Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

2014-12-03 Thread jan i
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014, Jake Farrell wrote: > +0 > > concerns being: > - would this project be better suited as a part an existing ASF project, > AOO or ODF Toolkit AOO developers suggested to start a new project, without the history. See also comments in this thread from pescetti (chair

Re: [VOTE] Release Samza version 0.8-incubating

2014-12-03 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 (binding) Verified signature and checksum, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE look good (specifically, checked licensing for deps: jquery, bootstrap, glyphicons, and fontawesome). Minor nits: - the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level (referenced in docs; not sure whether

[REMINDER] Podling reports due by end of day

2014-12-03 Thread John D. Ament
Podlings, Don't forget that all reports are due by end of day today. There are many reports still missing. John

Re: [VOTE] accept corinthia into incubator

2014-12-03 Thread Jake Farrell
+0 concerns being: - would this project be better suited as a part an existing ASF project, AOO or ODF Toolkit - what is the impact of code from UX Write not being included as a part of the proposal to the project - would like to see more mentors added -Jake On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:08 PM, jan

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

2014-12-03 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:31 PM, jan i wrote: > ...So accepting a podling is a procedural vote, maybe that the word we should > add to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#vote... Yeah or maybe you can be even more precise and add "procedural as per http://www.apache.org/foundation/vot

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

2014-12-03 Thread jan i
On 3 December 2014 at 18:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM, jan i wrote: > > ...Personally I see it as any number of +1 and no -1, but again I still > cannot > > find the documentation... > > It's at http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > So accepting a pod

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

2014-12-03 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM, jan i wrote: > ...Personally I see it as any number of +1 and no -1, but again I still cannot > find the documentation... It's at http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -Bertrand - To unsub

Re: Documentation of voting rules.

2014-12-03 Thread jan i
On 2 December 2014 at 18:32, Matt Franklin wrote: > On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 12:25:33 PM Benson Margulies > wrote: > > > Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except > > in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote, > > I think, is a test of consensu