Sure. You need three minimum. But you need three minimum active people at nearly *any* given time.
With only three to choose from that can be really hard. >From my experience with changing priorities and such, having 10 or more is much more practical. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I had "read somewhere" that you needed 3 people at minimum for the PPMC. I > ran the names (Marko,Stephen,James) by our TinkerPop-Contributors list and > there was no pushback. > > Moving forward, if someone does provide sustained, beneficial work to > TinkerPop, they are more than welcome to get involved to the depths they > feel necessary. This is always a desire --- to find people who will spend > days in and days out (for years in and years out) dedicated to providing > their time and patience to TinkerPop. Thus, typically finding those people > is the difficult part, not the accepting of those who do so. > > Thank you for your thoughts, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > On Dec 24, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> AA. Initial Committers > >> > >> We would like to keep the voting rights to 3 individuals: Marko A. > >> Rodriguez (Aurelius), Stephen Mallette (Nidomics), and James Thornton > >> (Electric Speed). > >> > > > > This is a problem for other reasons as well. Many actions require 3 > > positive votes. This means that if anybody is MIA, the project is dead > in > > the water with no ability to make releases or even to add somebody to the > > PPMC to get back to having 3 voters. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
