Congratulations!
20.06.2013 7:33 пользователь "Andrew Bayer" написал:
> The Apache jclouds (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
> jclouds 1.6.1-incubating.
>
> This is the first Apache release of jclouds. Apache jclouds is a cloud
> agnostic library that enables developers to a
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49:51PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> +Once the vote has been called the proposal should be considered fixed.
>> + No further changes are accepted.
>
> Can I suggest that you make explicit the option to can
The Apache jclouds (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
jclouds 1.6.1-incubating.
This is the first Apache release of jclouds. Apache jclouds is a cloud
agnostic library that enables developers to access a variety of supported
cloud providers using one API.
The source archives
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as part
> of the graduation requirements. These exit interviews will be suitably
> scrubbed and organized by the Incubator Ombudsman; see next proposal.
A few sample question
Hi Folks,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
Konstantin Boudnik
Henry Saputra*
Reynold Xin
Pei Chen
Roman Shaposhnik*
Suresh Marru*
Scott Deboy
Ted Dunning*
Hitesh Shah
Paul Ramirez*
Ralph Goers*
Alan Cabrera*
Thilina Gunarathne
Marcel Offermans*
Alex Karasulu*
Ch
The vote is now closed, and with 7 +1s, 4 of them IPMC, Apache jclouds
1.6.1-incubating RC3 will be released.
Here are the votes:
PPMC binding:
- Andrew Bayer
- Ignasi Barrera
- Adrian Cole
IPMC binding:
- David Nalley
- Olivier Lamy
- Suresh Marru
- Jim Jagielski
Thanks, all!
A.
On Tue, Jun
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a
> roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role
> for the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other
> organizations.
On 19 June 2013 17:41, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I will also point out that it seems to me that those who are opposed or, at
> best, lukewarm to the idea are well established and well > connected
> individuals in the ASF sphere.
Useful observation. It is so easy for us to think what we learned
year
I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a
roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role for
the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other
organizations.
With that said, I will agree that if everything is runnin
On 19/06/2013 14:00, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
Francesco,
We are welcome you to be a initial committer. Can you please add yourself
to the initial committer list in our proposal?
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
Done.
Regards.
Francesco did already some contributions to the pr
Francesco,
We are welcome you to be a initial committer. Can you please add yourself
to the initial committer list in our proposal?
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
Francesco did already some contributions to the project which is currently
on GitHub.
Regards,
Stephan
On 19.06.
Done - but please note this is the last edit I am doing on this topic.
I do not agree with the necessaity for this rule. If the IPMC wants to
make further clarifications then go for it. I have more improtant
things to do.
Index: content/incubation/Process_Description.html
=
Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
>
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator.
>
> The OData Proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal
>
> We welcome your feedback and suggestions.
>
Hi Stephan,
this proposal looks very inter
Hey Chris, it looks like a bunch binding and non binding votes by folks
(including myself, Arun Murthy, Chris Douglas, Ted Dunning, Matt Franklin,
...) on the "[PROPOSAL] Apache Spark for the Incubator" thread and maybe
you missed counting these in this tally?
See my attached screenshot for what I
+1
/* using maven, ran denominator live regression tests on route53,
dynect, ultradns-ws, and rackspace-clouddns with no problems. */
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1 (explain why)
>>
>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49:51PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> +Once the vote has been called the proposal should be considered fixed.
> + No further changes are accepted.
Can I suggest that you make explicit the option to cancel the vote, amend the
proposal, and re-start the vote? This
Thanks Marvin.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 19 Jun 2013 06:19, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> > I trust someone who believes this is a fixed rule rather than a
> > social-norm by which we are guided will no
Alexei,
To answer your two points.
Firstly they may want to complain in private. Without that option they
may just suffer in silence.
As to your Eco-champion idea, can I suggest you add it to the wiki page
Bertrand created?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 06:50 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> H
18 matches
Mail list logo
