On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Luke Han wrote:
> Just got SGA confirmation from ASF as below...
Confirmed, +1 for graduation then.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional co
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?..
4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting
was yesterday and the next one is on November 18.
As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that nobody caught that, we no
Your reply is fine, except that your original question was about what happens
when “If it turns out that the Mentors have been reminding the podling to file
but nobody's followed through”
In other words mentors have already said “I’m on it” and have already tried to
fix the problem. Your reply
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that Owen O'Malley has not had enough time to be a viable
> > mentor recently and should not be on the list of mentors.
> >
>
> I have been helping Kylin out and i
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I would suggest that Owen O'Malley has not had enough time to be a viable
> mentor recently and should not be on the list of mentors.
>
I have been helping Kylin out and it is graduating, so I'm down to just
Hawq. I'd like to help Eagle out.
Update: the mailing lists have been created, in case anybody is interested
in following along.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Sterling Hughes
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Sterling Hughes
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As mentioned in the DISCUSS thread, all feedback has been posi
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> Just got SGA confirmation from ASF as below.
>
> Please help to double check and change your vote if necessary.
>
> Will update project status and send out vote result later.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -
>
> *This message acknowled
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Apologies for potentially coming out of left field on this…
>
hehe... I did too :-)
> But I think that IP clearance is currently a difficult road to travel, and
> I worry that we are graduating podlings that don’t even know when or how
Apologies for potentially coming out of left field on this…
But I think that IP clearance is currently a difficult road to travel, and I
worry that we are graduating podlings that don’t even know when or how to go
down that road. It’s all too easy to merge a github pull request without
consider
Thanks Jason to check these.We should add in notice/disclaim files about
this(AdminLTE already be mentioned there)
But this should not a block issue for release.
Hi Justin, would you mind to check and vote again?
Thank you very much.
Regards!
Luke Han
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:29 PM -0700, "J
Hi all,
about the font license
Kylin UI is build with AdminLTE[1]
AdminLTE license here[2]
AdminLTE use google webfonts, you can see it at first line here[3]
due to firewall issue,some places like CHINA may not be able to access
this file.so we download it to local file
"webapp/app/fonts/A
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> approval. If you wait 4 weeks you don't graduate until December.
The Incubator isn't going to vote again. The text of the graduation
resolution from an Incubator
On Oct 21, 2015 22:48, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
> match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer
to
> "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
> paragraph from the template
Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to
"podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
paragraph from the template, releasing the Incubator from responsibility.
See th
Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?
On Oct 21, 2015 21:09, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
> The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled
> due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the
> community.
>
> The reason was an editorial
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:45 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:40 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > I believe a PMC is capable of performing IP clearance itself. They have a
> > VP that is an Officer and can take responsibility for the Foundation in
> > matters of that Project. The f
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:40 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> I believe a PMC is capable of performing IP clearance itself. They have a
> VP that is an Officer and can take responsibility for the Foundation in
> matters of that Project. The forms/recording are valid, so I haven't
> suggested changing that
Just got SGA confirmation from ASF as below.
Please help to double check and change your vote if necessary.
Will update project status and send out vote result later.
Thanks.
-
*This message acknowledges receipt of the following document, which has
been filed in the Apache Software
I believe a PMC is capable of performing IP clearance itself. They have a
VP that is an Officer and can take responsibility for the Foundation in
matters of that Project. The forms/recording are valid, so I haven't
suggested changing that (tho I'd like to see them move under /legal/, I'm
not fussed
Greg,
If I'm reading your email correctly, you're just saying that the Incubator
is not responsible for processing IP Clearances in a lazy way. Projects
should instead direct their IP clearance emails to <>.
That <> is TBD.
John
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:17 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> [trimmed re
[trimmed response right now; in favor of getting a couple other voices]
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>...
> What is this, randomly propose changes to the incubator month?
>
Has nothing to do with the Incubator, but with how a PMC records its IP
clearance. And more importantl
The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was
tabled due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code
or the community.
The reason was an editorial error on my side, I used the wrong template
and the last paragraph releasing the incubator from its responsib
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks
Naresh
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Cai, Eddy wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chun, Chad [mailto:wac...@ebay.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:17 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Ap
+1
-Original Message-
From: Chun, Chad [mailto:wac...@ebay.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:17 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator
+1
Chad Chun
wp_c...@hotmail.com
On 10/16/15, 4:22 PM, "蒋旭" wrote:
>+1
>Jiang
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> This is one aspect that I feel needs fixing. Currently there are too many
> people who "might" be responsible. What we need is someone who *is*
> responsible. It's initially the mentors, but if (as per your original
> question) a podling has f
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > On the following page:
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>> >
>> > The pr
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > On the following page:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> >
> > The process steps do not align with the intent described in the Prea
Hi,
It’s +0 (binding) from me.
