The question here is not CEO's involvement. But rather the way everything
reacted. Nobody likes to be accused for doing good things right? I am truly
interested about the project but I do fear what will happen according to
the mails sent by initial committers.. Also I didn't add my name to the
wiki
> It's a community that brings the project. That community doesn't cease to
> exist just because it is subsumed into Apache. A TLP's community gets to
> decide who to accept as a new community member, based on merit (with the
> board's oversight to make sure it isn't dominated by a single comm
That's a really nice world Marcel. I'd love to believe that again. However
people will still have ill intentions even here at Apache. Just because we
say all these good things does not mean everyone feels the same way and
economics does rear it's ugly face.
Just look and see the control with which
If a podling steadfastly refused to add any other committers, then I think its
mentors would try to explain why that's a bad thing, and if that behaviour
continued, then the incubator would vote against graduating it.
On 2013-09-25, at 2:12 AM, Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
> Apache is community o
A true open source contributor does not have a CEO, and takes the
personal judgements not what CEO or someone asked you to do.
Deepal
> I was actually looking forward to contributing for this project where ever
> possible but I think people have misunderstood our intentions. As requested
> by my C
Apache is community over code, but here is more like code over community.
As a community we should be able to tolerate the conflicts of interest.
Once the project is incubated in Apache, the project belongs to Apache
and direction and future of the project should be decided by the
community, not
It would be nice if everybody would started wearing their Apache hats and act
as individuals that are interested in joining an exciting new project in the
incubator. I would prefer it if everybody would assume good intentions here.
We're all collaborating out in the open as a community, so let's
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
I've written below, wearing my Apache hat.
> hmm.. it appears to me that though you pushed the project into ASF, your
> intentions were not pure and you don't want any competitor of Apigee to be
> joined to the project (by going on your wor
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> Honestly the point that keeps getting missed here is
> that everything we do at Apache proceeds at a notoriously
> slow pace so people can adjust accordingly. All things
> considered, would it be better if Sanjiva and colleag
Are you guys wearing Apache hats or WS02 hats? If you're wearing Apache hats,
then I'd expect a bit less fealty to your CEO's request and a little more "OK,
I see your point, but I'm really excited about the project, here's what I'd
like to do on the project, do you mind adding me as an initia
Voting is now closed and has passed with the following tally,
Binding +1s: Patrick Hunt, Arvind Prabhakar, Andrei Savu
Non binding +1s: Xuefu Zhang, Jarcec Cecho, Ashish Paliwal.
Thanks to everyone who voted!
Shreepadma
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
hmm.. it appears to me that though you pushed the project into ASF, your
intentions were not pure and you don't want any competitor of Apigee to be
joined to the project (by going on your words, it is quite natural to think
so.) even if they showed their genuine interest on helping the project out,
Honestly the point that keeps getting missed here is
that everything we do at Apache proceeds at a notoriously
slow pace so people can adjust accordingly. All things
considered, would it be better if Sanjiva and colleagues
ASKED to be included in the proposal instead of just adding
themselves in a
I'd start with Baldr (if a vote passes) to avoid relocation
Le 25 sept. 2013 01:18, "Olivier Lamy" a écrit :
> So what about Baldr?
> BTW we can start incubation using Monitoring then change the name for TLP?
> WDYT?
>
> On 21 September 2013 06:30, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > I would like t
I was actually looking forward to contributing for this project where ever
possible but I think people have misunderstood our intentions. As requested
by my CEO, I would like to withdraw my committer request.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Dulitha Wijewantha wrote:
> +1 for the Dave Fisher's e
+1 for the Dave Fisher's example. I believe most of the people have
misunderstood our intentions. We were offering to help the project to grow
and graduate faster. I am withdrawing my committer request as our CEO asked
too. But honestly speaking - if you guys are *scared* of the *community*
and wha
David Crossley wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> > > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
> >
> > This passes, with lots of +1 votes (plenty by PMC members) and no -1 votes.
> >
> > Thanks for voting.
> >
> >
On 23 September 2013 21:57, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have a KEYS file posted somewhere besides within the release?
>
> Thanks for a good spot and thoughtful observation, Dave. This is worth
> discussing.
