with you all.
-Tony
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> Vote passes with:
> [10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre,
> jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor, hadrian
> [ 3] +1 - (non
Alex has it right, and it's important to remember that the ASF never
asks for copyright assignment of code; we only ask for an SGA grant or a
voluntary submission from a contributor of ICLA signer. We only want a
license to be able to ship the eventual Apache project under the Apache
License v2.0.
Vote passes with:
[10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre,
jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor, hadrian
[ 3] +1 - (non-binding)
[ 0] 0 -
[ 0] -1 -
Congrats to the iota community and welcome to the ASF. I will work with
the iota community and our infra to get the proj
Alex Harui wrote on 1/16/16 12:59 AM:
> I would recommend asking this on trademarks@a.o.
Correct, someone associated with the podling please gather all the
information and ask what you need there (which is privately archived).
>
> I would also recommend two separate transactions. IIRC, the SGA
Wow .. great news!
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
-Original Message-
From: Johan Edstrom [mailto:seij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:56 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal
Looking forward, also interested in co
Looking forward, also interested in contributing.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
> to this project from the beginning.
>
> Looking forward to it.
>
> Best,
> Hugo
>
> On Wed,
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this project from the beginning.
Looking forward to it.
Best,
Hugo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Jean
>
> I’d be interested in cont
>
>
> I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the
> brand
> "Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existence of "Google Cloud Dataflow"
> and
> "Apache Dataflow" would conflict with Apache requirements for vendor
> neutrality and project independence.
>
> The issue seems
Hi Jean
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks
Prasanth Jayachandran
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote:
>
> It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
> in contributing too
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in c
It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
in contributing too
Regards
Krzysztof
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48025.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator -
Hi,
I notice the release contains several jars:
./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/templates.jar
./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/config/WEB-INF/lib/WebappLocalFreemarkerServlet.jar
./src/test/resources/freemarker/ext/jsp/webapps/tldDiscovery/WEB-INF/
+1 (binding). Interesting proposal and I love the name.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43
Cool: you are on the proposal
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 09:52 PM, Vaibhav Gumashta wrote:
Hi Jean,
I¹d like to contribute as well.
Thanks,
‹Vaibhav
On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
Hey James,
you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James
Great: you are on the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 09:00 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
Hello
This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman
wrote:
Of course! I'd be happy to help
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 P
+1 (binding).
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Julian
>
> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >> I want to encourage more
Hi Jean,
I¹d like to contribute as well.
Thanks,
‹Vaibhav
On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>Hey James,
>
>you are on the proposal ;)
>
>Thanks !
>Regards
>JB
>
>On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
>> Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:32 AM, James Malone
> wrote:
>
> The Dataflow programming model has been designed with simplicity,
> scalability, and speed as key tenants.
s/tenants/tenets?
david jencks
Hello
This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Of course! I'd be happy to help
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Can I add your to the proposa
Of course! I'd be happy to help
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Can I add your to the proposal ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
> > Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be
> happy
> > to c
+1 (binding)
From: Madhan Neethiraj
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 1:46 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating)
Incubator PMC,
The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved the proposal to rel
good proposal, look forward to participating this project contribution.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48014.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com
You are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 08:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
Nice proposal.
I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with
projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways.
-Taylor
On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM,
Hey James,
you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but no
Nice proposal.
I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with
projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways.
-Taylor
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Great, I add you in the initial committer list then ;)
>
> I q
Hi James,
Can I add your to the proposal ?
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but not pr
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with
> the same version etc., or is this correction enough:
Please keep this VOTE going. It's just a typo, the intent is clear
and there are no real problems.
Marvin Humphre
All of this can be worked during Incubation and I think we have
the right folks here who can help to get it set up.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NAS
This is a bit tricky and I suppose we could leave behind the GPL/LGPL
dependencies that are used for model building when generating releases
under ASF license.
I hope that will work.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Matt Post wrote:
> I imagine so. Model building is very technical and r
Oh no... So what should I do now? Cancel the vote and restart it with
the same version etc., or is this correction enough:
The "+1" voting box was incorrectly labelled. Please vote according to
this:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's
> something that we can address in the "Community" section.
>
This is great proposal. Been working with Apache Flink for a while so love
to help with this project.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> u
As suggested, I added "Additional Interested Contributors" section, and
already added Debo.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a lar
Yes, you are right, we also know that other companies use dataflow
wording (it's the case at Hortonworks for instance).
