On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, which is what I was working on. This thread is to find out if, > given what that original grantor considers this new repo part of the > original grant, we need to go through with the extra work of the IP > Clearance. > >
Multiple issues here. The repo in question wasn't called out in the proposal that was voted on when Samza was accepted as a podling. Though for the record, neither was the initial repo. Regardless, that was almost a year ago. IMO IP Clearance is the process that covers bringing in the additional IP at this time. You'll need to follow that process, and CCLA might give you some of the paperwork you need in the process, but it doesn't obviate the need for going through the IP Clearance process. My reading of things is that as part of that IP Clearance you would need one of: * a valid CCLA with the contribution described in Schedule B (We really don't have an idea of what, if anything was in Schedule B) * A valid CCLA in conjunction with ICLAs along with attestation that it's a work held by $dayjob and you are transferring it to the ASF. * A valid SGA for the IP --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
