On 3/28/12 9:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
2012/3/28 Jürgen Schmidt:
On 3/28/12 12:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
It is more or less a pure svn dump.
Right -- just with a few files moved around and a bunch filtered out.
yes, we build the src release package as part of a normal build and I
On Mar 28, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> If you want to do it right, build the whole thing from scratch -- nothing
> but the source code. If there isn't at least one person (or CI bot)
> doing that per project, we're screwed.
I think the problem has gotten more challenging over tim
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:34:30 +0200:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>> > I will try to update this document now with the recommendation from infra:
>> > http://incubator.ap
Jukka Zitting wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 22:34:30 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > I will try to update this document now with the recommendation from infra:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> can you agree?
Sure, no problem. I just want to avoid having us documenting specific
limits (the mentioned 1GB) that, as Joe said, are already becoming
outdated.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Jukka,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> I will try to update this document now with the recommendation from infra:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution
>
> While you're at it, can you please also (or rather instead) update the
Can I please once again suggest that some
of the enthusiasm for promoting the 1GB
estimate I gave be tempered a bit with the
morerealistic circumstance that this will
all soon be a non-issue again once we've sorted
out OpenOffice over the coming days and weeks?
The bigtop situation is rather uniq
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> I will try to update this document now with the recommendation from infra:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution
While you're at it, can you please also (or rather instead) update the
ASF
2012/3/28 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 3/28/12 12:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>> It is more or less a pure svn dump.
>>
>> Right -- just with a few files moved around and a bunch filtered out.
>
> yes, we build the src release package as part of a normal build and I
> exclude all svn fiels + generate
On 28 March 2012 17:19, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today the size of releases were discussed. If your podling release
> exceeds 1 GB of (total) size, please inform infra. They probably need
> to coordinate such releases to prevent problems with our mirrors.
And please remember to rem
I think a bigger issue specifically for Apache OpenOffice has to do with
branding and status of the "released" binaries.
It is where the Apache (plus "incubating") origin is brought to the users
attention and what will be understood for it. It is served up directly (from
the user perspective
Hello,
today the size of releases were discussed. If your podling release
exceeds 1 GB of (total) size, please inform infra. They probably need
to coordinate such releases to prevent problems with our mirrors.
I will try to update this document now with the recommendation from infra:
http://incub
On 3/28/12 12:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
2012/3/26 Jürgen Schmidt:
I created and used an ant script (main/solenv/bin/srcrelease.xml) to create
the src release files as part of the normal build if required. I decided to
use ant because it allows me some flexibility...
Our trunk contains 4 dir
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > [dropped infra@, I believe most interested people are already on
> general@]
> >
> > Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF
> > release. The
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there?
>
> Take such fringe projects like Ant, Tomcat, Lucene and Xalan that have
> been shipping releases like througho
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Me not happy. This is not any individual's fault, least of all Jukka,
> and certainly not a fault of the ManifoldCF podling that is going through
> this fun precisely to learn how to create an Apache release. It is an
> institutional
On Mar 28, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Roy,
>
> Of course you, personally, can't be expected to supervise all projects
> or fix all documentation. At the same time, there's something a little
> depressing about the situation. On the one hand, the principle at work
> here is, to pa
Roy,
Of course you, personally, can't be expected to supervise all projects
or fix all documentation. At the same time, there's something a little
depressing about the situation. On the one hand, the principle at work
here is, to paraphrase you, absolutely central to the defined mission
of the Fou
On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there?
>
> Take such fringe projects like Ant, Tomcat, Lucene and Xalan that have
> been shipping releases like throughout
Hi,
The podling reports for April [1] are due in one week, so now is a
good time to start thinking about them. See also the end of this
message for the list of podlings expected to report in April.
The biggest source of questions raised when reviewing past reports is
the level community activity
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> That said, I'm not aware of us actually having such a release out there?
Take such fringe projects like Ant, Tomcat, Lucene and Xalan that have
been shipping releases like throughout the past decade. See examples
dating back at least to [1
21 matches
Mail list logo