>
> MHO: supplying a K
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> >
> > Put yourself in their shoes for a second? It's a big leap of faith for
> some
> > projects to come and propose for incubation. You just scared the bejesus
> > out of these guys e
On 24 September 2013 10:05, ant elder wrote:
> I closed LEGAL-178 with the resolution "Not A Problem", which is quite
> different to a resolution of "Fixed" or "Resolved" or "Answered".
>
> From my investigation, things like the text of the AL and various posts in
> the mailing lists over the year
On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> ...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not sound
>> meritocratic
>
> It's been like that for a while in the Incubator, people who sign up
> as initial commi
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> If I could offer one final word of advice: when this
> proposal is resubmitted (if it is), add some Mentors who
> fully grok this, and have the guts to back it up and to
> Do What's Right for the sake of the podling.
>
Is this necessary?
-
Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> > I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
>
> This passes, with lots of +1 votes (plenty by PMC members) and no -1 votes.
>
> Thanks for voting.
>
> Doug
Someone from the Storm project nee
On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
> Sanjiva, two points I'd like to make:
>
> 1) You have stated from your first email on this topic that you'd like to
> introduce a dependency on Stratos. The community doesn't want to do this.
Ignoring the whole 'what it is' that the community doe
On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> Put yourself in their shoes for a second? It's a big leap of faith for some
> projects to come and propose for incubation. You just scared the bejesus
> out of these guys even if they wanted to work with you.
>
You have also made it clear
Alex:
- only I from WSO2 offered to mentor AFAIK. I hereby withdraw my
suggestion. Senaka Fernando, sent a +1 binding vote but he's an ASF Member
. Senaka is not even remotely involved with this particular work - we have
250+ people in WSO2.
- given your explanation and feeling I will ask the WSO2
Sanjiva, two points I'd like to make:
1) You have stated from your first email on this topic that you'd like to
introduce a dependency on Stratos. The community doesn't want to do this.
It's not a business thing, we just want a minimum footprint architecture
based on Tomcat and Cassandra. What
So what about Baldr?
BTW we can start incubation using Monitoring then change the name for TLP?
WDYT?
On 21 September 2013 06:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I would like to throw in this document:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
>
> We should make a few tests already before
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Roy T. Fielding"
Subject: piling on
Date: July 19, 2006 3:09:17 PM PDT
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
I believe that it is a bad idea to allow people to add themselves
to a proposal as committers without first obtaining the
My wiki username is Niranjan Karunanandham. Please add as a Contributor
with permission to edit the Incubator wiki.
Thanks.
--
*Niranjan Karunanandham*
Senior Software Engineer
M: +94 777 749 661
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Alex Karasulu
> wrote:
>
> >
> > However, when the CEO of a company adamantly volunteers to mentor a
> > perspective podling, and within 36 hours a few of his employees also
> > volunteer, then people s
As mentioned before I would like to be added as a committer and help in
contributing to usergrid.
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu
> wrote:
> > ...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not so
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> ...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not sound
> meritocratic
It's been like that for a while in the Incubator, people who sign up
as initial committers for a podling usually don't have to demonstrate
any merit.
Wh
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> However, when the CEO of a company adamantly volunteers to mentor a
> perspective podling, and within 36 hours a few of his employees also
> volunteer, then people start thinking things. And this is very natural. I'm
> not saying they're f
I'm writing with my WSO2 hat on:
Ed, we didn't participate in this project in Github is that it was a Github
project run by Apigee, a competitor of ours.
When the project becomes an ASF project, it becomes an *ASF* project and
its no longer that of a particular company. We just donated one of our
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:23:34AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Jim Jagielski <[1]j...@jagunet.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:59:21AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > > On Wed
Jim, thanks for your efforts on this. Appreciate all your help so far.
Ed
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
>>
>> We definitely want participation, that's what this is all about, but I'm a
>> little bit surprised at the numbe
On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Ed Anuff wrote:
> We definitely want participation, that's what this is all about, but I'm a
> little bit surprised at the number of folks all from the same company
> affiliation who want to be committers that have had heretofore no involvement
> or interest in the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:23:34AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Jim Jagielski <[1]j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:59:21AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jim Jagielski <[2]j...@jagunet.com>
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:59:21AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim
We definitely want participation, that's what this is all about, but I'm a
little bit surprised at the number of folks all from the same company
affiliation who want to be committers that have had heretofore no
involvement or interest in the project for it's previous 2 years of ASLv2
existence on G
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:59:21AM +0600, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > Alex, if people want to join and add t
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
> > > committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlin
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
> > committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings
> > during the initial proposal stage is "I'm interested" :)
+1 (binding)
congrats!
