Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

NOTICE is being generated (I believe in all cases) from incubator-jclouds.git/resources/NOTICE.txt - I think the resources/NOTICE.txt in chef may be from an earlier incarnation, but I'm not 100% sure. It does look like we are overly broad in the list of included code in NOTICE, but I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > the first jclouds release at Apache. > > We are calling this vote on both the IPMC and the jclouds PPMC at the same > time, as the code for this release has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

+1 (non binding, just been playing with Mesos) - Jean-Sebastien On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Benjamin Hindman wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Vinod! > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos > > (incubating) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

+1 PPMC On May 30, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > the first jclouds release at Apache. > > We are calling this vote on both the IPMC and the jclouds PPMC at the same > time, as the code for this relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

...and fwiw, I'm +1, PPMC. A. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > A couple other little fixes: > > The incubator-jclouds.git tag is actually at > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-jclouds.git;a=tag;h=d47a21038aafbc4d855444904e03ab1406b33df3 > . > > Not "Whirr

Re: Podling not Poddling

In fact, someone from Wales wants to rename them to be pronounced 'pothling'. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

A couple other little fixes: The incubator-jclouds.git tag is actually at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-jclouds.git;a=tag;h=d47a21038aafbc4d855444904e03ab1406b33df3 . Not "Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:", but "jclouds's KEYS file containing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

+1 Thanks Vinod! On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos > (incubating) > version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in > Apache > > . > > The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

Whoops - the link was actually http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-incubating-candidate-1/ - I've symlinked them to be safe. Sorry about that! A. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Andrew, looks like > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-incubating-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

+1 Sorry, forgot to reply to all. -- Jiang Yan Xu @xujyan On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Yan Xu wrote: > +1! > Looks good to me. > > -- > Jiang Yan Xu @xujyan > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Brenden Matthews < > brenden.matth

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

Hi Andrew, looks like http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-incubating-rc1 resulted to 404? - Henry On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > the first jclouds release at Apache. > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

+1! On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > Thanks for the actionable feedback. Will work on it. > > > > Also, had a question about what goes into the NOTICE (and COPYRIGHT) > file. > > > > According

[VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

Hello, This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, the first jclouds release at Apache. We are calling this vote on both the IPMC and the jclouds PPMC at the same time, as the code for this release has already been vetted by the jclouds developers leading up to this R

Re: Podling not Poddling

I think a lot of the "poddling" occurrences might be down to me and my atrocious spelling and getting it wrong so often i don't even notice it looks wrong now. I'll try to proofread more closely. ...ant On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:32 PM, sebb wrote: > I keep seeing the word Poddling being used

RE: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

We'll make sure the legal implifications are in place. As I am not our legal representative I would really try not to make an official statement on the matter, but I suspect it will not be an issue and since the decision to donate the project to Apache has gone through our management team, these

Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

Yeah, I guess the words "meta" and "model" had been used a lot recently in incubator list =) And also, we are still looking for mentors from IPMCs to help if anyone interested ;) - Henry On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On May 29, 2013, at 12:33 AM, ant elder wrote:

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > >> >> On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >>> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly >>> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from a

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly >> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back >> in the archives its from when the

Re: Podling not Poddling

Do it! Thanks! Regards, Alan On May 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, sebb wrote: > I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki > [1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling? > > I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation. > Anyone mind if I

Podling not Poddling

I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki [1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling? I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation. Anyone mind if I rename the Wiki page? [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlderPoddlingsWithARelea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Thanks for the actionable feedback. Will work on it. > > Also, had a question about what goes into the NOTICE (and COPYRIGHT) file. > > According to > http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices > > "Apach

Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

On May 29, 2013, at 12:33 AM, ant elder wrote: > From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to > sort out the incubator :-/ LOL, so did I! Regards, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.

Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Arvind, > > For concern 1 I will let the lead engineer Kasper to answer. I believe if > the contributors already signed copyright agreement to Human Inference then > it should be fine since it means all code contributions belong to Human >

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote: > Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly > 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back > in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process > and people didn't

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On 30 May 2013 08:08, ant elder wrote: > Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly > 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back > in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process > and people didn't really kn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

Hi Luciano, Thanks for the actionable feedback. Will work on it. Also, had a question about what goes into the NOTICE (and COPYRIGHT) file. According to http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices "Apache releases should contain a copy of each license, usually contained i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari 1.2.3-incubating RC1

+1 for the release. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Yusaku Sako wrote: > Hi all, > > ambari-1.2.3-incubating-rc1 release candidate is now available. > > Here's a summary of Ambari 1.2.3 features: > * Improved stability > * Ability to update core-site.xml properties post-install > * Ability to

Re: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel for the Apache Incubator

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > ...I > urge you to go through the the legal FAQ [1] to make sure that there are no > other dependencies that merit removal or special handling Note that this can be part of the incubation process, it has to be done before the first re

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process and people didn't really know what to call it. IMHO the simplest thing to a