-- with reply below --
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 13:39
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I am
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I am puzzled by the TinkerPop proposal identifying 3 initial committers and
> yet there is this long list of affiliated folks.
>
> What is that separate list intended to signify if none of them are worthy to
> be initial committers?
If
I am puzzled by the TinkerPop proposal identifying 3 initial committers and yet
there is this long list of affiliated folks.
What is that separate list intended to signify if none of them are worthy to be
initial committers?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.d
Sure. You need three minimum. But you need three minimum active people at
nearly *any* given time.
With only three to choose from that can be really hard.
>From my experience with changing priorities and such, having 10 or more is
much more practical.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Marko R