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote:
> We've held a vote on blur-dev to release the first incubating release.
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-blur-dev/201309.mbox/%3CCAB6tTr0cG%3D78nBuQHBqzKLyn4
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
+1 (binding!)
Ben.
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
> http://spark.incubator.apache.org/
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-spark-dev/2
+1 (non-binding)
Lieven
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> I
+1 (non-binding)
Good luck!
I would be interested in being a committer on user-grid due to the
synergies that seem possible between Apache Knox (incubating) and user-grid.
If this is something that you would welcome then I would be happy to join
as an initial committer.
Regardless, good luck an
Hi All,
I also think that this will be a great addition to Apache and I should be
able to find some time to contribute to this project. Especially on the
deployment/integration aspects on PaaSes and different IaaSes.
Nirmal Fernando,
PPMC Member and Committer of Apache Stratos,
Senior Software En
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
> committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings
> during the initial proposal stage is "I'm interested" :)
Is there some more background available on why the barrier is set this
l
Forgot to add the link.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Lieven Govaerts
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
>> committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings
>> during the initial proposal stage is "I'm i
To abide, I have cancelled the vote.
I would encourage people who STILL want to be added,
and if I have not done so, to ANNOUNCE their intention
in this thread and then take on the responsibility
of adding themselves.
I will kick off another VOTE on Thursday (the 26th) at
noon eastern. I will mak
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
>> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
>> stack for
This vote has closed and has passed according to majority vote because it
has at least 3 +1 votes and more +1 than -1 votes.
The final tally is this:
*Binding +1 votes*
Ted Dunning
Steve Loughran
Benson Margulies
Grant Ingersoll
Henry Saputra
Isabel Drost-Fromm
*Binding -1 votes*
Christian Gro
This VOTE is CANCELLED.
There were some modifications to the mentor and committer
list post-VOTE and to avoid ANY concerns and/or confusion,
I have decided to stop this vote.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propos
Hi,
A vote to retire the incubating Apache Tashi project was held on tashi-dev and the
results as announced in <5240998e.40...@cmu.edu> are as follows:
In favor of retiring: 2 binding votes, 1 non-binding vote.
Opposed to retiring: 0.
Greetings,
Michael.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On 23 September 2013 22:44, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> > a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> > stack
And a belated +1, not that it needs the extra vote, but jclouds functions
great!
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing
> > anything for graduation.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
> committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings
> during the initial proposal stage is "I'm interested" :)
If a podling wants to add anyone who asks to the "initial committers" li
WSO2 affiliation?
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Dulitha Rasanga Wijewantha
wrote:
> As I have requested before can you add me into the committer list as well. I
> am interested in contributing to user-grid.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dulitha R. Wijewantha Software Engineer
> Tel: 94112793140 | Mobile:9
Correction:
Imesh Gunaratne
Committer & PPMC Member, Apache Stratos (Incubating)
Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc
Thanks
Imesh
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for your clarification.
>
> I could not express my interest in joining Usergrid as a committer b
As I have requested before can you add me into the committer list as well. I am
interested in contributing to user-grid.
Thanks
Dulitha R. Wijewantha Software Engineer
Tel: 94112793140 | Mobile:94112793140
dulit...@gmail.com |http://dulithawijewantha.com
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Jim Jag
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
> [ ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Chukwa
> [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Chukwa podling from Incubator because ...
Added.
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> No problem... usually, when someone simply sez they are interested
>> in contributing, I take that as an indication that when the podling
>> is started, they wil
All done. Thx!
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Yes I was volunteering to mentor .. please add me.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
>> but I'm not sure if he's off
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your clarification.
I could not express my interest in joining Usergrid as a committer before
we started the Voting process.
If it is not a problem, please add me as a committer.