I checked:
- release name includes incubating
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK, but probably missing font license
- NOTICE all good
- All source files have apache headers (a few test files and data files don’t)
- A couple of unexpe
+1 (binding)
Checked sigs license headers, NOTICE, LICENSE, etc. All look good.
-Taylor
> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:42 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating.
>
> Proposal:http://s.apache
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On the following page:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>
> The process steps do not align with the intent described in the Preamble,
> and some steps are not required. Specifically, steps 5, 7
Hey all,
On the following page:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
The process steps do not align with the intent described in the Preamble,
and some steps are not required. Specifically, steps 5, 7, and 8.
Step 5: the code will be imported *somewhere*; there i
I think the concern was just kind of a spill-over from other
discussions about rebooting the Incubator so new proposal kind of
being scrutinized more.
Which is OK for me, that is why we have DISCUSS thread right now :)
To just follow up, the concerns that have been raised, the Eagle team
is happy
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
>...
> To be fair, I will circle one more time to existing mentors for Eagle
> to confirm their commitment for active participation in the podling.
> Would that be acceptable solution?
>
Acceptable to whom? I bet you there are enough people
HI Marvin,
You are preaching to the choir with me =)
Totally agree with your comment.
The Eagle team have met with proposed mentors before and have
presented and ask for availability and willingness to help mentor the
project and we got positive response from them.
Now, if the question is whether
Hi Sid,
Thanks for your support.
Actually we have developed an Ambari plugin for Eagle where someone could
use Ambari to deploy Eagle. We have this working on the sandbox. Would
like to have you as a contributor. I will reach out to you.
Thanks,
Arun
On 10/21/15, 9:22 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" wro
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Thanks for your concern, but we have had discussions with all proposed
> mentors before to ask for their availability and willingness to
> actively mentor this project.
>
> I think we are good with existing proposed mentors.
Henr
Hi Arun,
This proposal looks great. I would like to be an active contributor on this
project. I bring with me the experience of Apache Ambari and developing the
Ambari Metrics System.
Best Regards,
Sid
From: Julian Hyde
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015
My name is already on the list of mentors. I think this project fills an
important need. Several of the initial committers were involved with Kylin and
therefore know the Apache process.
Julian
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 11:58 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> I should also have some improved bandw
Thanks Don. Looking forward to work with the Ranger team for meaningful
integrations.
On 10/20/15, 10:19 PM, "Don Bosco Durai" wrote:
>Hi Arun
>
>This looks really good and fills some obvious gaps in the security
>landscape.
>
>Happy to contribute anyway you want.
>
>All the best!!!
>
>Bosco
>
>
Hi IPMC,
We would like to have more vote from IPMC members to help on this
release candidate.
Thank you very much.
Luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Signature file look good
> Hash files look good
> LICENSE a
Thanks Bertrand to kindly remind this:)
I should use send out "vote result" instead of "announce".
Thanks.
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> > ...I think it's ok to a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> ...I think it's ok to announce graduation once ASF confirmed this SGA...
The next step is not announcing graduation, it's sending the
graduation request to the ASF Board for approval.
-Bertrand
--
SGA has confirmed and sent to secretary already.
kylin.xml also updated with correct date.
I think it's ok to announce graduation once ASF confirmed this SGA.
Thanks.
I do see one error, possibly not a big deal. Romain added the BatchEE
podling's report on 10/13, but never updated the other sections to reflect
that the podling did report. Perhaps this was intentional.
FWIW, Romain is not listed as a mentor at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/batchee.html
+1 (Non Binding)
Hao Chen
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Chun, Chad wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Chad Chun
> wp_c...@hotmail.com
>
>> On 10/16/15, 4:22 PM, "½¯Ðñ" wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> Jiang Xu
>> -- ÔʼÓʼþ --
>> ·¢¼þÈË: "Henry Saputra";;
>> ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2015Äê10ÔÂ16ÈÕ(ÐÇÆÚ
+1 (Non Binding)
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Chun, Chad wrote:
> +1
>
> Chad Chun
> wp_c...@hotmail.com
>
> On 10/16/15, 4:22 PM, "蒋旭" wrote:
>
> >+1
> >Jiang Xu
> >-- 原始邮件 --
> >发件人: "Henry Saputra";;
> >发送时间: 2015年10月16日(星期五) 上午9:16
> >收件人: "general@incuba
+1
Chad Chun
wp_c...@hotmail.com
On 10/16/15, 4:22 PM, "蒋旭" wrote:
>+1
>Jiang Xu
>-- 原始邮件 --
>发件人: "Henry Saputra";;
>发送时间: 2015年10月16日(星期五) 上午9:16
>收件人: "general@incubator.apache.org";
>
>主题: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator
>
>
>
>+1 (
47 matches
Mail list logo
