Re: How does a podling acquire a Wiki?

Hi Markus, You can file an INFRA ticket, here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA Just select Wiki (suggestion: use CWIKI or Confluence, not MoinMoin). Once that¹s filed, we can track and make sure it gets implemented hopefully quickly. Also, see here: https://www.apache.org/dev/infra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

My search was on the key servers, by using pgp.mit.edu. The issue was that you, ironically, can't seem to search by key id. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > For the record, I did register my key fingerprint at https://id.apache.org > and my key is present at > https://pe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

For the record, I did register my key fingerprint at https://id.apache.org and my key is present at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/jhyde.asc. And it was before the release was made. So, I am surprised that it did not show up in a search. Julian On Oct 13, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Dennis E. H

Re: How does a podling acquire a Wiki?

It is up to each project on which they prefer, MoinMoin came first and is available at [1], Confluence is the newer setup of the two and is available at [2] -Jake [1]: https://wiki.apache.org [2]: https://cwiki.apache.org On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi, > > than

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > Excellent. More eyes on these issues is great. Thanks for spending your time > on this. +1 Sean and I have continued our conversation offline and were able to clarify some aspects of our (very imperfect) documentation. I beli

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote: > For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" > that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that > are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently > include a binary tar b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Even if the key is part of a web trust it may not be part of everyone's > web > > of trust. I'd see that as a hard requirement to meet. > > The last time this came up, Daniel Shahaf suggested an excellent solution: > > http://s.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > The Foundation was not set up to take on the liabilitiy associated with > binary > releases: > > http://s.apache.org/roy-binary-deps-3 > > How is that different from any of our other projects? End users > don't compile Java.

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:14 PM, sebb wrote: > >>>4. presence or absence of NOTICEs in source distribution doesn't > >>>affect binary distribution. > >> > >> Not true. > > > > Ditto. > > If you are saying that the NOTICE in an ASF binary release has no > direct bearing on the NOTICE i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Even if the key is part of a web trust it may not be part of everyone's web > of trust. I'd see that as a hard requirement to meet. The last time this came up, Daniel Shahaf suggested an excellent solution: http://s.apache.org/U57

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > It seems to me that each of those jars is a de facto binary release. Definitely not. An official release by the Apache Software Foundation consists of source code which has been audited by a PMC. Of course it is not possible to audit an enti

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On 12 October 2014 17:40, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb wrote: >> I don't think that's correct. > > Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this > point we're debating interpretations on ALv2. > >> A source distribution with NOTICE may be inc

Re: How does a podling acquire a Wiki?

Hi, thanks! Is there a notion of one being "the old one" and another being "the new one"? We come with no baggage and would like to use whatever is considered to be the future :-) Thanks, Markus On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Hi Markus > You can get a wiki setup by cre

Re: How does a podling acquire a Wiki?

Hi Markus You can get a wiki setup by creating an infra ticket [1], available options are MoinMoin or Confluence -Jake [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/infra On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi, > > we have a few wiki pages on GitHub we'd like to move to the

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

I suggest that the release manager and anyone else in the KEYS file should have added key fingerprints to their Apache profiles at . This will have their PGP keys refreshed regularly under their Apache ID at . With regard to an

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Based on recent discussion, a review of this distinction would be > valuable > > for many at Apache. > > I very much second this. I think bringing some clarity at least into the > areas of: >#1 rules for complete source release tar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > First, the signing key is present in SVN, but has not been uploaded to > the > > standard key-servers, nor has it been signed by anyone. > > I found it here: > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=Julian+Hyde&op=index > > Even if the key

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > >> >> Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents >> >> so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as >> well, but as far as in

How does a podling acquire a Wiki?

Hi, we have a few wiki pages on GitHub we'd like to move to the ASF infrastructure. For that, we'd need a wiki. How does one go about getting one? Thanks, Markus

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

Thanks Justin, as you can tell from the log I pasted, I tried that solution (unpacking the release, and using the KEYS file inside, but I was unable to verify it). Can you see below? Any ideas? ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" > that matter most these > days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the > maven repo... > ...Are these jars subjected to due diligence

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite releases in fact do not currently include a binary tar ball, only a source tar ball and maven jars. Ar

[VOTE][IP Clearance] Sling Resource Editor contribution

Hi Incubator PMC members, Apache Sling has received the donation of a resource editor module. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-resource-editor.html for the details. Please vote to approve this contribution. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus ap

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> make sure >> podlings understand the difference between source code releases and >> convenience binaries. >> > Based on recent discussion, a review of this distinction would b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

Regarding Apache RAT. I think we have that covered already. RAT is run if you specify the apache-release maven profile, and therefore is run automatically when we make a release. You can run it standalone using mvn -Papache-release verify As Ted notes, a few exclusions are needed. The top-lev

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents > > so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as > well, but as far as incubating projects are concerned it is IMO vital > to get thin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

Hi, On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:18 PM, sebb wrote: >... If the ASF mirrors are used to distribute convenience binaries, AIUI > these must still meet the following basic criteria... I tend to agree and wanted to make sure this is clearly documented, so I reread the following: https://issues.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 10:06, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: >> ...However votes on releases are more about the source release and >> binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a blocker... > > To clarify, the ASF only releas

Re: svn commit: r1631099 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml

On 13 October 2014 03:28, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 12.10.2014 14:24, sebb wrote: >> On 11 October 2014 20:15, wrote: >>> Author: cos >>> Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014 >>> New Revision: 1631099 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099 >>> Log: >>> Updating Ignite website with initial INFRA ta

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > ...However votes on releases are more about the source release and > binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a blocker... To clarify, the ASF only releases source code - votes on releases are not "more" about source,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Hi all, > > The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating). > > This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in > May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the ne