On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Thanks can you please identify how my proposal isn't granular? It suggests
> next steps about 5 of them and then lists shifts in responsibility around 10
> or more of then with applicable next steps.
I believe the idea is to ma
Thanks can you please identify how my proposal isn't granular? It suggests next
steps about 5 of them and then lists shifts in responsibility around 10 or more
of then with applicable next steps.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 14, 2013, at 2:22 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
wrote:
> On Tuesday, May
Hi all,
I'd now like to summarize the vote, which happened entirely on the
jspwiki-dev@i.a.o mailinglist:
+1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC)
+1 binding from Siegried Goeschl (mentor)
+1 binding from Craig L Russell (mentor)
+1 non-binding Harry Metske (PPMC)
+1 non-binding Glen Mazza (PPMC)
+1 non-
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
> hahhahha, done!
>
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013#Issue_08_-_The_IPMC_is
_broken
thanks - although I don't share your views about the brokenness of the
Incubator (hence YAMP to have a more granular view on things), ha
And you seem to consistently imply that my proposal means "destroy it"
when I've constantly demonstrated that in fact it's a series of steps,
that are easily reversible in the traditional Apache way. The documentation
moving to the stewardship of ComDev not working out? Move it back.
Probationary T
I've removed the reference to me. It seemed to imply I agree with your
position here. I do not. I was merely encouraging you to add your
suggestion to the document since you felt it was being ignored.
In my opinion the IPMC is not broken. My suggestions for some minor
improvements are on the wiki
Alan Cabrera wrote on Tue, May 14, 2013 at 08:50:27 -0700:
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> > I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
> > well as mail list moderator tools.
> >
> > The first thing that I'm writing is a command that wil
hahhahha, done!
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013#Issue_08_-_The_IPMC_is
_broken
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop:
Feel free to add a "IPMC is broken" with a solution of "destroy it" and
link to TL:DR proposal as a solution.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 14 May 2013 18:17, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> I'm not sure why Yet another propo
I'm not sure why Yet another proposal is needed. This is already longer
than my own,
and kind of completely ignores the fact that I already wrote a TL;DR
version of this.
Bertrand's rationale is that it's hard to track email. Precisely why I
wrote my own
proposal for this over a year and a half ago
Talend is donating an XKMS service to Apache CXF that was developed within
Talend.
The IP Clearance document:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cxf-xkms.html
Full description and the patch containing the code is found attached to JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5001
On May 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
> well as mail list moderator tools.
>
> The first thing that I'm writing is a command that will print out who is the
> owner of an email alias and what projects they
There is already some really good ideas in this page. Thank you for
kicking this off Bertrand.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013
On 13 May 2013 15:04, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> (Yet Another Meta Proposal ;-)
>
> Dunno if it's just me but I have totally lost track of what th
13 matches
Mail list logo
