Hi,
After passing 72 hours of voting, I tallied the vote and the proposal to
include
Oozie as an Apache Incubator project has passed.
The summary of vote is as follows:
* 9 +1's from IPMC members.
* 10 +1 from non-binding
* No -1
* No 0
Binding +1 votes (9):
Doug Cutting
Tom White
Alan D C
Given the PPMC is closed down, I think it has to be retired.
Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off.
Basically this is a larger version of "don't be afraid to delete a
line of code; it's in version control".
Hen
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Here are to s
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Been examining the asyncweb project in more details (atleast the
> asyncweb.client and asyncwebserver components). Below is my notes (simple
> draft).
>
> asyncweb notes
> -client module
> * https support for Deft's AHC (A
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
>> ...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
>> [2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that
>> no-one on the leg
> The work you did to research and verify this, is the "grease" I was talking
> about.
>>
>> Therefore I consider this code is fine to stay in SVN.
>>
>> I really don't know what other kinds of elbow grease I can apply
>
> That's it for me. I have no problems with this code staying around in case
>
Hi Christian,
On Jul 6, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
After the initial import only a few commits happened. All changes are
from the initial committers with CLA on file (no external
contributors).
The work you did to research and verify this, is the "grease" I was
talking abo
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 2:56:49 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> What is with user accounts of people who are not active in other
> apache projects and started at the ASF with the retired project? Are
> the accounts closed too?
>
> Any more ideas?
>
> I am +1 for creating a page on the incubat
OK, finally I understood.
I will sign it off then.
Thanks for your patience and your explains
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> We're interested in the history of the initial revision in svn;
> subsequent commits will be covered by CLAs etc per our usual process.
>
> In thi
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Currently I'd describe it as:
>> http://attic.apache.org/process.html
>
>
> So, is a failed incubation project going into the attic? I don't think
> so. In addition i don't think
We're interested in the history of the initial revision in svn;
subsequent commits will be covered by CLAs etc per our usual process.
In this case it sounds good. If this was a commercial entity
contributing, and they signed a software grant then we'd be covered.
Update the Incubator website to in
Here are to sections, retired and dormant:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
What is the actual difference between these two?
I think we should only have one term and one section, be it retired or dormant.
Cheers
Christian
--
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Currently I'd describe it as:
> http://attic.apache.org/process.html
So, is a failed incubation project going into the attic? I don't think
so. In addition i don't think board needs to approve that, this is
incubator business.
So my list w
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>...
> Please cast your votes:
+1 (binding)
-Bertrand
--
After the initial import only a few commits happened. All changes are
from the initial committers with CLA on file (no external
contributors).
Therefore I consider this code is fine to stay in SVN.
I really don't know what other kinds of elbow grease I can apply
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Jul 5,
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> ...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
> [2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that
> no-one on the legal team updated [1] to reflect new policy.
I think [1] is correct,
On 06/07/2011 11:57, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
(Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump
in and correct me)
Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with
[2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that
no-one on t
On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> Hi Suresh
>
>> I am interested to contribute to this project, since any one did not vote
>> yet, can I add my name to the Initial Committers?
>
> The proposal is fixed when the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Hi Suresh
> I am interested to contribute to this project, since any one did not vote
> yet, can I add my name to the Initial Committers?
The proposal is fixed when the VOTE thread starts (so that everyone is
voting on the same proposition).
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> [ X] +1 Accept Oozie for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Oozie incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Oozie for incubation
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
(Apologies if I've missed any changes in Apache policy - please jump
in and correct me)
> 1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products should
> not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in DEPENDENCIES. This can be
> g
This VOTE is canceled.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi Edward...
>
> In that case would you please cancel this [VOTE] thread and start a
> new one. Notice that when producing the RC3 you would have to start a
> [VOTE] thread on your dev@ first and when passed yo
Hi Edward...
In that case would you please cancel this [VOTE] thread and start a
new one. Notice that when producing the RC3 you would have to start a
[VOTE] thread on your dev@ first and when passed you start a [VOTE]
again here in general@.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Edward J. Yoon w
Thanks, BTW, if adding CDDL license and notice is enough to release,
I'd like to do at the moment. Because we're trying to release monthly,
and maven pom can be improved next time.
I'm going to upload RC3 again.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> Presumably this means the vote
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>
> The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/i
+1 (Binding)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>
> The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:
>
> http://wi
Presumably this means the vote is cancelled, because the ZIP being voted
on hasn't been updated?
Also...
1. as I understand it, notices and licenses for 3rd party products
should not go in NOTICE and LICENSE, but should go in DEPENDENCIES.
This can be generated automatically using maven-remot
26 matches
Mail list logo
