Hi all,
The required 72 hours have passed, after adding my own +1 I'd like to close
this vote with the following results:
+1 votes:
- Marcel Offermans (binding)
- Daniel Haischt
- John Ament (binding)
- Suresh Marry (binding)
- Bjoern Petri
- Till Westmann (binding)
- Erik Jansman
- Jan Willem Ja
Exercising my right to Vote ^_^ :
+0 (binding)
This seems like very small but active community but from my experience
as TLP a bit more active and diverse people to be successful.
- Henry
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since entering Incubation in No
My position on this sort of thing has shifted a whole lot over the last few
years. I used to be very careful about offending bots but after dealing
hundreds of these accounts on MapR user facing sites, I am way less sympathetic.
Kudos for humanity but I recommend not losing much sleep here.
On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
> I think it needs one more IPMC member's vote.
NM, I just read Marvin's email about the new release process that I was unaware
of. :)
Regards,
Alan
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since entering Incubation in November 2010, the Celix podling been working
> towards graduation. The community has grown, releases have been made and
> new committers have been added.
> Over the las
Only IPMC members' votes are binding until the podling is out of the incubator.
This release will need at least 3 of those votes. However, any IPMC +1 votes
will carry over to this current vote.
If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
I think it needs on
There are some Thrift generated files that don't seem to have the AL prepended.
I'm not sure if that's important since the files were automatically generated;
imo, it's not.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating.
> Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for
> large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop,
> Apac
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:54AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
> > for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
> > of of the following applies project get put to a r
It's laudable that you should give this individual the benefit of the doubt. I
agree, the motivation is not as simple as malicious spam. But their behavior
has been disruptive.
Maybe contact them and ask them why they want to be on the list? We don't want
to ban "people", but the entity behind
Julian,
There are a few more messages from this sender in the moderator queue
that I'm looking at, and while I agree they don't add a great deal of
value, I'm struggling to see the goal if they are (malicious) spam.
I'm guessing we don't want to ban people for being misguided, or lack of
insight
+1
Thanks for the work,
Gerrit Binnenmars
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Alan,
That was the result of the PPMC vote on the dev@ list. Arvind is a mentor.
-Taylor
> On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
> from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong
I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong IPMC
roster?
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
Regards,
Alan
P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate email.
On Jun
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
> 0.9.2. This will be the 2nd release of Apache Storm.
> Release vote result:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201406.mbox/%3c0f81f852-
Hi Ted,
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, June 22, 2014 6:36 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Tez graduation [Was: Request for mentor assessment]
>
>Chris
>
>Regardless of whether it is an explicit requirement
Chris
Regardless of whether it is an explicit requirement to have some specific level
of diversity, there is a requirement that the group demonstrate community
building.
The page in question may be incorrect, but as it stands it does not appear that
a diverse community has been built.
I a
Dear Nicholas Goodman,
This message acknowledges receipt of the following document, which has been
filed in the Apache Software Foundation records:
SGA From DynamoBI Corporation for OPTIQ in Incubation
-- Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
