HI Andrew,
Yeah, probably need to file JIRA to track this to make sure it is
included in next proposed release.
I am assuming this RC have your +1 Vote?
- Henry
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Let's also change the Phoenix POM to not exclude the files in examples/ si
Signatures looks ok
Hashes looks ok
Notice and License files looks good.
+1 (binding)
For next release it would be better to have more mentors VOTE on the
release to oversee the proposed artifacts before going to general@
list.
Should help catching missing DISCLAIMER file.
Good luck guys.
- He
Would it be possible for an IPMC member to clarify if you're waiting on us
for something and if so what?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to
> follow the preferred path.
>
> With these c
Thanks, Craig. Very much appreciated!
-jakob
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Thanks Craig
> Will link this thread in the INFRA ticket and start the import
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:47 PM, David
Thanks Craig
Will link this thread in the INFRA ticket and start the import
-Jake
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:47 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> >> Right, which is what I was working on. Th
On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:47 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> Right, which is what I was working on. This thread is to find out if,
>> given what that original grantor considers this new repo part of the
>> original grant, we need to go through with th
On Mar 12, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate:
>>
>> (1) The source should not include the KEYS file.
>>
>
> OK. Hopefully you saw that we also have the file on the dist s
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Right, which is what I was working on. This thread is to find out if,
> given what that original grantor considers this new repo part of the
> original grant, we need to go through with the extra work of the IP
> Clearance.
>
>
Multiple issu
Right, which is what I was working on. This thread is to find out if,
given what that original grantor considers this new repo part of the
original grant, we need to go through with the extra work of the IP
Clearance.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Jakob
> My initia
Hey Jakob
My initial request in INFRA-7412 was based on not seeing any IP clearance
[1] for the hello-samza repo. This is due to it not being apart of the
initial import of the codebase and it did not originate from the project
since it has been at the ASF. I'm happy to import the repo for you once
re: Samza
We've got a second git repository we'd like to import,
https://github.com/linkedin/hello-samza, which is a tutorial and quickstart
on the Samza project. This was originally kept separate from the code for
two reasons (a) making it stand-alone made it easier for it just be
turn-key after
I think what would help to make it into a stronger vote
would be a few more IPMC folks looking
into the status of the Allura community.
I can volunteer to take a closer look at the community today
to shape up my own opinion and cast the vote appropriately.
If there's anybody else on IPMC who can
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So where do we go from here? Four +1 votes, but only one of them from
> outside of the project membership. What does it signify? Did we pass?
Votes from the Mentors of a podling are more meaningful than votes
from unaffiliated IPMC members who
So where do we go from here? Four +1 votes, but only one of them from
outside of the project membership. What does it signify? Did we pass?
--Rich
On 03/07/2014 03:16 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Allura podling has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator. We'
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Small nonblocking issues with this release candidate:
>
> (1) The source should not include the KEYS file.
>
OK. Hopefully you saw that we also have the file on the dist server:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/o
15 matches
Mail list logo
