On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
<chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Thanks can you please identify how my proposal isn't granular? It suggests 
> next steps about 5 of them and then lists shifts in responsibility around 10 
> or more of then with applicable next steps.


I believe the idea is to make an overview of all problems and
suggestion on one page. You have made it similar granular, but you are
focusing on your point of view, while Bertrands document wants to
highlight all the different opinions (including yours).

Cheers
Christian



> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 14, 2013, at 2:22 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
>>> hahhahha, done!
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013#Issue_08_-_The_IPMC_is
>> _broken
>>
>> thanks - although I don't share your views about the brokenness of the
>> Incubator (hence YAMP to have a more granular view on things), having all
>> the suggestions for change in a single place should help build consensus on
>> what we actually want to do.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to