I think the concern was just kind of a spill-over from other discussions about rebooting the Incubator so new proposal kind of being scrutinized more. Which is OK for me, that is why we have DISCUSS thread right now :)
To just follow up, the concerns that have been raised, the Eagle team is happy with existing mentors and would like to move forward with them. I have strong faith in my fellow IPMCs as mentors for this project to help the project go through the incubation process. - Henry On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>... > >> To be fair, I will circle one more time to existing mentors for Eagle >> to confirm their commitment for active participation in the podling. >> Would that be acceptable solution? >> > > Acceptable to whom? I bet you there are enough people who find the list of > mentors to be acceptable, despite Marvin's emails otherwise... :-) > > To put it another way: it is unfair to pre-judge people. Even more, > *accepting* a podling should not be subject to a preapproved list of > mentors, since we have juggled mentors many times in the past. *Should* a > mentor be absent in the *future*, then they can be replaced. ... but I > believe it is better to be reactive, than to pre-judge. > > Cheers, > -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
