Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

2013-03-01 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Niall, and Greg, Just to echo Greg, +1, yes would have preferred it to have happened in the existing community then. Also, agree with Greg -- exceptions can be permitted from time to time, but I don't think graduation into existing TLP should be an accepted norm. Cheers, Chris On 3/1/13 8:55

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

2013-03-01 Thread Greg Stein
On Mar 1, 2013 8:33 PM, "Niall Pemberton" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator > > should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an > > existing TLP. The Incubator *create

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Andrei Savu
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > I'd love to be involved if you're actively looking for initial committers. > I'm very familiar with OSGi, puppet, and the Hadoop ecosystem side of > things. I'm (non-binding) +1 on accepting the project to the incubator. > Thanks Eric and wel

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Andrei Savu
Thanks Steve! On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > One thing I would recommend for the curious is to get a demo of it from > Andrei; I saw one over G+ and it looked very nice. > Anyone should feel free to email me if they want a live demo. -- Andrei Savu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Andrei Savu
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: >I would like to help and hence added myself as a mentor. Thanks for > bringing the project to Apache. > Thanks for joining! Your help is highly appreciated. -- Andrei Savu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 (binding) On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > +1 (binding). > > I would also encourage you guys to take a look at Apache Bigtop > as a way of integrating with the rest of Hadoop ecosystem and > bring more testing into the fold. > > Looking forward to working with you! >

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

2013-03-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > I concur with Chris, and want to strengthen/meta the point. The Incubator > should not be used for projects which are intended to become part of an > existing TLP. The Incubator *creates* Apache-style communities. But... Stop. > > For these, we

Re: No more existing-TLP graduations (was: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator)

2013-03-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > >>> >>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times, >>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy >>> community, but that is not a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
+1 (binding). I would also encourage you guys to take a look at Apache Bigtop as a way of integrating with the rest of Hadoop ecosystem and bring more testing into the fold. Looking forward to working with you! Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi Folks, >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Eric Sammer
I'd love to be involved if you're actively looking for initial committers. I'm very familiar with OSGi, puppet, and the Hadoop ecosystem side of things. I'm (non-binding) +1 on accepting the project to the incubator. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > Anyone else interested

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
Chris, I added a line to the Alignment section. Let me know if it's OK. -JZ On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:23 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote: > I would appreciate at some level a note in your proposal regarding at > least the concern by > one member of the IPMC that Curator should grow into its

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 27 February 2013 18:53, Andrei Savu wrote: > Hi Benson - > > Thanks for your feedback! It's too early to decide if there is an overlap > between communities. Provisionr solves a different problem being focused on > semi-automated workflows (e.g. with Rundeck) and cloud portability while > Whir

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 28 February 2013 18:11, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator. > The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST). > > [X] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator > [] +0 Don't care. > [] -1 Don't accept Tajo into the incubat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-01 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi I would like to help and hence added myself as a mentor. Thanks for bringing the project to Apache. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > Hi David - > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > I am interested in this. I know one or two things about pupp