On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Please give me write access on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/!
> Name: DanielDekany
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
Please give me write access on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/!
Name: DanielDekany
(I'm an initial comitter at FreeMarker:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> I want to create a wiki page for a proposal to incubate Apex with ASF. Can
> someone give me edit access for the following page?
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
>
> For those unfamiliar with Apex; it is an unified batch and str
I want to create a wiki page for a proposal to incubate Apex with ASF. Can
someone give me edit access for the following page?
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal
For those unfamiliar with Apex; it is an unified batch and stream
processing compute platform native to Yarn that was open s
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:36AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> > wrote:
> >> ...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
> >> PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board mak
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >
>
> In fact, in my opinion it leads to the very unfortunate side effect of IPMC
> >
> feeling in need to justify why it exists by micromanaging podlings.
>
> I've been through incubation as a mentor on Phoenix, Nifi, and now getting
>
+1
I haven't experienced micromanagement as a mentor. Quite the opposite.
If it all comes down the mentors and with the AWOL rate the mentoring
can become a very few opinions. I think tegher is an implicit
assumption of experienced mentors here.
If more is pushed down to the mentors, I've
>
In fact, in my opinion it leads to the very unfortunate side effect of IPMC
>
feeling in need to justify why it exists by micromanaging podlings.
I've been through incubation as a mentor on Phoenix, Nifi, and now getting
up to speed on Trafodion, I have not seen micromanagement of podlings.
On 03.08.2015 21:51, Julian Hyde wrote:
> In my experience incubating Calcite, the “overhead” was mostly the
> infrastructure and process, not politics. (If you think the incubator is
> political, you haven’t seen politics…) The process is necessary (mostly) to
> ensure clean IP. The infrastruct
On 03.08.2015 18:36, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> It's not the central Incubator folks like our regular release
> reviewers and report contributors who invent these extra criteria
Sorry but this has to be said: I see folks on this list inventing policy
(or rather, confusing opinion and policy) all the
On 2015-08-03 21:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Yup. I believe this to be an unfortunate (at least from my standpoint)
but and extremely fair observation.
As far as I'm concerned the issue of R&Rs of IPMC is in a state of a
stalemate right now. We clearly have a "everything's fine lets just
add m
In my experience incubating Calcite, the “overhead” was mostly the
infrastructure and process, not politics. (If you think the incubator is
political, you haven’t seen politics…) The process is necessary (mostly) to
ensure clean IP. The infrastructure, less so. So, if we’re talking about how to
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point with
> regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
> distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a release
> itself,
" This is that proverbial "political overhead" that a lot of folks are accusing
ASF of and cite as a reason of not going into the foundation. Which is grossly
unfair at the board level, but unfortunately seems to be very true at IPMC
level today."
+1000
-Original Message-
From: shaposh
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
>> it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
>> a week ago: what would be the effective way to change
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> ...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
>> PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
>
> How is that different from the status quo where a podli
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:18 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I wonder how much of the silence is a notion of "I don't want to be
> accountable if something goes wrong in this podling."
Right, but that same concern could be applied to every single TLP
and yet the board seems to do the right thing with t
+1
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 09:37
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reform of Incubator {was; [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the
Apache Incubator)
[ ... ]
It's not the central Incubator folks l
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
>> wrote:
>> > ...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
>> > PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> > ...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
> > PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
>
> How is that different from the status quo where a
OK, I’ll bite. Do you have links to where you got this information?
-Alex
On 8/3/15, 2:55 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point
>with regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
>distribution of a
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 August 2015, 10:30 am PST. The
report
for your podling will
Congratulations on achieving this milestone and good luck for many more to
achieve in near future!
Best,
Dhaval
"Sent from my iPhone, plaese excuse any typos :)"
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 1:29 AM, Rajat Gupta wrote:
>
> congrats guys
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Luke Han wrote:
>> Co
Congratulation!!
+1
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:38 AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Zeppelin team is proud to annouce the first release of Zeppelin
> inside the Apache incubator: 0.5.0-incubating.
>
> Apache Zeppelin is a web-based notebook that enables interactive data
> analytics wit
congrats guys
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Luke Han wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:43 AM, 김영우 wrote:
>
>> Congratulations!
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:08 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The Apache Zeppelin team is proud to annouce the first rele
Good job!!
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Nihal Bhagchandani <
nihal_bhagchand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> that is a great news guys
>
> thumbs up to the whole team...
>
> Nihal
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:42 AM, IT CTO wrote:
>
>
> Well done! Great team effort and great leadership by
Well done! Great team effort and great leadership by Moon.
0.6 here we come!
Eran
בתאריך שבת, 1 באוג׳ 2015, 09:08 מאת moon soo Lee :
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Zeppelin team is proud to annouce the first release of Zeppelin
> inside the Apache incubator: 0.5.0-incubating.
>
> Apache Zeppelin is a web-b
that is a great news guys
thumbs up to the whole team...
Nihal
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:42 AM, IT CTO wrote:
Well done! Great team effort and great leadership by Moon.
0.6 here we come!
Eran
בתאריך שבת, 1 באוג׳ 2015, 09:08 מאת moon soo Lee :
Hi,
The Apache Zeppelin team is
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
> it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
> a week ago: what would be the effective way to change the
> status quo around IPMC an make it more board like?
>
Hi all,
some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point
with regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a release
itself, and that there should be no download source of it outside of
ap
On 2015-08-03 09:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that different from the status quo where a podling with active
ment
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
> PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How is that different from the status quo where a podling with active
mentors can have their releases +1ed by their mentors
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
> > Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki
> ContributorGroup.
>
> Done.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
>
Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki ContributorGroup.
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For ad
Hi,
Requesting adding of username AtriSharma to Incubator wiki ContributorGroup.
--
Regards,
Atri
*l'apprenant*
35 matches
Mail list logo
