+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree
On Monday, November 30, 2015 9:34 AM, stack wrote:
+1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Nov 24, 2015 1:04 PM, "Henry Robinson" wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for di
+1.A perfect candidate(Metron/OpenSOC) for apache.org.
Thanking you.With RegardsSree
On Monday, November 30, 2015 4:07 PM, P. Taylor Goetz
wrote:
I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm.
I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if it would be welcome.
+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree
On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin
wrote:
+1
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding).
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
>> After in
+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree
On Monday, November 30, 2015 9:33 AM, stack wrote:
+1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Nov 24, 2015 11:33 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance o
Hi David & All,
The 'spark-kernel/torii' is a "good to have" tool.
Pardon me, I am not the judge in any way.After going through this thread and
the referred links, it seems, by giving it a decent publicity in Apache Spark
(may be provide link, etc.),would be sufficient enough for its survival and
They used to have a redirects. But you' re right, looks like not anymore...
So we should ask INFRA to get a 307 resolving the TLP domains.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
>
> http://po
As most of you probably know FOSDEM 2016 (the biggest,
100% free open source developer conference) is right
around the corner:
https://fosdem.org/2016/
We hope to have an ASF booth and we would love to see as
many ASF projects as possible present at various tracks
(AKA Developer rooms):
htt
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list.
>>
>> http://s.apache.org/LjX
>>
>> It would be more clear cut if
+1
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list.
>
> http://s.apache.org/LjX
>
> It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the
> discussion took place on the podling de
Greetings,
The Ripple community has been discussing retirement on their dev list.
http://s.apache.org/LjX
It would be more clear cut if there had been a VOTE thread, but since the
discussion took place on the podling dev list (rather than the private list or
some other non-central channel), si
Greets,
It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
http://podling.incubator.apache.org
http://podling.apache.org
See for example:
http://systemml.apache.org/
http://systemml.incubator.apache.org/
http://mynewt.apache.org/
http://mynewt.incubator.apache.
Thanks Justin. Appreciate your feedback.
> You may want to also double check the version of bootstrap you have
bundled, the comment says 3.2 and that it is Apache licensed, however
> github shows 3.2 is MIT licensed. [1] I think the change from Apache to
MIT happened at around 3.0.3. [2] If this i
Hi,
+1 binding.
I checked:
- release name contains incubating
- signature and hash good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good. May be minor LICENSE issue re bootstrap (see below).
- no unexpected binary files
- all source files have Apache headers
- can compile from source
You might want
Marvin I would love to accept your help in retiring the podling. I'll close out
the trademark issue with the community in parallel.
Thank you
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 5:30 PM
To: general@incubator.apach
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Looks like there is consensus here. I'm not sure of the process as I've
> never been through it before so copying general@incubator for guidance.
>
> General@ the Ripple Podling has consensus on retiring itself from the Apache
> Incubator - w
Sorry for the late reply.
FYI there is an opensource project called torii already:
https://vestorly.github.io/torii/
Whether there is a trademark or not, I'd recommend a name that does not
collide with another project.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Thanks for all your
I'm interested as well, particularly given the ties to Storm.
I'd be happy to volunteer as mentor and/or committer if it would be welcome. I
have some familiarity with both projects (obviously one more so than the other
;) ).
-Taylor
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, larry mccay wrote:
>
> This
Actually adding general@ for guidance on the process
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM
To: d...@ripple.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Ripple to be retired from the incubator?
Looks like there is consensus
+1
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding).
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
>> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on
>> the acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at t
+1 (binding)
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding).
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>
>> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on
>> the acceptance of Torii Project for incub
+1 from me.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
+1 (binding)
- Sam Ruby
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the
> acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The
> full proposal is
> available at the end of this message and on
This is an interesting proposal that seems would build a community where an
open one doesn't really exist at the moment.
A project like this needs a healthy community to survive and scale with the
pace of changes in attacks.
I for one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or
commit
And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding).
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on
> the acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is
> available at the end of thi
+1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Nov 24, 2015 1:04 PM, "Henry Robinson" wrote:
> Hi -
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been
> sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala
> to the ASF Incubator.
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on that propo
+1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Nov 24, 2015 11:33 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://wiki
Hi all,
We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron as an incubator
podling. The proposal is on the wiki here:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal
I would call your attention to the background section in particular. The
condensed version is that the original code base
Hi,
I was interested in being an incubator Shepard, let me know if there is
anything I can do in this area.
Best,
Zach
--
Zach Jaffee
B.S. Computer Science
Case Western Reserve University Class of 2017
Operations Director | WRUW FM 91.1 Cleveland
Secretary | Recruitment Chair | Phi Kappa Theta
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >b) are you just re-inventing the ICLA?
>
> In my mind, the ICLA represents your formal pledge to be part of an ASF
> community and continue to contribute. It has to be recorded by the
> secretary and reads like legal-ese I am trying for a h
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> In these cases, we are not creating a new PMC around these code bases, we
> are placing it under control of an existing PMC.
Which, in effect, creates a new PMC around those code bases :)
> Plus, there is
> effectively no com
OK, next draft below. Some comments first:
On 11/29/15, 6:25 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>Here are a couple of comments, mostly kind of independent:
>
>a) this is a good start. Very sound directionally.
>
>b) are you just re-inventing the ICLA?
In my mind, the ICLA represents your formal
31 matches
Mail list logo
