Thanks for the helpful pointers and a good starting point, Justin and
Amareshwari.
— Hitesh
On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> - jetty-6.1.x-jar and jetty-utils-6.1.jar - jetty is Apache License v2 but
>> has some bits in the Notice file (
>> http://svn.codehaus.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> To recap: while Ted has the privilege of editing the narrative as IPMC
> Chair, the Incubator is a big place and the top section is at its best
> when it is a collaborative, community effort. Please feel free to add
> a bullet point or two
On 4/22/15, 3:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> "Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing”
>
>By fix did they mean remove them all or add missing trademarks? What
>exactly was the advice they gave?
Like I said upthread "If I missed listing a trademark, I’ll ad
Hi,
> - jetty-6.1.x-jar and jetty-utils-6.1.jar - jetty is Apache License v2 but
> has some bits in the Notice file (
> http://svn.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty/branches/jetty-6.1/NOTICE.txt ) that I
> would like to understand whether I should call out in either the License
> and/or Notice files
Hello Hitesh,
In Apache Lens, we went through the phase of jersey dual license. You can
look at the discussion in legal
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201501.mbox/%3CCAAS6%3D7jJoJMkzMRpSdJ6kAVSZCvSfC5aRD0eMyGzP_rzWyE73Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E
and documentation here -
https
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks again to everyone who has contributed towards another strong report
>>> from the Incubator this month -- I'm co
The same person was involved by saying "did that, here's what to do to avoid
it".
That is, he was part of the solution this time. Exemplary performance I would
say.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 2:47, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> Ok, that's true, but the same person has been invol
Hi,
> "Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing”
By fix did they mean remove them all or add missing trademarks? What exactly
was the advice they gave?
Given the discussion took place off list and the Flex PMC was not involved in
this donation I have no way of knowi
That's a huge logic leap Andrew. And I appreciate you don't share such
illogical conclusions with everyone, unless you're 100% sure in their accuracy.
Regards,
Cos
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so
> i
On 4/22/15, 2:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> If I missed listing a trademark, I’ll add it in
>
>I think this has come up before (original Flex SDK donation?). From
>memory Adobe is (overly) protective of their (non donatated) trademarks
>wanted to make sure that they don't become dilut
HI,
> If I missed listing a trademark, I’ll add it in
I think this has come up before (original Flex SDK donation?). From memory
Adobe is (overly) protective of their (non donatated) trademarks wanted to make
sure that they don't become diluted by association with open source so would
prefer n
Hi folks
Could someone point to a project’s ( or multiple projects ) License/Notice
files where the project bundles the following as part of its binary
distribution:
- jetty-6.1.x-jar and jetty-utils-6.1.jar - jetty is Apache License v2 but
has some bits in the Notice file (
http://svn.c
+1
The original CCLA / SGA agreement mentioned the wrong GitHub repo, one that
did not include all of the Usergrid code. This new SGA lists the correct
repo and the same one that was imported into Apache's Git.
Thanks for getting this cleared up, John.
- Dave
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM,
This is the second incubator release for Apache Streams, with the
artifacts being versioned as 0.2-incubating.
All blocking issues raised during IPMC voting for rc2 have been addressed.
Specifically, we've removed all test data of indeterminate license, or
containing any potentially personally id
On 4/22/15, 6:38 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I guess I don’t understand. For review, the language is variations of:
>>
>> "Adobe and Adobe Flash are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
>> Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and/or other countries
>>and
>> are us
+1 and thank you for using DRAT on the code base Lewis!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailsto
Hi John,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:20 AM,
wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Upon entering the incubator, the Apache Usergrid podling filed a CCLA for
> contributors. Within that CCLA was a noted grant about the software behind
> Usergrid. Upon closer inspection, it was deemed that there was in fact a
> miss
Hello,
Thanks for voting Justin. Appreciate it.
> - I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named
> gremlin rather than tinkerpop
TinkerPop is the project as a whole. Within TinkerPop, there are various
components.
gremlin-core
gremlin-groovy
had
Hi,
> I guess I don’t understand. For review, the language is variations of:
>
> "Adobe and Adobe Flash are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
> Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and/or other countries and
> are used by permission from Adobe. No other license to the Adob
+1
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 20, 2015, at 1:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>https://wiki.apache.org/in
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE ok
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary files
- Still can’t compile from source but it tells me I have wrong java version
- most of the issues
Hi,
> I don’t think those words would be removed. No other license/permission has
> been granted.
Then can you please explain how we can accept the donation if we don’t have
legal permission to use trademarks it contains.
Thanks,
Justin
Regardless, this is the wrong venue for such discussions. I apologize and
will bring my concerns up at the right list.
A.
On Apr 22, 2015 08:47, "Andrew Bayer" wrote:
> Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so
> it's not a big logical leap.
>
> A.
>
> On Wednesday
On 4/22/15, 12:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>(resending from correct email address - sorry if this shows up twice)
>
>> I don’t think those words would be removed. No other
>>license/permission has been granted.
>
>Can you please explain how we can accept the donation if we don’t have
Hi,
(resending from correct email address - sorry if this shows up twice)
> I don’t think those words would be removed. No other license/permission has
> been granted.
Can you please explain how we can accept the donation if we don’t have legal
permission to use trademarks it contains.
Than
26 matches
Mail list logo