We gonna start a thread to propose alternative names.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:41 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
This is also a similarly named Spring project:
http://cloud.spr
Great, I add you in the initial committer list then ;)
I quickly discussed with James, we gonna create a section for additional
people as proposed by Sean.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:33 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
Hi JB
Would love to join now.
regards
debo
On 1/20/16, 9:31 A
Good point Marvin, Google Dataflow SDK will "disappear" for Apache
Dataflow, but you are right, the complete Dataflow "brand" will stay at
Google. Let me double check with James and the team.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Bapti
This is also a similarly named Spring project:
http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-dataflow/
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is
> a
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is an
> already known name and "brand".
I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the brand
"Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existenc
> Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
> roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger
> community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with
> adoption?
>
Thank you and fair point. We have a few additional ideas which we c
Hi JB
Would love to join now.
regards
debo
On 1/20/16, 9:31 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>Hi Debo,
>
>Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and
>once we are in the incubation ?
>
>Let me know, I can update the proposal.
>
>Regards
>JB
>
>On 01/20/2016 06:23 PM,
Hi Debo,
Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and
once we are in the incubation ?
Let me know, I can update the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:23 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
+1
Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache
Sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/01/2016 11:18, Henri Yandell wrote:
> 'TM'?
Translation Memory.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWn8SIAAoJEKG7hs8nSMR7h8EP/01XxxF896gbhRJBhlv5ng0J
GxWcFpUYD3yyXp3c1CjmSI5rmLaoDja+ezRwQ/
+1
Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache
Storm and Apache Samza would be great.
I would like to sign up, to help/contribute.
debo
On 1/20/16, 8:55 AM, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
>Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
>roadmap, but I don
Hi Marvin,
you raise a point that we have a bit anticipated ;)
We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is
an already known name and "brand".
The naming is not directly related to dataflow programming: it's more
representative of the data flowing inside a pipeline
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone
wrote:
> == Abstract ==
>
> Dataflow is an open source, unified model and set of language-specific SDKs
> for defining and executing data processing workflows, and also data
> ingestion and integration flows, supporting Enterprise Integration Patterns
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's
something that we can address in the "Community" section.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals th
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger
community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with
adoption?
As a start, I recommend y'all add a section to the proposal on the wiki
page
Hi,
This is a cool idea. Its like Apache TinkerPop
(http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) but for data flow/stream systems as
opposed to graph systems. Our tag line is "the JDBC for graphs." You would be
"the JDBC for streams." :)
You might be interested in looking TinkerPop's Gremlin langua
+1 (binding)
Julian
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this
>> thread went unnoticed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
Hi all,
I second James there, and really excited to be champion on the project
(and work on the codebase as well).
I blogged about a quick dataflow technical introduction:
http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/
Thanks James !
We are looking forward your feedbacks.
Re
Hello everyone,
Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
unified programming model for data processing and integration.
The text of the proposal is included below. Additionally, the proposal is
in draft form on the wiki where we will make any required changes:
http
I imagine so. Model building is very technical and resource intensive and
something only a few people will want or need to do. Working on and running the
decoder (#2) should be the much more common use case, and with the (included,
Apache-licensed) Berkeley LM, that can be done without the need
External is good news. I'm not sure how much leeway there is in the
following quote from [1], but what percentage of your users are currently
using an all-ASF-compatible set of projects?
The question to ask yourself in this situation is:
* "Will the majority of users want to use my
The dependencies can be split into two kinds: ones required for building new
models, and ones needed by the decoder to translate new sentences with a
pre-built model (i.e., black-box translation with the language packs).
1. For building new models, you need a way to align the words between sente
Hey Hen,
Matt Post who I believe is monitoring this list and who has
been one of the key Joshua developers and I have discussed this
and we believe that potentially GPL/LGPL dependencies can:
1. be replaced with category-A or category-B alternatives. Matt
mentioned one already to me which has sli
'TM'?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:42 PM, toki wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20/01/2016 03:38, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > License-wise, any expectation of problems from the GPL and LGPL depend
> encies?
>
> I'd also recommend closely examining the license for any T
[x] -1 Do not release this package as Apache Myriad 0.1.0-incubating
because it is actually Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating
I am +0, however, to releasing it as Apache FreeMarker
2.3.24-rc01-incubating
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Free
66 matches
Mail list logo