Thanks
Imesh Gunaratne
Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos
Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc
On Tue,
Yes I was volunteering to mentor .. please add me.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
> but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
> big +1 on adding him. If you are also interested, tha
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> No problem... usually, when someone simply sez they are interested
> in contributing, I take that as an indication that when the podling
> is started, they will, well, find time to contribute. I don't
> interpret that as a "please a
+1. I'll add you to the proposal
On Sep 24, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> I would be interested in helping as a mentor for Usergrid if slots are
> available
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a m
+1
On 23 September 2013 22:44, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator podling.
>
> Voting
No problem... usually, when someone simply sez they are interested
in contributing, I take that as an indication that when the podling
is started, they will, well, find time to contribute. I don't
interpret that as a "please add me as a committer", which is a
formal request to be added as part of t
I would be interested in helping as a mentor for Usergrid if slots are
available
-Jake
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
> but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
> big +1 on adding him. If y
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a
query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed
data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark.
This is our first release. A vote was held on the MRQL developer
mailing list and it pass
+1 (binding)
Nice work guys!
-- Andrei Savu
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Aaron McCurry wrote:
> We've held a vote on blur-dev to release the first incubating release.
>
> The vote thread can be found here:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-blur-dev/201309.mbox/%3CCAB
Hi Jim,
As you can see below, I've showed my interest to join this project, but it
seems like I sent the email using a different
email address (not what I've subscribed to general incubator from) and
email went to moderation. :(
As I showed my interest before the voting started up, could you plea
+1 (binding)
-- Andrei Savu
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan <
shreepa...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
> 1.2.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
>
> Source files : http://people.apac
It's great to see many cool and exciting new projects joining Apache
Incubator.
+1 from my side
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> +1 - there's a lot of overlap / commonality of objective between BaaS and
> the set of services provided by Apache Stratos (incubating) t
Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
big +1 on adding him. If you are also interested, that would
give Usergrid a nice solid 4 mentors, which I think is pretty
much on the mark.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Jake Fa
Alex, if people want to join and add themselves as
committers, then they can. The bar to entry for podlings
during the initial proposal stage is "I'm interested" :)
On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi Niranjan, Dulitha,
>
> It's fantastic to see you and others wanting to dive
+ 1 (binding).
Good project and I will vote nevertheless, but given there is interest, why not
have a 3rd Mentor on board? This is not essential but as discussed at various
times, makes release and other IPMC binding decisions easy.
I do not want to trigger a discussion on, if we want to chang
On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing
> anything for graduation. Thanks!
+ 1 (already voted on PPMC list, just cheer leading for others to look over)
Andrew,
Since 5 IPMC member/mentors already voted on the
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Imesh Gunaratne
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to
Hi Shreepadma,
I am withdrawing my -1 as this has been resolved.
Please note, I believe this name will ask for trouble, esp with
"getsentry.com". I also believe you should discuss this in your project
if you really want to take on the risk of this name prior graduation.
Thanks,
Christian
On
I closed LEGAL-178 with the resolution "Not A Problem", which is quite
different to a resolution of "Fixed" or "Resolved" or "Answered".
>From my investigation, things like the text of the AL and various posts in
the mailing lists over the years answered the question to my satisfaction.
I doubt ev
Eric,
we discussed a little on trademarks and it has been said it is
recommended to wait for the name search issue to resolve, but not
necessary required. The PMC needs to decide themselves to take the risk.
If there is an infringement reported to trademarks, it may result in
renaming. As con
On 24 Sep 2013, at 0:42, Ted Dunning wrote:
- trademarks@ to avoid mixing public and private threads
Christian,
Shane has answered your worry about whether VP Brands has to close the
name
search before DRILL can release.
I have created the link you requested on the podling status page.
On 24 Sep 2013, at 0:11, Ted Dunning wrote:
- moving trademarks@ to bcc to avoid mixing private and public lists
*Christian*,
Do you withdraw this -1 now that Shane has said that we don't have to
wait
for PODLINGNAMESEARCH-16 to close?
I will edit the product status page to reflect curren
+1 (non binding)
On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
Incubator podling.
Voting
Hi Niranjan, Dulitha,
It's fantastic to see you and others wanting to dive in and you're all more
than welcome. We're looking forward to your involvement to the fullest
extent possible in this community.
The initial aim of the community right now is to meet the incubator entry
requirements, enter
89 matches
Mail list logo
